Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article begins by examining the origins and modern standing of nonlawyer judges. It moves on to recite criticisms levied at nonlawyer judges and the reasons that large-scale elimination of nonlawyer judges is unlikely in the near future. Finally, it concludes by offering procedural fairness training as an attainable and highly effective tool to improve the performance of nonlawyer judges.

Keywords

nonlawyer judges procedural fairness therapeutic jurisprudence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alcoholics Anonymous. (2001). Alcoholics anonymous: The big book (4th ed.).

Allan

T. R. S.

(1998). Procedural fairness and the duty of respect. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 18(3), 497-515. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/18.3.497

American Bar Association. (2018). New ABA data reveals rise in number of U.S. lawyers, 15 percent increase since 2008. https://www.americanbar.org/news/abanews/aba-news-archives/2018/05/new_aba_data_reveals/

Anderson

(2003). Law school on your terms. University of Detroit Mercy Law Review, 80, 458-461.

Ashman

Lee

D. L.

(1977). Non-lawyer judges: The long road north. Chicago Kent Law Review, 53(3), 565-595.

Brockmeyer Law Offices. (n.d.). Ronald D. Brockmeyer. www.brockmeyerlaw.com/about-us/ronald-j-brockmeyer

Brockner

(2002). Making sense of procedural fairness: How high procedural fairness can reduce or heighten the influence of outcome favorability. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 58-76.

Burke

Leben

(2007). Procedural fairness: A key ingredient In public satisfaction. Court Review, 44(1/2), 4-25.

Carpenter

Pochkhanawala

Menjou

(2020). Municipal fines and fees: A 50-state survey of state laws. https://ij.org/report/fines-and-fees-home

10.

City of Gunnison. (n.d.). Municipal Court. www.gunnisonco.gov/government/municipal_court/index.php

11.

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-6-106(1)(a).

12.

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-6-203(3).

13.

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-6-310(2).

14.

Court Statistics Project. (2019). State court caseload digest: 2017 Data. www.courtstatistics.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/24014/csp-2017-data-spreads-for-viewing.pdf

15.

Cranney

(2019). These judges can have less training than barbers but still decide thousands of cases each year. Pro Publica. www.propublica.org/article/these-judges-can-have-less-training-than-barbers-but-still-decide-thousands-of-cases-each-year

16.

Davis v. Montana, 2016 WL 6833881 (2016).

17.

Decety

Cowell

J. M.

(2015). Empathy, justice, and moral behavior. AJOB Neuroscience, 6(3), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2015.1047055

18.

Dinzeo

(2020). Revised California budget slashes millions from court funding. Courthouse News Service. www.courthousenews.com/revised-california-budget-slashes-millions-from-court-funding/

19.

Dougherty

G. W.

Lindquist

S. A.

Bradbury

M. D.

(2006). Evaluating performance in state judicial institutions: Trust and confidence in the Georgia judiciary. State and Local Government Review, 38(3), 176-190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X0603800305

20.

Ekman

O’Sullivan

(1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46, 913-920. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.46.9.913

21.

Farrar

J. J.

Dibble

T. G.

Zinns

Wilfhart

(1982). Wisconsin Municipal Court study: Final report. National Center for State Courts.

22.

Felix

(2020). COVID-19 challenges state and local government finances. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. www.kansascityfed.org/en/publications/research/eb/articles/2020/covid-19-challenges-state-local-government-finances

23.

Fla. Stat. § 34.021.

24.

Ford

(2017). When your judge isn’t a lawyer. The Atlantic. www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/02/when-your-judge-isnt-a-lawyer/515568/

25.

Gordon v. Justice Court, 12 Cal. 3d 323 (1974).

26.

Gould

J. B.

(2007). Security at what cost? A comparative evaluation of court security. Justice System Journal, 28(1), 62-78.

27.

Gray

(2007). Reaching out or overreaching: Judicial ethics and self-represented litigants. Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary, 27(1), 97-168.

28.

Hand

(1944). The spirit of liberty. Central Park.

29.

Harvard University. (2011). Project implicit. https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html

30.

Heuer

Penrod

Kattan

(2007). The role of societal benefits and fairness concerns among decision makers and decision recipients. Law and Human Behavior, 31(6), 573-610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9084-2

31.

Jaworski

(1975). Judicial intimidation: A threat to the advocate’s independence. Litigation, 1(1), 11-13.

32.

Katz

Haldar

(2016). The pedagogy of trauma informed lawyering. Clinical Law Review, 22, 359-393.

33.

Kay

LaGratta

(2019). Talking about fairness: A planning guide for communities and justice system leaders. www.courtinnovation.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/2019-04/guide_pjrountablenewark_04172019.pdf

34.

Kowarski

(2020). See the price, payoff of law school before enrolling. U.S. News & World Report. www.usnews.com/education/best-graduate-schools/top-law-schools/articles/law-school-cost-starting-salary

35.

Kubits

Zehm

Eckberg

D. A.

Podkopacz

M. R.

(2004). Housing court fairness study. www.mncourts.gov/Documents/4/Public/Research/Housing_Court_Fairness_(2004).pdf

36.

La. Stat. Ann. § 33:441.

37.

Maciag

(2019). Addicted to fines: A special report. www.governing.com/topics/finance/fine-fee-revenues-special-report.html

38.

Mashburn

K. M.

(2004). Caseload and warrant workload analysis of courts of limited jurisdiction in Arkansas. www.ncsc.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0021/15924/mashburnkelley.pdf

39.

Miller

(2020). “Sobering” cuts to state budget eliminate $2b for court construction. The Recorder. www.law.com/therecorder/2020/05/14/sobering-cuts-to-state-budget-eliminate-2b-for-court-construction/

40.

Mont. Code § 3-1-602.

41.

Mont. Code § 3-10-203(2).

42.

Mont. Code § 3-10-207(3).

43.

Murphy

(2017). Procedural justice and its role in promoting voluntary compliance. In Drahos

(Ed.), Regulatory theory: Foundations and applications (pp. 43-58). ANU Press.

44.

National Center for State Courts. (1993). National probate court standards. https://ncsc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/spcts/id/138/rec/1

45.

National Center for State Courts. (2014). The state of state courts 2014. www.ncsc.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/17804/2014-state-of-state-courts-survey-12042014.pdf

46.

National Center for State Courts. (2015). The state of state courts 2015. www.ncsc.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/15833/sosc_2015_presentation.pdf

47.

National Center for State Courts. (2017). The state of state courts 2017. https://www.ncsc.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/17246/state-of-the-state-courts-2017-slides.pdf

48.

National Center for State Courts. (2019). State of the state courts 2019. www.ncsc.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/16443/ncsc_sosc_2019_presentation.pdf

49.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 4.010(2).

50.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 4.010(3).

51.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 4.370.

52.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 5.020(2).

53.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 5.050.

54.

New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct. (2019). New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, Annual Report.

55.

North v. Russell, 427 U.S. 328 (1976).

56.

N.Y. Const. art. 6, § 20(c).

57.

Office for Victims of Crime. (n.d.). Human trafficking task force e-guide. www.ovcttac.gov/taskforceguide/eguide/6-the-role-of-courts/63-trauma-informed-courts/

58.

Olson

S. M.

Huth

D. A.

(1998). Explaining public attitudes toward local courts. Justice System Journal, 20(1), 41-61.

59.

Paraschiv

R.-G.

(2012). The importance of procedural of justice in shaping individuals’ perceptions of the legal system. Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, 4(2), 162-167.

60.

Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency. (2011). Free to tell the truth: Preventing and combating intimidation in court. Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency.

61.

Perlin

M. L.

(2017). “Have you seen dignity?” The story of the development of therapeutic jurisprudence. New Zealand Universities Law Review, 27, 1135-1161. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2932149

62.

Pew Research Center. (2017). Public trust in government remains near historic lows as partisan attitudes shift. www.people-press.org/2017/05/03/public-trust-in-government-remains-near-historic-lows-as-partisan-attitudes-shift/

63.

Provine

D. M.

(1986). Judging credentials: Nonlawyer judges and the politics of professionalism. University of Chicago Press.

64.

Roberts

(2005). Chief Justice Roberts statement: Nomination process. www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/chief-justice-roberts-statement-nomination-process

65.

Ronner

(2002). Songs of validation, voice, and voluntary participation: Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Miranda and juveniles. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 71(1), 89-114.

66.

Ryan

J. P.

Guterman

J. H.

(1977). Lawyer versus nonlawyer town justices: An empirical footnote to North v. Russell. Judicature, 60(6), 272-280.

67.

S.C. Code § 22-1-10(C)(1)(a).

68.

S.C. Code § 22-8-40(B).

69.

Shuman

(1993). Making the world a better place through tort law? Through the therapeutic looking glass. New York Law School Journal of Human Rights, 10(3), 739-758.

70.

Silverman

W. C.

(2020). Now is not the time to defund the courts. New York Law Journal. www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2020/05/29/now-is-not-the-time-to-defund-the-courts/?slreturn=20200519152212

71.

Skitka

L. J.

Hutchinson

Winquist

(2003). Are outcome fairness and outcome favorability distinguishable psychological constructs? A meta-analytic review. Social Justice Research, 16(4), 309-341. 10.1023/A:1026336131206

72.

Smith

Maddan

Price

D. D. P.

Tvedt

(2017). Rush to judgment: How South Carolina’s summary courts fail to protect constitutional rights. National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. www.nacdl.org/getattachment/ab9d6b03-2b45-4235-890e-235461a9bb2d/rush-to-judgment-how-south-carolina-s-summary-courts-fail-to-protect-constitutional-rights.pdf

73.

Steinzor

R. I.

Hornstein

A. D.

(2002). The unplanned obsolescence of American legal education. Temple Law Review, 75, 447-490.

74.

Texas Municipal Courts Association. (n.d.). So, now you’re a judge! www.tmcec.com/public/files/File/Judges/So%20now%20youre%20a%20judge.pdf

75.

Tocqueville

A. d.

(2002). Democracy in America. ( Reeve

, Trans.; Vol. 1). Penn State University. (Original work published 1835)

76.

Tyler

T. R.

(2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice, 30, 283-357. https://doi.org/10.1086/652233

77.

Tyler

T. R.

(2007). Procedural justice and the courts. Court Review, 44, 26-31.

78.

Tyler

T. R.

Huo

Y. J.

(2002). Building trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts through process-based social regulation. Russell Sage Foundation.

79.

U.S. Const., amend. VI.

80.

U.S. Department of Justice. (2015). Investigation of the Ferguson Police Department. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division.

81.

Utah Code § 78A-7-118(1).

82.

Walsh

M. W.

(2020). As virus ravages budgets, states cut and borrow for balance. The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2020/05/14/business/virus-state-budgets.html

83.

Wexler

(1999). The development of therapeutic jurisprudence: From theory to practice. Revista Juridica Universidad de Puerto Rico, 68(3), 691-706.

84.

Wexler

(2016). Guiding court conversation along pathways conductive to rehabilitation: Integrating procedural justice and therapeutic jurisprudence. International Journal of Therapeutic Jurisprudence, 1, 367-372.

85.

Wilkinson

Mallios

Martinson

(2013). Evading justice: The pervasive nature of witness intimidation. www.nationalpublicsafetypartnership.org/Documents/Evading%20Justice-%20The%20Pervasive%20Nature%20of%20Witness%20Intimidation.pdf

Procedural Fairness Is the Foundation for Making Nonlawyer Judges Effective

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References