The structured inequalities built into our sociotechnical institutions shape access to knowledge. During the COVID-19 pandemic, knowledge acquisition was shaped by news sources, class, and race. Through analysis of nationally representative data using logistic models, this study reveals how the use of different news sources differentially shapes access to accurate knowledge about COVID-19 topics for different demographics. Those who rely on informal and local news sources have the largest knowledge gaps about these topics, while those who seek information from national or international news outlets and politicians have the most accurate knowledge. Race and class influence knowledge of government operations, public health, and science of COVID-19. In particular, Black people, people with less education, and those with lower incomes are significantly less likely to have accurate knowledge about COVID-19, all else equal. These findings have implications for knowledge dissemination that impacts public health, as well as for how news media target different audiences in an increasingly fractured landscape.
AnannyM. (2020). Advocating for what? The nonprofit press and models of the public. In PowellW. W.BromleyP. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 521–538). Stanford University Press.
2.
ArcherK. J.LemeshowS. (2006). Goodness-of-fit test for a logistic regression model fitted using survey sample data. Stata Journal, 6(1), 97–105.
3.
BachmannP.EiseneggerM.IngenhoffD. (2021). Defining and measuring news media quality: Comparing the content perspective and the audience perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(1), 9–37.
4.
BakerJ. O.PerryS. L.WhiteheadA. L. (2020). Crusading for moral authority: Christian nationalism and opposition to science. Sociological Forum, 35(3), 587–607.
5.
BaumM. A.LinJ.OgnyanovaK.ChweH.QuintanaA.LazerD.DruckmanJ.PerlisR. H.SantillanaM.Della VolpeJ.SimonsonM.GreenJ. (2020). Report #13: Public trust in institutions and vaccine acceptance. The state of the nation: A 50-state COVID-19 survey. https://osf.io/qzsxn
6.
BaumM.OgnyanovaK.ChweH.QuintanaA.PerlisR. H.LazerD.DruckmanJ.SantillanaM.LinJ.Della VolpeJ.SimonsonM. D.GreenJ. (2020). Report #14: Misinformation and vaccine acceptance. The state of the nation: A 50-state COVID-19 survey. https://osf.io/w974j/
7.
BritzJ. J. (2004). To know or not to know: A moral reflection on information poverty. Journal of Information Science, 30(3), 192–204.
8.
CamicC.GrossN. (2001). The new sociology of ideas. In BlauJ. R. (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to sociology (pp. 236–249). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
9.
CaseD. O.GivenL. M. (2016). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (4th ed.). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
10.
CooperL. A.StoneyC. M. (2021). Messages to increase COVID-19 knowledge in communities of color: What matters most?Annals of Internal Medicine, 174(4), 554–555.
11.
DeaneJ. (2005). Media, democracy and the public sphere. In HemerO.TufteT. (Eds.), Media & glocal change: Rethinking communication for development (pp. 177–192). Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales.
DiMaggioP. J. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263–287.
14.
EubanksV. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.
15.
EvansJ. H. (2018). Morals not knowledge: Recasting the contemporary U.S. conflict between religion and science. University of California Press.
16.
EvansJ. H.EvansM. S. (2008). Religion and science: Beyond the epistemological conflict narrative. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 87–105.
17.
EvansJ. H.HargittaiE. (2020). Who Doesn’t Trust Fauci? The Public’s Belief in the Expertise and Shared Values of Scientists in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 6, 237802312094733.
18.
FischerS.JaidkaK.LelkesY. (2020). Auditing local news presence on Google News. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(12), 1236–1244.
19.
FisherC. (2016). The trouble with ‘trust’ in news media. Communication Research and Practice, 2(4), 451–465.
20.
FreeseJ.KingM. M. (2018). Institutionalizing transparency. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 4, 1–7.
21.
FridmanI.LucasN.HenkeD.ZiglerC. K. (2020). Association between public knowledge about COVID-19, trust in information sources, and adherence to social distancing: Cross-sectional survey. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 6(3), e22060.
22.
GambleV. N. (1997). Under the shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and health care. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1773–1778.
23.
HINTS. (2008). Only 28% know lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths 84%. http://hints.cancer.gov
24.
HowellJ.EmersonM. O. (2017). So what “should” we use? Evaluating the impact of five racial measures on markers of social inequality. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 3(1), 12–30.
MannheimK. (1929). Ideology and utopia (WirthL.ShilsE., Trans.). Harcourt, Brace & Co., Inc.
28.
McFaddenS. A. M.MalikA. A.AguoluO. G.WillebrandK. S.OmerS. B. (2020). Perceptions of the adult US population regarding the novel coronavirus outbreak. PLoS ONE, 15(4), 1–6.
29.
Metaxa-KakavouliD.Torres-EcheverryN. (2017). Google’s role in spreading fake news and misinformation. SSRN working paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3062984
NielsenR. K. (2017). Digital news as forms of knowledge: a new chapter in the sociology of knowledge. In BoczkowskiP.AndersonC. W. (Eds.), Remaking the news: Essays on the future of journalism scholarship in the digital age. MIT Press. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2969115
35.
NobleS. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
36.
O’ConnorC.WeatherallJ. O. (2019). The misinformation age: How false beliefs spread. Yale University Press.
O’NeilC. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown.
39.
PariserE. (2011). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. Penguin.
40.
PerryS. L.BakerJ. O.GrubbsJ. B. (2021). Ignorance or culture war? Christian nationalism and scientific illiteracy. Public Understanding of Science, 30(8), 930–946.
Price-HaywoodE. G.BurtonJ.FortD.SeoaneL. (2020). Hospitalization and mortality among Black patients and White patients with Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(26), 2534–2543.
45.
RobinsonL.SchulzJ.BlankG.RagneddaM.OnoH.HoganB.MeschG. S.CottenS. R.KretchmerS. B.HaleT. M.DrabowiczT.YanP.WellmanB.HarperM.-G.Quan-HaaseA.DunnH. S.CasilliA. A.TubaroP.CarvathR.KhilnaniA. (2020). Digital inequalities 2.0: Legacy inequalities in the information age. First Monday, (July).
46.
RoosJ. M. (2016). Contested knowledge and spillover. Social Currents, 4(4), 360–379.
47.
RothgerberH.WilsonT.WhaleyD.RosenfeldD.HumphreyM.MooreA.BihlA. (2020). Politicizing the COVID-19 pandemic: Ideological differences in adherence to social distancing. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://psyarxiv.com/k23cv/
SullivanL. S. (2020). Trust, risk, and race in American medicine. Hastings Center Report, 50(1), 18–26.
50.
SwidlerA.ArditiJ. (1994). The new sociology of knowledge. Annual Review of Sociology, 20, 305–329.
51.
TruncellitoD. A. (2021). Epistemology. In FieserJ.DowdenB.MathesonJ. (Eds.), Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/epistemo/
52.
TryonC. (2020). Sinclair broadcasting as mini-media empire: Media regulation, disinfomercials, and the rise of Trumpism. Media, Culture and Society, 42(7–8), 1377–1391.
53.
YuL. (2006). Understanding information inequality: Making sense of the literature of the information and digital divides. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 38(4), 229–252.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
