Whether Live or Online,Participation is Unequal: Exploring Inequality in the Cultural Participation Patterns in the United States

Abstract

Cultural participation is an individual activity with relevant social dimensions. Democratic societies are concerned about the representation of social groups in cultural audiences and promote policies to increase participation focusing on planning aspects, such as in creative placemaking, or educational policies and social interventions targeted at some underrepresented social groups. Using the data derived from the 2017 Survey of Public Participation in the Arts from the United States, we estimate generalized entropy indexes to explore the more relevant dimensions to explain divides in cultural participation across the U.S. adult population, considering geographical and sociodemographic variables. Cultural engagement is characterized by the participation by highbrow, lowbrow, passive, active, live, and digital activities. Overall, we find that spatial and racial characteristics are not the most relevant, while education appears to be the most important source to explain access inequality. The pattern of digital participation is remarkably similar to the pattern of physical participation, thus showing some evidence that the divide and stratification of cultural practices in the real world translates to digital practices.

Keywords

2017 Survey of Public Participation in the Arts entropy indexes inequality cultural participation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bertacchini

Venturini

Zotti

(2021). Drivers of cultural participation of immigrants: Evidence from an Italian survey. Journal of Cultural Economics, 46(1), 1–44.

Bleichrodt

(1997). Health utility indices and equity considerations. Journal of Health Economics, 16(1), 65–91.

Blume-Kohout

M. E.

Leonard

S. R.

Novak-Leonard

J. L.

(2015). When going gets tough: Barriers and motivations affecting arts attendance (Report No. 59). National Endowment for the Arts.

Brook

(2016). Spatial equity and cultural participation: How access influences attendance at museums and galleries in London. Cultural Trends, 25(1), 21–34.

Brook

O’Brien

Taylor

(2020). Culture is bad for you. Manchester University Press.

Büchi

Hargittai

(2022). A need for considering digital inequality when studying social media use and well-being. Social Media + Society, 8(1), 20563051211069125. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211069125

Busby

Tanberk

Cooper

(2022). Broadbandnow estimates availability for all 50 states confirms that more than 42 million Americans do not have access to broadband, BroadbandNow Report, May 5, 2021 (updated May 6, 2022).

Campagna

Caperna

Montalto

(2020). Does culture make a better citizen? Exploring the relationship between cultural and civic participation in Italy. Social Indicators Research, 149(2), 657–686.

Coulangeon

(2013). Changing policies, challenging theories and persisting inequalities: Social disparities in cultural participation in France from 1981 to 2008. Poetics, 41(2), 177–209.

10.

Cowell

F. A.

Flachaire

(2017). Inequality with ordinal data. Economica, 84(334), 290–321.

11.

De la Vega

Suarez-Fernández

Boto-García

Prieto-Rodríguez

(2020). Playing a play: Online and live performing arts consumers profiles and the role of supply constraints. Journal of Cultural Economics, 44(3), 425–450.

12.

Evans

(2016). Participation and provision in arts & culture – Bridging the divide. Cultural Trends, 25(1), 2–20.

13.

Federal Communications Commission. (2019). Broadband Deployment Report. Retrieved July 29, 2022, from http://www.fcc.gov/reports-research/reports/broadband-progress-reports/2019-broadband-deployment-report

14.

Gakidou

King

(2002). Measuring total health inequality: Adding individual variation to group-level differences. International Journal for Equity in Health, 1(1), 1–12.

15.

Goesling

Firebaugh

(2004). The trend in international health inequality. Population and Development Review, 30(1), 131–146.

16.

Hargittai

(2021). Handbook of digital inequality. Edward Elgar.

17.

Jann

(2020). dstat: Stata module to compute summary statistics and distribution functions including standard errors and optional covariate balancing. Retrieved May 24, 2023, from http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s458874.html

18.

Jancovich

Stevenson

(2021). Failure seems to be the hardest word to say. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 27(7), 967–981.

19.

Katz-Gerro

(2006). Comparative evidence of inequality in cultural preferences gender, class, and family status. Sociological Spectrum, 26(1), 63–83.

20.

National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). (2021). Our town: A framework for understanding and measuring the National Endowment for the Arts creative placemaking grants program. National Endowment for the Arts. Retrieved May 24, 2023, from https://www.arts.gov/sites/default/files/NEA-Our-Town-Resource-Guide-2.5.2021.pdf

21.

Novak-Leonard

J. L.

O’Malley

M. K.

Truong

(2015). Minding the gap: Elucidating the disconnect between arts participation metrics and arts engagement within immigrant communities. Cultural Trends, 24(2), 112–121.

22.

Otte

(2019). Bonding or bridging? On art participation and social cohesion in a rural region of the Netherlands. Poetics, 76, 101355.

23.

Pradhan

Sahn

D. E.

Younger

S. D.

(2003). Decomposing world health inequality. Journal of Health Economics, 22(2), 271–293.

24.

Peukert

(2019). The next wave of digital technological change and the cultural industries. Journal of Cultural Economics, 43(2), 189–210.

25.

Pew Research Center. (2021). Internet/Broadband Factsheet. Retrieved on July 29 2022 from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/

26.

Reeves

(2019). How class identities shape highbrow consumption: A cross-national analysis of 30 European countries and regions. Poetics, 76, 101361.

27.

Salganik

M. J.

Dodds

P. S.

Watts

D. J.

(2006). Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science, 311(5762), 854–856.

28.

Shorrocks

A. F.

(1980). The class of additively decomposable inequality measures. Econometrica, 48(3), 613–625.

29.

Suarez-Fernandez

Prieto-Rodriguez

Perez-Villadoniga

M. J.

(2020). The changing role of education as we move from popular to highbrow culture. Journal of Cultural Economics, 44(2), 189–212.

30.

Theil

(1967). Economics and information theory. North Holland.

31.

UNESCO. (2018). Handbook on measuring inequity in education. UNESCO Institute of Cultural Statistics.

32.

Van Hek

Kraaykamp

. (2013). Cultural consumption across countries: A multi-level analysis of social inequality in highbrow culture in Europe. Poetics, 41(4), 323–341.

33.

Van Deursen

A. J.

Van Dijk

J. A.

Peter

. (2015). Increasing inequalities in what we do online: A longitudinal cross sectional analysis of Internet activities among the Dutch population (2010 to 2013) over gender, age, education, and income. Telematics and informatics, 32(2), 25.

34.

Vandenplas

Picone

(2021). Media as the great emancipators? Exploring relations between media repertoires and cultural participation in Flanders. Convergence, 27(5), 1439–1461.

35.

Yates

Lockley

(2018). Social media and social class. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(9), 1291–1316.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB