Participatory budgeting (PB) is designed to leverage local knowledge about community needs and translate spending preferences into tangible community development action by giving communities control over key budgetary resources. Moreover, PB participants learn about decision-making processes in development policy and can organize to pursue their communities’ interests beyond the PB process by engaging with government and civil society. PB advocates hope that infrastructure, service delivery, and, ultimately, well-being will improve for underserved communities and groups that have been historically excluded from the perspective of representative democracy. This article presents the theoretical logic connecting PB to community development and summarizes the global evidence from studies that test the theoretical propositions above. We find evidence for PB’s impact on community development performance in several important contexts. However, we also note that many hypotheses have yet to be tested in rigorous, large-N, comparative studies. There is thus considerable room to evaluate PB’s impact in the future.
AbersR. (2000). Inventing local democracy: Grassroots politics in Brazil. Lynne Reinner.
2.
AceronJ. (2019). Pitfalls of aiming to empower the bottom from thetTop: The case of Philippine PB. G-Watch and Accountability Research Center.
3.
AvritzerL. (2002). Democracy and the public space in Latin America. Princeton University Press.
4.
BaiocchiG. (2005). Militants and citizens: The politics of participatory democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford University Press.
5.
BaiocchiG.GanuzaE. (2017). Popular democracy: The paradox of participation. Stanford University Press.
6.
BaiocchiG.HellerP.SilvaS. (2011). Bootstrapping democracy: Transforming local governance and civil society in Brazil. Stanford University Press.
7.
CabannesY. (2019). Another city is possible. University of Chicago Press.
8.
DiasN.EnríquezS.JúlioS. (2019). The participatory budgeting world atlas. Epopeia.
9.
FoxJonathan (2015). Social Accountability: what does the evidence really say?World Development.
10.
GarridoF.MontecinosE. (2018). El presupuesto participativo en Chile y República Dominicana. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 27(2), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.26851/rucp.28.3
11.
GibsonC.WoolcockM. (2008). Empowerment, deliberative development, and local-level politics in Indonesia: Participatory projects as a source of countervailing power. Studies in Comparative International Development, 43(2), 151–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-008-9021-0
12.
GoldfrankB. (2011). Deepening local democracy in Latin America: Participation, decentralization and the left. Pennsylvania State University Press.
13.
GonçalvesS. (2014). The effects of participatory budgeting on municipal expenditures and infant mortality in Brazil. World Development, 53(1), 94-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.009.
14.
HagelskampC.RhinehartC.SillmanR.SchleiferD. (2016). Public spending, by the people: Participatory budgeting in the United States and Canada (pp. 36–46). Public Agenda.
15.
HagelskampC.SillimanR.GodfreyE. B.SchleiferD. (2020). Shifting priorities: participatory budgeting in New York city. New Political Science, 42(2), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2020.1773689
16.
HongS.ChoB. S. (2018). Citizen participation and the redistribution of public goods. Public Administration, 96(3), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12521
17.
LernerJ. (2014). Everyone counts: Could ‘participatory budgeting change democracy?Cornell University Press.
18.
LimP. (2017). Participatory budgeting in Philippine. Making all voices count. Institute of Development Studies.
MansuriGhazalaRaoVijayendra (2013). Can participation be induced? Some evidence from developing countries. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.
21.
MarquettiA.CamposG. A.PiresR. (2008). Democracia participativa e redistribuição: Análise de experiências de orçamento participativo. Xamã.
22.
McNultyStephanie (2011). Voice and Vote. Stanford University Press.
23.
McNultyS. (2013). Participatory democracy? Exploring Peru’s efforts to engage civil society in local governance. Latin American Politics and Society, 55(3), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2013.00203.x
24.
McNultyS. L. (2015). Barriers to participation: Exploring gender in Peru’s participatory budget process. The Journal of Development Studies, 51(11), 1429–1443. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2015.1010155
25.
McNultyS. (2018). Embedded exclusions: Exploring gender equality in Peru’s participatory democratic framework. Global Discourse, 8(3), 532–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2018.1521137
MontambeaultF. (2019). “It was once a radical democratic proposal”: Theories of gradual institutional change in Brazilian participatory budgeting. Latin American Politics and Society, 61(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2018.58
28.
NgC. (Ed.). (2015) Gender responsive and participatory budgeting: Imperatives for equitable public expenditure. (Vol. 22). Springer.
29.
NoW. (2017). Redistribution and deliberation in mandated participatory governance: The case of participatory budgeting in Seoul [Dissertation]. Arizona State University.
30.
NoWonHsuehLily (2020). No, Won, and Lily Hsueh. "How a participatory process with inclusive structural design allocates resources toward poor neighborhoods: the case of participatory budgeting in Seoul, South Korea. International Review of Administrative Sciences.
31.
NylenW. (2003). Participatory democracy versus elitist democracy: Lessons from Brazil. Palgrave.
32.
PeckJamieTheodoreNik (2015). Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2015). Fast policy: Experimental statecraft at the thresholds of neoliberalism. University of Minnesota Press.
33.
PinningtonE.LernerJ.SchugurenskyD. (2009). Participatory budgeting in North America: The case of Guelph, Canada. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 21(3), 454–483. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbafm-21-03-2009-b005
34.
Public Agenda (2016). Why let the people decide? Elected officials on participatory budgeting. Public Agenda and the Kettering Foundation.
35.
PutnamR. D.LeonardiR.NanettiR. Y. (1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
36.
RomãoW. D. M. (2011). Conselheiros do Orçamento Participativo nas franjas da sociedade política. Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, 84(2), 219-244. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-64452011000300008.
37.
RossMichael (2006). Is Democracy Good for the Poor?American Journal of Political Science.
38.
SchattschneiderE.E. (1960). The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. The Dryden Press.
39.
ShahA. (2007). Participatory budgeting. World Bank.
40.
ShybalkinaI.BifulcoR. (2019). Does participatory budgeting change the share of public funding to low income neighborhoods?Public Budgeting & Finance, 39(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12212
SuC. (2016). Re-Engaging the disenfranchised: Participatory budgeting in the United States. Brookings Institution Press.
43.
TouchtonM.WamplerB. (2014). Improving social well-being through new democratic institutions. Comparative Political Studies, 47(10), 1442–1469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013512601
44.
WamplerB. (2007). Participatory budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, cooperation, and accountability. Pennsylvania State University Press.
45.
WamplerB. (2015). Activating democracy in Brazil: Popular participation, social justice, and interlocking institutions. University of Notre Dame Press.
46.
WamplerB.AvritzerL. (2004). Participatory publics: Civil society and new institutions in democratic Brazil. Comparative Politics, 36(3), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.2307/4150132
47.
WamplerB.McNultyS.TouchtonM. (2021). Participatory budgeting in global perspective. Oxford University Press.
48.
WamplerB.TouchtonM. (2019). Designing institutions to improve social well-being: Evidence from across Brazil’s participatory budgeting programs. European Journal of Political Research, 58(3), 915–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12313
