Based on photovoice and interview data from 144 Arizona young adults collected as part of the Arizona Youth Identity Project, this article builds on the concept of collective effervescence and symbolic violence through an analysis of U.S. flag images submitted by our respondents during the 2020 presidential election. Drawing on the literature on identity, belonging, and national symbols, this article highlights three main themes. First, our data revealed the conflicted feelings of belonging and exclusion that the U.S. flag evoked in these young adults. According to some participants, the flag became a divisive symbol as it became associated with the Make America Great Again movement. Second, we highlight how the U.S. flag came to embody a form of symbolic violence, particularly after the attack on the Capitol on January 6. Finally, we show how the meaning attached to the U.S. flag is situational and fluid, and how its value as a unifying national symbol can be restored. This narrative was supported by young adults’ images of the flag with artistic modifications that reflected elements of their culture and history.
AlozieN. O. (1995). Political tolerance hypotheses and white opposition to a Martin Luther King holiday in Arizona. The Social Science Journal, 32(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-3319(95)90016-0
2.
BourdieuP.WacquantL. (2004). Symbolic violence. In Scheper-HughesN.BourgoisP. (Eds.) Violence in war and peace (pp. 272–74). Blackwell Publication.
CampbellK. (2011). The road to S.B. 1070: How Arizona became ground zero for the immigrants’ rights movement and the continuing struggle for Latino civil rights in America. Harvard Latino Review, 14, 1–21.
5.
Carreira da SilvaF.RogenhoferJ. (2023). Populist things. A study on the materiality of political ideas. Sociology Compass, 17(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.92450
6.
CastañedaE. (2019). Building walls: Excluding Latin people in the United States. Rowman & Littlefield.
7.
CeruloK. (1993). Symbols and the world system: National anthems and flags. Social Forum, 8(2), 243–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115492
8.
ChavezL. (2008). The Latino threat: Constructing immigrants, citizens, and nation. Stanford University Press.
9.
ChavezL. R.CamposB.CoronaK.SanchezD.RuizC. B. (2019). Words hurt: Political rhetoric, emotions/affect, and psychological well-being among Mexican-origin youth. Social Science & Medicine, 228, 240–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.03.008
10.
DurkheimE. (1915). The elementary forms of the religious life. Macmillan.
11.
FinellE.ZogmaisterC. (2015). Blind and constructive patriotism, national symbols and outgroup attitudes. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56(2), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12193
12.
Flores-GonzálezN. (2017). Citizens but not Americans: Race and belonging among Latino Millennials. New York University Press.
13.
Flores-GonzálezN.EstradaE.TellezM.CarreonD.RomanelloB. (2023). The impact of the 100-mile Border Enforcement Zone on Mexican Americans in Arizona. American Behavioral Scientist. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642241229532
14.
Gómez-CervantesA.AlvordD.MenjívarC. (2018). “Bad hombres”: The effects of criminalizing Latino immigrants through law and media in the rural midwest. Migration Letters, 15(2), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v15i2.368
15.
HatzenbuehlerM. L.PrinsS. J.FlakeM.PhilbinM.FrazerM. S.HagenD.HirschJ. (2017). Immigration policies and mental health morbidity among Latinos: A state-level analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 174, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.040
16.
JiménezT. (2009). Replenished ethnicity: Mexican Americans, immigration, and identity. University of California Press.
17.
KemmelmeierM.WinterD. G. (2008). Sowing patriotism, but reaping nationalism? Consequences of exposure to the American flag. Political Psychology, 29(6), 859–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00670.x
18.
KovacsE.CotfasL.DelceaC. (2022). From unhealthy online conversation to political violence: The case of the January 6th events at the Capitol [Conference presentation]. 14th International Conference on Computational Collective Intelligence, Hammamet, Tunisia.
19.
KuligT. C.GrahamA.CullenF.PiqueroA.HanerM. (2021). “Bad hombres” at the Southern US border? White nationalism and the perceived dangerousness of immigrants. Journal of Criminology, 54(3), 283–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865820969760
20.
MarmoJ. (2010). The American flag and the body: How the flag and the body create an American meaning. Kaleidoscope: A Graduate Journal of Qualitative Communication Research, 9(4), 45–64.
21.
MartinN. D. (2024, this issue). Young adults in turbulent times: Findings from the Arizona Youth Identity Project. American Behavioral Scientist.
22.
MartinezG. A. (2012). Arizona, immigration, and Latinos: The epistemology of Whiteness, the geography of race, interest convergence, and the view from the perspective of critical theory. Arizona State Law Journal, 44, 175–211.
23.
MenjívarC.AbregoL. (2012). Legal violence: Immigration law and the lives of Central American immigrants. The American Journal of Sociology, 117(5), 1380–1421. https://doi.org/10.1086/663575
24.
Munoz CasarrubiasA. M.SantellanoK.Flores-GonzálezN.EstradaE. (2024, this issue). Cautious optimism: Latinx youth’s perspectives on the American Dream. American Behavioral Scientist.
PascoM. C.RoqueA.RomanelloB.EstradaE. (2024). Photovoice: Methodological insights from a multi-site online design. Field Methods. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X241244421
27.
Rodriguez-VegaS. (2022). Drawing deportations: Art and resistance among immigrant children. New York University Press.
28.
RomeroM. (2011). Keeping citizenship rights White: Arizona’s racial profiling practices in immigration law enforcement. Law Journal for Social Justice, 1(1), 97–113.
29.
RuthA.EstradaE.Martinez-FuentesS.Vazquez-RamosA. (2019). Soy de aquí, soy de allá: DACAmented homecomings and implications for identity and belonging. Latino Studies, 17(3), 304–322. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41276-019-00197-9
30.
SanchezJ. C. (2018). Trump, the KKK, and the versatility of white Supremacy rhetoric. Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric, 8(1/2), 44–56.
31.
SchatzR. T.LavineH. (2007). Waving the flag: National symbolism, social identity, and political engagement. Political Psychology, 28(3), 329–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00571.x
Sinclair-ChapmanV. (2018). (De)constructing symbols: Charlottesville, the confederate flag, and a case for disrupting symbolic meaning. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 6(2), 316–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2018.1455597
34.
Szkupinski QuirogaS.MedinaD. M.GlickJ. (2014). In the belly of the beast: Effects of anti-immigration policy on Latino community members. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(13), 1723–1742. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214537270
35.
TalbertR. D. (2017). Culture and the confederate flag: Attitudes toward a divisive symbol. Sociology Compass, 11(2), e12454. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12454
36.
TsosieR. (2016). The politics of inclusion: Indigenous peoples of U.S. citizenship. UCLA Law Review, 63, 1692–1745.
37.
VargasE. D.SanchezG. R.JuárezM. (2017). Fear by association: perceptions of anti-immigrant policy and health outcomes. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 42(3), 459–483. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-3802940
38.
Watts SmithC. (2023). The making of a mantra: Americans’ racial ideologies in the era of Black, Blue, and All Lives Matter. Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics, 8(3), 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2023.21
39.
WrightM.CitrinJ. (2011) Saved by the stars and stripes? Images of protest, salience of threat, and immigration attitudes. American Politics Research, 39(2), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X10388140
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
