This study sheds light on the relationship between cognition and patience by documenting that the correlation between cognitive abilities and delay discounting is weaker for the same group of individuals if choices are incentivized. This study conjectures that higher cognitive effort, which induces higher involvement of the cognitive system, moderates the relationship between patience and cognition. For 107 participants drawn from the adult population in Tbilisi, this study examines the relationship between various measures of cognitive ability and that of patience. Specifically, we consider the relationship between the Cognitive Reflection Test, a numeracy test, self-reported math ability measure, enumerators’ assessments, and incentivized and hypothetical trade-offs between smaller-sooner and larger-later payments.
AckermanP. L.BeierM. E.BoyleM. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs?Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 30-60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.30
2.
BenhabibJ.BisinA. (2005). Modeling internal commitment mechanisms and self-control: A neuroeconomics approach to consumption-saving decisions. Games and Economic Behavior, 52(2), 460-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2004.10.004
3.
BenjaminD. J.BrownS. A.ShapiroJ. M. (2013). Who is “behavioral”? Cognitive ability and anomalous preferences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(6), 1231-1255. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12055
4.
BernheimB. D.RangelA. (2004). Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes. American Economic Review, 94(5), 1558-1590. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828043052222
5.
BorghansL.GolsteynB. H. (2006). Time discounting and the body mass index: Evidence from the Netherlands. Economics & Human Biology, 4(1), 39-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2005.10.001
6.
CarpenterP.JustM. A.ShellP. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the raven progressive matrices test. Psychological Review, 97(3), 404-431. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.404
7.
ConwayA. R. A.KaneM. J.EngleR. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(12), 547-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.005
8.
CornsweetT. N. (1962). The staircase-method in psychophysics. American Journal of Psychology, 75(3), 485-491. https://doi.org/10.2307/1419876
9.
De DreuC. K. W.GërxhaniK.SchramA. (2019). Anticipating peer ranking causes hormonal adaptations that benefit cognitive performance (Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 2019-040/I). https://ideas.repec.org/p/tin/wpaper/20190040.html
DohmenT.FalkA.HuffmanD.SundeU. (2010). Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability?American Economic Review, 100(3), 1238-1260. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.1238
12.
FalkA.BeckerA.DohmenT.EnkeB.HuffmanD.SundeU. (2018). Global evidence on economic preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(4), 1645-1692.
13.
FalkA.BeckerA.DohmenT.HuffmanD.SundeU. (2016). The preference survey module: A validated instrument for measuring risk, time, and social preferences (IZA Discussion Paper No. 9674). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2725035
FudenbergD.LevineD. K. (2006). A dual-self model of impulse control. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1449-1476. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1449
16.
FunderD.BlockJ. (1989). The role of ego-control, ego-resiliency, and IQ in delay of gratification in adolescence. Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1041-1050. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1041
17.
GarbarinoE. C.EdellJ. A. (1997). Cognitive effort, affect, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 147-158. https://doi.org/10.1086/209500
HinsonJ.JamesonT.WhitneyP. (2003). Impulsive decision making and working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(2), 298-306. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.298
21.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
22.
KirbyC.WinstonG.SantiestebanM. (2005). Impatience and grades: Delay-discount rates correlate negatively with college GPA. Learning and Individual Differences, 15(3), 213-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.01.003
23.
McClureS. M.LaibsonD. I.LoewensteinG.CohenJ. D. (2004). Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306(5695), 503-507. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100907
24.
ParkerA.FischoffB. (2005). Decision-making competence: External validation through an individual-differences approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.481
ShodaY.MischelW.PeakeP. (1990). Predicting adolescent cognitive and self-regulatory competencies from pre-school delay of gratification: Identifying diagnostic conditions. Developmental Psychology, 26(6), 978-986. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.6.978
27.
SutterM.KocherM. G.Glätzle-RützlerD.TrautmannS. T. (2013). Impatience and uncertainty: Experimental decisions predict adolescents’ field behavior. American Economic Review, 103(1), 510-531. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.1.510
28.
WestbrookA. J.BraverT. S. (2015). Cognitive effort: A neuroeconomic approach. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(2), 395-415. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0334-y
