In the field of psychopathology, “narcissistic and identity-related suffering” refers to a type of suffering characterized by a lack of being that centrally affects narcissism and identity continuity/discontinuity. Present in many clinical and psychopathological pictures, these problems in turn invite us to undertake a rereading of the modalities of structuration of subjectivity in the course of development. Elements for a model of identity construction are proposed based on the paradigm of the double. Approached from the angle of paradox, identity is thought of as a process in the service of “becoming a subject” based, essentially, on the role of the object and its reflexive function. Drawing on the concept of “transitional double,” this perspective allows the foundations of subjective identity and their stages of construction to be described; these foundations underlie the creation of an internal psychic mirror, the locus of one’s relationship to self. These considerations give us a better understanding of the logics of narcissistic and identity-related pathologies, which are characterized in particular by a failure of reflexive capacities, revealing the uncertainties of the dual relational dynamic in the course of early development.
AssounP. (2009). L’introuvable identité: Destins freudiens de l’identification [The untraceable identity: Freudian destinies of identification]. Rue Descartes4:59–65.
3.
BionW.R. (1962). Learning from Experience. London: Heinemann.
4.
BratenS. (1988). The virtual other. In Between Rationality and Cognition, ed. CampanellaM.Turin: Albert Meynier, pp. 205–235.
5.
EriksonE.H. (1956). The problem of ego identity. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association4:56–121.
6.
FerrantA. (2007). Pôle d’organisation narcissique-identitaire [Narcissistic-identity organization pole]. In Manuel de psychologie et de psychopathologie clinique générale [Handbook of Psychology and General Clinical Psychopathology], ed. RoussillonR.Paris: Masson, pp. 459–483.
7.
FreudS. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. Standard Edition4/5.
8.
FreudS. (1911). Formulations on the two principles of mental functioning. Standard Edition12:218–226.
9.
FreudS. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. Standard Edition18:7–64.
10.
FreudS. (1925). Negation. Standard Edition19:235–239.
11.
FreudS. (1933). New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. Standard Edtion22:5–182.
12.
GergelyG. (1998). Naissance de la capacité de régulation des affects [Birth of the capacity to regulate affects]. In Prendre soin du jeune enfant [Looking after Infants], ed. AppellG.TardosA.Toulouse: Érès, pp. 63–74.
13.
GergelyG.KoosO.WatsonJ.S. (2002). Perception causale et rôle des comportements imitatifs des parents dans le développement socio-émotionnel précoce [Causal perception and the role of parental imitative behavior in early socio-emotional development]. In Imiter pour découvrir l’humain [Imitate to Discover the Human], ed. NadelJ.DecetyJ.Paris: PUF, pp. 59–81.
14.
GolseB. (2010). Les destins du développement chez l’enfant [The Fates of Child Development]. Paris: Erès.
15.
GreenA. (1977). Atomes de parenté et relations oedipiennes [Atoms of kinship and oedipal relationship]. In L’identité [Identity], ed. Lévi-StraussC.Paris: PUF, 2000, pp. 81–98.
16.
GreenA. (2002). Idées directrices pour une psychanalyse contemporaine [Guiding Ideas for Contemporary Psychoanalysis]. Paris: PUF.
17.
GreenacreP. (1958). Emotional Growth. New York: International Universities Press.
18.
JacobsonE. (1964). Le Soi et le monde objectal [The Self and the Object World]. Paris: PUF, 1975.
19.
JungJ. (2010). Du paradoxe identitaire au double transitionnel: Le Horla de Maupassant [From identity paradox to transitional double: Maupassant’s Horla]. Revue française de psychanalyse74:507–519.
20.
JungJ. (2015). Le sujet et son double [The Subject and His Double]. Paris: Dunod.
21.
JungJ.RoussillonR. (2013). L’identité et le “double transitionnel [Identity and the “transitional double”]. Revue française de psychanalyse77:1042–1054.
22.
KestembergE. (1999). L’adolescence à vif [Raw Adolescence]. Paris: PUF.
23.
LacanJ. (1949). The mirror stage as formative of the I function, as revealed in psychoanalytic experience. In Écrits, transl. FinkB.New York: Norton, 2006, pp. 3–9.
24.
LichtensteinH. (1961). Identity and sexuality: A study of their interrelationship in man. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association9:179–260.
25.
M’Uzan deM. (1976a). Contre-transfert et système paradoxal [Countertransference and the paradoxical system]. In De l’art à la mort [From Art to Death]. Paris: Gallimard, pp. 164–181.
26.
M’Uzan deM. (1976b). Countertransference and the paradoxical system. In Psychoanalysis in France, ed. LeboviciS.WidlöcherD.New York: International Universities Press, 1980, pp. 437–451.
27.
OppenheimerA. (2002). Identité [Identity]. In Dictionnaire international de la psychanalyse [International Dictionary of Psychoanalysis], ed. MijollaA., et al. Paris: Hachette, pp. 822–823.
28.
RankO. (1922). The Double: A Psychoanalytic Study, transl. TuckerH.Jr. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1971.
29.
RoussillonR. (1991). Paradoxes et situations limites de la psychanalyse [Paradoxes and Borderline Situations in Psychoanalysis]. Paris: PUF.
30.
RoussillonR. (1999). Agonie, clivage et symbolisation [Agony, Cleavage, and Symbolization]. Paris: PUF.
31.
RoussillonR. (2004). La dépendance primitive et l’homosexualité primaire «en double» [Primitive dependance and «mirrored» primary homosexuality]. Revue française de psychanalyse68:421–439.
32.
RoussillonR. (2008). Le jeu et l’entreje(u) [The Game and the Midfield]. Paris: PUF.
33.
RoussillonR. (2010). The deconstruction of primary narcissism. International Journal of Psychoanalysis91:821–837.
34.
SternD.N. (1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant: A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York: Basic Books.
35.
TrevarthenC.AitkenK.J. (2003). Intersubjectivité chez le nourrisson: Recherche, théorie et application clinique [Intersubjectivity in the infant: Research, theory, and clinical application]. Devenir15:309–428.
36.
WinnicottD.W. (1956). Primary maternal preoccupation. In Through Paediatrics to Psycho-Analysis: Collected Papers. New York: Basic Books, 1958, pp. 300–305.
37.
WinnicottD.W. (1967). Mirror-role of mother and family in child development. In The Predicament of the Family: A Psychoanalytical Symposium, ed. LomasP.London: Hogarth Press, pp. 149–159.
