Why Do We Do as We Do? How Do We Know What’s Best? Reflecting on the Methodological Challenges of Measurement in Initiatives Using Digital Technologies for Combating Corruption
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2026
Why Do We Do as We Do? How Do We Know What’s Best? Reflecting on the Methodological Challenges of Measurement in Initiatives Using Digital Technologies for Combating Corruption
This paper discusses the methodological challenges in the design of anti-corruption initiatives utilizing digital technologies. In particular, the focus is on the measurement problem. Using anti-corruption initiatives as case studies, two central issues are raised: firstly, examining and unpacking the rationale for how digital technologies are understood (and assumed) as useful for combating corruption. Secondly, identifying motives and drivers within these anti-corruption initiatives. As digital technology is further employed in anti-corruption initiatives, it seems a good point at present, to stop and reflect on how and why such initiatives are designed with digital technologies. The paper concludes that there is a need to include greater discussion about the underlying methodological challenges around measurements. It requires more openness in terms of the principles and the system of methods used for the selection of digital technologies, connecting choice to the identified objective, and the role of measurement to the objective.
AdamI.FazekasM. (2021). Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence. Information Economics and Policy, 57(100950), 1–14.
2.
AstafurovaO. A.BorisovaA. S.GolomanchukE. V.YagotinstevaT. Y. (2020). Use of modern information technologies for countering corruption in executive authorities. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(3), 209–214.
3.
BardhanP. (2006). The economist’s approach to the problem of corruption. World Development, 34(2), 341–348.
4.
BicchieriC.MercierH. (2014). Norms and beliefs: How change occurs. The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly, 63, 60–82.
5.
BratuR.SotiropoulosD. A.StoyanovaM. (2017). Through the lens of social constructionism: The development of innovative anti-corruption policies and practices in Bulgaria, Greece and Romania, 2000–2015. The Slavonic and East European Review, 95(1), 117–150.
6.
BussellJ. (2015). Chapter 1 – Typologies of corruption: A pragmatic approach. In Rose-AckermanS.LagunesP. (Eds.), Greed, corruption, and the modern state. Essays in political economy. (pp.21–45). Edward Elgar Publishing.
7.
ChakrabortyA. (2024). Chapter 5: Potentialities and affordances of grassroots civic tech platforms as effective anti-corruption tools: Decoding the story of I Paid A Bribe, India. In MattoniA. (Ed.), Digital Media and Grassroots Anti-Corruption. Contexts, Platforms and Data of Anti-Corruption Technologies Worldwide. (pp.97–117). Edward Elgar Publishing.
8.
FazekasM.TóthI. J.KingL. P. (2016). An objective corruption risk index using public procurement data. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 22(3), 369–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-016-9308-z
9.
FreireD.GaldinoM.MignozzettiU. (2020). Bottom-up accountability and public service provision: Evidence from a field experiment in Brazil. Research & Politics, 7(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020914444
10.
GranovetterM. (2007). Chapter 6: The social construction of corruption. In NeeV.SwedbergR. (Eds.), On capitalism. (pp.152-174). Stanford University Press.
11.
HalaiA.HaliaV.HrechaniukR.DatskoK. (2021). Digitial anti-corruption tools and their implementation in various legal systems around the world. SHS Web Conferences, 100 (03005).
12.
HeinrichF.HodessR. (2011). Chapter 3: Measuring corruption. In GraycarA.SmithR. G. (Eds.), Handbook of global research and practice in corruption. (pp.18–33). Edward Elgar Publishing.
13.
HeywoodP. M. (2017). Rethinking corruption: Hocus-pocus, locus and focus. The Slavonic and East European Review, 95(1), 21–48.
14.
IonescuL. (2013). The Impact that E-Government can have on reducing corruption and enhancing transparency. Economics, Management, and Fianancial Markets, 8(2), 210–215.
15.
Janaagraha. (2010). Creators of the online initiativeI Paid a Bribe in India in 2010. Retrieved October20, 2023, from https://www.janaagraha.org
16.
KannaiahV. (2016). I paid a bribe: Using technology to fight corruption in India. Blogs. LSE. Retrieved October20, 2023, from https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/74750/
17.
KimC.-K. (2014). Anti-corurption initiatives and E-government: A cross-national study. Public Organization Review, 14, 385–396.
18.
KöbisN.StarkeC.RahwanI. (2021). Artificial intelligence as an anti-corruption tool (AI-ACT)—Potentials and pitfalls for top-down and bottom-up approaches. arXiv:2102.11567. Retrieved October23, 2023, from https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2102/2102.11567.pdf
19.
KöbisN.van ProoijenJ.-W.RighettiF.Van LangeP. A. M. (2015). “Who doesn’t?”—The impact of descriptive norms on corruption. PLoS One, 10(6), e0131830. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131830
LancasterT. D.MontinolaG. R. (1997). Toward a methodology for comparative study of political corruption. Crime, Law & Social Change, 27, 185–206.
22.
LedenevaA.BratuR.KökerP. (2017). Corruption studies for the twenty-first century: Paradigm shifts and innovative approaches. Slavonic and East European Review, 95(1), 1–20.
23.
Mineshima-LoweD. (2024). Chapter 10: Involving citizens through multi-platform strategies: Transparency Watch in North Macedonia. In MattoniA. (Ed.), Digital Media and Grassroots Anti-Corruption. Contexts, Platforms and Data of Anti-Corruption Technologies Worldwide. (pp.205–228). Edward Elgar Publishing.
24.
Mungiu-PippidiA. (2015). Corruption: Political and public aspects. In WrightJ. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. 2nd edn, (Vol. 5, pp.12–20). Elsevier.
25.
Mungiu-PippidiA.FazekasM. (2020) Chapter 2: How to define and measure corruption. In Mungiu-PippidiA.HeywoodP. M. (Eds.), A research agenda for studies of corruption (pp.7–26). Edward Elgar Publishing.
26.
NeosD. (2013). Crowdsourcing to fight corruption in Macedonia: Interview with Metodi Zajkov (Transparency International—Macedonia). International Affairs Forum, 4(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/23258020.2013.830911
27.
NevesF. R.Da SilvaP. B.De CarvalhoH. L. M. (2019) Artificial ladies against corruption: Searching for legitimacy at the Brazilian Supreme Audit Institution. Revista De Contabilidade e Organizações, 13 (November), 31–50.
28.
OdillaF. (2023). Bots against corruption: Exploring the benefits and limitations of AI-based anti-corruption technology. Crime, Law and Social Change, 80, 353–396.
29.
OdillaF. (2024). Chapter 2: From concerned citizens to civic bots: The bottom-up fight against corruption in Brazil from a longitudinal perspective. In MattoniA. (Ed.), Digital Media and Grassroots Anti-Corruption. Contexts, Platforms and Data of Anti-Corruption Technologies Worldwide. (pp.24–51). Edward Elgar Publishing.
30.
OlkenB. (2007). Monitoring corruption: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy, 115(2), 200–249.
31.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2022). Glossary of key terms in evaluations and results based management. 2nd ed. Retrieved October23, 2023 from https://one.oecd.org/document/DCD/DAC/EV(2022)2/en/pdf
32.
PeifferC. (2018). Message received? Experimental findings on how messages about corruption shape perceptions. British Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000108
33.
Rose-AckermanS. (1975). The economics of corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 4(2), 187–203.
34.
RyvkinD.SerraD.TremewanJ. (2017). I paid a bribe: An experiment of information sharing and extortionary corruption. European Economic Review, 94, 1–22.
WedelJ. R. (2012). Rethinking corruption in an age of ambiguity. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8(1), 453–498.
41.
WickbergS. (2019). Chapter 7: Political corruption in a world in transition: The fluctuating boundaries of corruption. In MendilowJ.PhélippeauE. (Eds.), Political corruption in a world in transition. (pp.139–160). Vernon Press.
