In this article, I explore how activists have sustained the movement against nuclear weapons in spite of persistent funding challenges. Using publicly available grant information, I demonstrate that foundation funding has typically come only after windows of opportunity had already opened—and activist campaigns were well underway. Next, I explore how activists drew on their personal resources to mobilize during three key moments: the scientists’ campaign, the test ban campaign, and the nuclear freeze campaign. Drawing on scholarly accounts of the movement, I divide these activists into three categories—professionals, homemakers, and moral witnesses—and sketch how each contributed to the movement against nuclear weapons. In light of this history, I draw two conclusions. First, I argue that more reliable funding would allow activists to respond to fleeting windows of opportunity more effectively and efficiently. Second, I suggest that the movement’s reliance on the personal resources of activists has allowed it to survive, but at the expense of building a diverse coalition in support of disarmament.
Barnhart SethiM. (2012). Information, education, and indoctrination: The Federation of American Scientists and public communication strategies in the atomic age. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 42(1), 1–29.
BoyerP. (1984). From activism to apathy: The American people and nuclear weapons, 1963–1980. The Journal of American History, 70(4), 821–844. https://doi.org/10.2307/1899750
4.
CousinsN. (1992). Interview by Basiago, A.D. World citizen oral history transcript: Norman Cousins. Oral History Program. University of California.
5.
DivineR. A. (1978). Blowing on the wind: The nuclear test ban debate, 1954–1960. Oxford University Press.
6.
DonaghyA. (2021). The second Cold War: Carter, Reagan, and the politics of foreign policy. Cambridge University Press.
7.
Federation of American Scientists. (2024). Our history. Retrieved September 4, 2024, from https://fas.org/history/
8.
FreemanS. L. (2023). Dreams for a decade: International nuclear abolitionism and the end of the Cold War. University of Pennsylvania Press.
9.
GienappA.ChewA.HarmerA.OzkanA.ChanB.DruckerJ. (2020). MacArthur Foundation nuclear challenges: Big bet. 2020 Evaluation and Learning Synthesis. ORS Impact.
10.
HayesM. T. (1987). Incrementalism as dramaturgy: The case of the nuclear freeze. Polity, 19(3), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.2307/3234798.
11.
JoppkeC. (1991). Social movements during cycles of issue attention: The decline of the anti-nuclear energy movements in West Germany and the USA. The British Journal of Sociology, 42(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/590834
12.
Karan JacobsonH.SteinE. (1966). Diplomats, scientists, and politicians: The United States and nuclear test ban negotiations. University of Michigan Press.
13.
Kimball SmithA. (1978). Scientists and the public interest 1945–1946. Newsletter on Science, Technology, & Human Values, 24, 24–32.
14.
KnoblauchW. M. (2017). Nuclear freeze in a Cold War: The Reagan administration, cultural activism, and the end of the arms race. University of Massachusetts Press.
MaarH. R.III. (2022). Freeze! The grassroots movement to halt the arms race and end the Cold War. Cornell University Press.
17.
MeyerD. S. (1990). Winter of discontent: The nuclear freeze and American politics. Praeger.
18.
MeyerD. S. (1993a). Institutionalizing dissent: The United States structure of political opportunity and the end of the nuclear freeze movement. Sociological Forum, 8(2), 157–179.
19.
MeyerD. S. (1993b). Protest cycles and political process: American peace movements in the nuclear age. Political Research Quarterly, 46(3), 451–479. https://doi.org/10.2307/448943
20.
MeyerD. S.WhittierN. (1994). Social movement spillover. Social Problems, 41(2), 277–298.
21.
MooreK. (2008). Disrupting science: Social movements, American scientists, and the politics of the military. Princeton University Press.
22.
MorrisonP. (1965). The atomic scientists’ campaign of the 1940’s. [Review of the book A peril and a hope: the scientists’ movement in America, 1945–1947, by A. Kimball-Smith]. Scientific American, 213(3), 257–262.
23.
NepstadS. E. (2009). Disruptive action and the prophetic tradition: War resistance in the Plowshares movement. U.S. Catholic Historian, 27(2), 97–113.
24.
NepstadS. E. (2004). Persistent resistance: Commitment and community in the Plowshares movement. Social Problems, 51(1), 43–60.
OverbyL. M.RitchieS. J. (1991). Mobilized masses and strategic opponents: A resource mobilization analysis of the clean air and nuclear freeze movements. The Western Political Quarterly, 44(2), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.2307/448781
27.
RochonT. R.MazmanianD. A. (1993). Social movements and the policy process. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162935280010
28.
RubinsonP. (2011). Crucified on a cross of atoms: Scientists, politics, and the Test Ban Treaty. Diplomatic History, 35(2), 283–319.
29.
SanteseA. (2017). Ronald Reagan, the nuclear weapons freeze campaign and the nuclear scare of the 1980s. The International History Review, 39(3), 496–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2016.1220403
30.
SwerdlowA. (1993). Traditional motherhood and radical politics in the 1960s. University of Chicago Press.
31.
TannenbaumN. (2005). Stigmatizing the bomb: Origins of the nuclear taboo. International Security, 29(4), 5–49.
32.
WangJ. (1999). American science in an age of anxiety: Scientists, anticommunism, and the Cold War. University of North Carolina Press.
33.
WilsonR. R. (1996). Hiroshima: The scientists’ social and political reaction. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 140(3), 350–357.
34.
WittnerL. S. (1969). Rebels against war: The American peace movement, 1941–1960. Columbia University Press.
35.
WittnerL. S. (2012). Looking back: Norman Cousins and the Limited Test Ban Treaty of 1963. Arms Control Today, 42(10), 34–36.
36.
WittnerL. S. (2016). Peace through strength? The impact of the antinuclear uprising on the Carter and Reagan administrations. In ConzeE.VaronJ.KlimkeM. (Eds.), Nuclear threats, nuclear fear and the Cold War of the 1980s (pp. 271–289). Cambridge University Press.
