This article presents an empirical examination of attribution and appraisal theories, focusing on young individuals’ beliefs about causality and feelings toward two social issues impacting the welfare of others: food insecurity and opioid addiction. Using a deductive qualitative approach, this investigation deepens and expands our theoretical understanding of how causal beliefs shape moral evaluations and corresponding emotions. Through focus group discussions (N = 9), participants revealed distinct patterns of causal cognitions and specific negative, other-oriented moral emotions. Causes of individuals’ hardships were characterized along four themes (personal choices, inherited circumstances, systemic issues, unexpected events), linking beliefs with corresponding discrete emotional experiences resembling contempt, pity, resentment, and compassion. Findings provide a description of attributions that supports a nuanced understanding of the complex relationship between causality and emotion, thus contributing to the current theoretical perspective. Practical implications and opportunities for further investigation are discussed in view of the broader goal of developing strategies to amplify civic engagement.
ChanJ. K. H.XiangW.-N. (2022). Fifty years after the wicked-problems conception: Its practical and theoretical impacts on planning and design. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 4(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-022-00106-w
4.
CrossleyM. L. (2002). “Could you please pass one of those health leaflets along?”: Exploring health, morality and resistance through focus groups. Social Science & Medicine, 55(8), 1471–1483. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00265-9
FeatherN. T. (2006). Deservingness and emotions: Applying the structural model of deservingness to the analysis of affective reactions to outcomes. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 38–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280600662321
7.
FeatherN. T.McKeeI. R. (2009). Differentiating emotions in relation to deserved or undeserved outcomes: A retrospective study of real-life events. Cognition and Emotion, 23(5), 955–977. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802243378
8.
FeinbergM.WillerR. (2019). Moral reframing: A technique for effective and persuasive communication across political divides. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13, e12501. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12501
GoetzJ. L.Simon-ThomasE. (2017). The landscape of compassion: Definitions and scientific approaches. In SeppäläE. M.Simon-ThomasE.BrownS. L.WorlineM. C.Daryl CameronC.DotyJ. R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compassion science (pp. 27–43). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190464684.013.1
11.
GreitemeyerT.RudolphU. (2003). Help giving and aggression from an attributional perspective: Why and when we help or retaliate. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(5), 1069–1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01939.x
12.
HaidtJ. (2003). The moral emotions. In DavidsonR. J.SchererK. R.GoldsmithH. H. (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (Vol. 1199, pp. 852–870). Oxford University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-07773-044
13.
HareliS. (2014). Making sense of the social world and influencing it by using a naïve attribution theory of emotions. Emotion Review: Journal of the International Society for Research on Emotion, 6(4), 336–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914534501
14.
HeadB. W. (2022). Wicked problems in public policy: Understanding and responding to complex challenges. Springer Nature.
15.
HeflinC.SunX. (2022). Food insecurity and the opioid crisis. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 703(1), 262–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162221149287
16.
HesterE. B.IvanovB.ParkerK. A. (2021). Overcoming obstacles to collective action by communicating compassion in science. In O’HairH. D.O’HairM. J. (Eds.), Communicating science in times of crisis: The COVID-19 pandemic (pp. 150–171). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119751809.ch7
17.
HesterE. B.IvanovB.ParkerK. A.SajjadM. (2022). Communication strategies to initiate and sustain catastrophe compassion. In O’HairH. D.O’HairM. J. (Eds.), Communication and catastrophic events: Strategic risk and crisis management (pp. 65–83). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119751847.ch5
KennedyE. H.MuzzerallP. (2022). Morality, emotions, and the ideal environmentalist: Toward a conceptual framework for understanding political polarization. The American Behavioral Scientist, 66(9), 1263–1285. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642211056258
20.
KruegerR.CaseyM. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage.
21.
LazarusR. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press.
22.
LewisN.SznitmanS. R. (2017). You brought it on yourself: The joint effects of message type, stigma, and responsibility attribution on attitudes toward medical cannabis. The Journal of Communication, 67(2), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12287
23.
LiX.HouM.HeY.MaM. (2022). People roar at the sight of injustice: Evidences from moral emotions. Current Psychology, 42, 29868–29879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04014-w
24.
LibermanN.TropeY.StephanE. (2007). Psychological distance. In KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 353–381). The Guilford Press.
25.
MenF.FischerB.UrquiaM. L.TarasukV. (2021). Food insecurity, chronic pain, and use of prescription opioids. SSM Population Health, 14, 100768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100768
26.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.
27.
MooreM. D.AliS.Burnich-LineD.GonzalesW.StantonM. V. (2020). Stigma, opioids, and public health messaging: The need to disentangle behavior from identity. American Journal of Public Health, 110(6), 807–810. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305628
28.
MorganD. L. (2019). Basic and advanced focus groups. Sage.
29.
NaeemM.OzuemW.HowellK.RanfagniS. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789
30.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2020). Leading health indicators 2030: Advancing health, equity, and well-being. National Academies Press.
31.
RosemanI. J. (2018). Rejecting the unworthy: The causes, components, and consequences of contempt. In MasonM. (Ed.), The Moral psychology of contempt (pp. 107–129). Rowman & Littlefield.
32.
RosemanI. J.AntoniouA. A.JoseP. E. (1996). Appraisal determinants of emotions: Constructing a more accurate and comprehensive theory. Cognition and Emotion, 10(3), 241–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999396380240
33.
RudolphU.RoeschS.GreitemeyerT.WeinerB. (2004). A meta-analytic review of help giving and aggression from an attributional perspective: Contributions to a general theory of motivation. Cognition and Emotion, 18(6), 815–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930341000248
34.
RudolphU.TscharaktschiewN. (2014). An attributional analysis of moral emotions: Naïve scientists and everyday judges. Emotion Review, 6(4), 344–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914534507
35.
SaldañaJ. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Sage.
SmithR. H. (2000). Assimilative and contrastive emotional reactions to upward and downward social comparisons. In SulsJ.WheelerL. (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research (pp. 173–200). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4237-7_10
38.
SussmanD. (2018). Above and beneath contempt. In MasonM. (Ed.), The moral psychology of contempt (pp. 153–172). Rowman & Littlefield.
ThomasE. F.McGartyC.MavorK. I. (2009). Transforming “apathy into movement”: The role of prosocial emotions in motivating action for social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 310–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309343290
41.
TscharaktschiewN.RudolphU. (2016). The who and whom of help giving: An attributional model integrating the help giver and the help recipient. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(1), 90–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2135
42.
TuanA.VisentinM.Di DomenicoG. (2023). Bridging who they are with who they thought they’d be: The effects of Gen Zers’ subjective well-being on their boycott responses to online and offline unethical situations. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 58(2–3), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968221136862
43.
TwengeJ. M. (2017). iGen: Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy—and completely unprepared for adulthood—and what that means for the rest of us (2nd ed.). Atria Books.
van de VenN.ZeelenbergM.PietersR. (2012). Appraisal patterns of envy and related emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 36(2), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9235-8
46.
WeinerB. (1980). A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help-giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.39.2.186
47.
WeinerB. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573.
48.
WeinerB. (1995). Inferences of responsibility and social motivation. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 27, pp. 1–47). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60402-5
49.
WeinerB. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions: An attributional approach. Psychology Press.
50.
WeinerB. (2018). The legacy of an attribution approach to motivation and emotion: A no-crisis zone. Motivation Science, 4(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000082
51.
WeinerB.PerryR. P.MagnussonJ. (1988). An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(5), 738–748. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.5.738
