The Rhetorical Impact of the Scopes Trial’s Interconnected Public Memory Places

Abstract

In 1925, the Scopes Trial, one of the first legal battles over teaching evolution in public schools, was held in Dayton, Tennessee. Dayton commemorates the trial with a trinity of sites: The Scopes Trial Museum, the Scopes Trial Trail, and Bryan College. I argue that the trail connects the two other public memory places physically and symbolically, inviting visitors to follow the journey of William Jennings Bryan’s death at the Scopes Trial Museum to a rebirth of creationism at Bryan College. This inquiry attends to the influence of creationist messages at historical landmarks in shaping public understanding of the past. Furthermore, I explore how a museum experience can be felt across multiple memory places to elicit subject positions in visitors.

Keywords

public memory material rhetoric subject positions creationism controversy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

J. C.

(2006). Epideictic and its cultural reception. In Prelli

L. J.

(Ed.), Rhetorics of display (pp. 293-310). University of South Carolina Press.

Aiello

Dickinson

(2014). Beyond authenticity: A visual-material analysis of locality in the global redesign of Starbucks stores. Visual Communication, 13(3), 303-321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357214530054

Answers in Genesis. (2018, December 27). Looking ahead: What’s coming in 2019? https://arkencounter.com/blog/2018/12/27/looking-ahead-whats-coming-in-2019/

Barry

(1998). On interactivity: Consumers, citizens and culture. In Macdonald

(Ed.), The politics of display: Museums, science, culture (pp. 98-117). Routledge.

Blair

(1999). Contemporary US memorial sites as exemplars of rhetoric’s materiality. In Selzer

Crowley

(Eds.), Rhetorical bodies (pp. 16-57). University of Wisconsin Press.

Blair

Jeppeson

M. S.

Pucci

Jr. (1991). Public memorializing in postmodernity: The Vietnam Veterans Memorial as prototype. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 77(3), 263-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639109383960

Bloomfield

E. F.

(2017). Ark Encounter as material apocalyptic rhetoric: Contemporary creationist strategies on board Noah’s Ark. Southern Communication Journal, 82(5), 263-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2017.1360384

Burke

(1970). The rhetoric of religion: Studies in logology. University of California Press.

Burke

(1984). Attitudes toward history. University of California Press.

10.

Ceccarelli

(2011). Manufactured scientific controversy: Science, rhetoric, and public debate. Rhetoric Public Affairs, 14(2), 195-228. https://doi.org/10.1353/rap.2010.0222

11.

Charity Navigator. (2019). Answers in Genesis. https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=5214

12.

Dickinson

(1997). Memories for sale: Nostalgia and the construction of identity in Old Pasadena. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 83(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639709384169

13.

Dickinson

Ott

B. L.

Aoki

(2006). Spaces of remembering and forgetting: The Reverent Eye/I at the Plains Indian Museum. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 3(1), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420500505619

14.

Fausset

(2017, July 14). At site of Scopes Trial, Darrow Statue belatedly joins Bryan’s. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/14/us/darrow-bryan-dayton-tennessee-scopes-statues.html

15.

Flaherty

(2014, May 6). Too small a box. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/05/06/professors-and-students-bryan-college-protest-changes-statement-faith

16.

Foss

(1966). Death, sacrifice, and tragedy. University of Nebraska Press.

17.

Funk

Smith

Masci

(2019, February 12). How many creationists are there in America? Scientific American. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/how-many-creationists-are-there-in-america/

18.

Gentile

J. S.

(2009). The pilgrim soul: Herman Melville’s Moby-Dick as pilgrimage. Text and Performance Quarterly, 29(4), 403-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462930903244711

19.

Goodnight

G. T.

(2005). Science and technology controversy: A rationale for inquiry. Argumentation and Advocacy, 42(1), 26-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2005.11821636

20.

Grant

(2016, March 7). Paper containing creationist language pulled. The Scientist. https://www.the-scientist.com/the-nutshell/paper-containing-creationist-language-pulled-33921

21.

Gross

A. G.

(2005). Presence as argument in the public sphere. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 35(2), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940509391308

22.

Gruber

D. R.

(2014). The (digital) majesty of all under heaven: Affective constitutive rhetoric at the Hong Kong Museum of History’s multi-media exhibition of terracotta warriors. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 44(2), 148-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2014.888462

23.

Hess

(2011). Critical-rhetorical ethnography: Rethinking the place and process of rhetoric. Communication Studies, 62(2), 127-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2011.529750

24.

Jackson

(2007). Jonathan Edwards goes to hell (house): Fear appeals in American Evangelism. Rhetoric Review, 26(1), 42-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350190709336685

25.

Jaffe

. (2015, December 18). How the fight to teach creationism in public schools has . . . evolved. Bloomberg CityLab. https://www.citylab.com/politics/2015/12/creationism-evolution-darwin-intelligent-design-public-school-science/420825/

26.

Jamieson

K. H.

Campbell

K. K.

(1982). Rhetorical hybrids: Fusions of generic elements. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 68(2), 146-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638209383600

27.

Kelly

C. R.

Hoerl

K. E.

(2012). Genesis in hyperreality: Legitimizing disingenuous controversy at the creation museum. Argumentation and Advocacy, 48(3), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2012.11821759

28.

Lake

R. A.

(1984). Order and disorder in anti-abortion rhetoric: A logological view. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(4), 425-443. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638409383708

29.

Lee

D. H.

(2019). A cardiology exhibit at a science museum, viewed as speech acts in sequence. Health Communication, 34(7), 707-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1432962

30.

Let the Trial Be Dignified. (1925, July 23). Chattanooga Daily News.

31.

Lynch

(2013). “Prepare to believe”: The Creation Museum as embodied conversion narrative. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0001

32.

Macdonald

(Ed.). (1998). The politics of display: Museums, science, culture. Routledge.

33.

Maddux

(2013). Fundamentalist fool or populist paragon? William Jennings Bryan and the campaign against evolutionary theory. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 16(3), 489-520. https://doi.org/10.1353/rap.2013.0026

34.

Maurantonio

(2014). The politics of memory. In Kenski

Jamieson

K. H.

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication (pp. 1-17). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.026

35.

McGeough

R. E.

Palczewski

C. H.

Lake

R. A.

(2015). Oppositional memory practices: U.S. memorial spaces as arguments over public memory. Argumentation & Advocacy, 51(4), 231-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2015.11821852

36.

Milligan

(2020). Religious heritage sites of Southeast Tennessee. https://tennesseerivervalleygeotourism.org/entries/religous-heritage-sites-of-southeast-tennessee/56522e78-564e-4df2-a076-42dc5cabd9dd

37.

Moore

(2000). The revival of creationism in the United States. Journal of Biological Education, 35(1), 17-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2000.9655730

38.

Offord

(2018, May 25). Arizona moves to alter wording about evolution in education. The Scientist. https://www.the-scientist.com/the-nutshell/arizona-moves-to-alter-wording-about-evolution-in-education-36652

39.

Oransky

(2019, March 5). Journal retracts creationist paper “because it was published in error.” Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/2019/03/05/journal-retracts-creationist-paper-because-it-was-published-in-error/

40.

Ott

B. L.

Bean

Marin

(2016). On the aesthetic production of atmospheres: The rhetorical workings of biopower at The CELL. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 13(4), 346-362. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2016.1195505

41.

Panicker

(2019, April 18). Inside the Dallas museum where faith meets science. WFAA. https://www.wfaa.com/article/news/local/inside-the-dallas-museum-where-faith-meets-science/287-253a5519-bd1b-4506-8362-af9d0c69f138

42.

Pennock

R. T.

(1996). Naturalism, evidence and creationism: The case of Phillip Johnson. Biology and Philosophy, 11(4), 543-559. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138334

43.

Prelli

L. J.

(2006). Rhetorics of display. University of South Carolina Press.

44.

Rhea County Heritage. (n.d.). About. https://www.rheacountyheritage.com/about

45.

Sharer

W. B.

(1999). Disintegrating bodies of knowledge: Historical material and revisionary histories of rhetoric. In Selzer

Crowley

(Eds.), Rhetorical bodies (pp. 120-142). University of Wisconsin Press.

46.

Today is the 50th Anniversary of the Start of the Famous “Monkey Trial” of John Scopes in Dayton. (1975, July 10). The Chattanooga Times. William Jennings Bryan Reading Room, Bryan College, Dayton, Tennessee.

47.

Trollinger

S. L.

Trollinger

W. V.

(2016). Righting America at the Creation Museum. Johns Hopkins University Press.

48.

U.S. National Park Service. (2020, August 25). List of NHLs by state. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalhistoriclandmarks/list-of-nhls-by-state.htm

49.

West

(2015, February 18). Fossils and faith: The Creation Evidence Museum of Texas. Houston Chronicle. https://www.houstonchronicle.com/local/gray-matters/article/Creation-Evidence-Museum-of-Texas-6086067.php

50.

Woods

C. S.

Ewalt

J. P.

Baker

S. J.

(2013). A matter of regionalism: Remembering Brandon Teena and Willa Cather at the Nebraska History Museum. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 99(3), 341-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2013.806818

51.

Yeager

(2019, November 11). Paper used in creationist teaching retracted after 30 years. The Scientist. https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/paper-used-in-creationist-teaching-retracted-after-30-years-66703