The Complexities of Criminal Responsibility and Persons With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: How Can Therapeutic Jurisprudence Help?

Abstract

This article examines issues regarding legal capacity and criminal responsibility relating to persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). We examined the case of a 28-year-old male identified as having the mental age of an 8-year-old, accused of four counts of possessing child pornography in Ontario, Canada. If convicted, the offenses carried a minimum mandatory sentence of 1-year imprisonment. The defense attorney argued that since persons are not criminally responsible when they are chronologically less than 12 years old, the same ought to be extended to those with a mental age of less than 12. The Crown prosecutor asserted that the defense’s connection of disability to a lack of capacity reverts our conceptualization of persons with IDD back to a time when they were infantilized. Using therapeutic jurisprudence as a framework, we examined whether problem-solving courts (e.g., mental health court) could be used to address the needs of a person with IDD and offer a different understanding and potential solution to nonjudicial decision makers that satisfies the principles of both criminal responsibility and public safety.

Keywords

criminal responsibility legal capacity persons with disabilities therapeutic jurisprudence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act S.O. (2005). c. 5. https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/05a11

Accessible Canada Act S.C. (2019). s.c. 10. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/A-0.6.pdf

American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. (2019). Frequently asked questions on intellectual disability. https://www.aaidd.org/intellectual-disability/definition/faqs-on-intellectual-disability

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Author.

Arstein-Kerslake

Black

(2020). Right to legal capacity in therapeutic jurisprudence: Insights from critical disability theory and the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 68, Article 101535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101535

Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, (2002). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/536/304/

Barnert

E. S.

Abrams

L. S.

Maxson

Gase

Soung

Carroll

Bath

(2017). Setting a minimum age for juvenile justice jurisdiction in California. International Journal of Prison Health, 13(1), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPH-07-2016-0030

Bloom

Schneider

R. D.

(2017). Mental disorder and the law a primer for legal and mental health professionals. Irwin Law.

Brown

Radford

J. P.

(2015). The growth and decline of institutions for people with developmental disabilities in Ontario: 1876-2009. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 21(2), 7-27.

10.

Canadian Criminal Code, RSC (1985) c C-46. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/C-46.pdf

11.

Chandler

J. A.

(2015). The use of neuroscientific evidence in Canadian criminal proceedings. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2(3), 550-579.

12.

Craigie

(2015). Against a singular understanding of legal capacity: Criminal responsibility and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 40, 6-14.

13.

Degener

(2016). Disability in a human rights context. Laws, 5(3), Article 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws5030035

14.

Devlin

Pothier

(2006). Introduction: Toward a critical theory of dis-citizenship. In Pothier

Devlin

(Eds.), Critical disability theory: Essays in philosophy, politics, policy, and law (pp. 1-22). UBC Press.

15.

Greenspan

Harris

J. C.

Woods

G. W.

(2015). Intellectual disability is “a condition, not a number”: Ethics of IQ cut-offs in psychiatry, human services and law. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 1(3), 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2015.07.004

16.

Griffiths

Hingsburger

Hoath

Ioannou

(2013). “Counterfeit deviance” revisited. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26(5), 471-480. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12034

17.

Hall v. Florida. 134 S. Ct. 1986, 2004 & n.5. (2014). https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2679204/hall-v-florida/

18.

Hall

Jones

(2020). Offenders with autism spectrum disorder: A case of diminished responsibility. In Marinos

Stromski

Whittingham

Griffiths

(Eds.), Intellectual and developmental disabilities and the criminal justice system (pp. 155-174). NADD Press.

19.

Hamelin

Marinos

Robinson

Griffiths

(2012). Human rights and the justice system. In Griffiths

Owen

Watson

S. L.

(Eds.), The human rights agenda for persons with intellectual disabilities (pp. 169-194). NADD Press.

20.

Jones

(2007). Persons with intellectual disabilities in the criminal justice system: Review of issues. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51(6), 723-733. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X07299343

21.

Legal Aid Ontario. (n.d.). Mental health court. http://lawfacts.ca/mental-health/court

22.

Lin

Balogh

Isaacs

Ouellette-Kuntz

Selick

Wilton

A. S.

Cobigo

Lunsky

(2014). Strengths and limitations of health and disability support administrative databases for population-based health research in intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 11(4), 235-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12098

23.

Marinos

Gregory

(2016). The tale of a youth guilty plea court and a youth mental health court in Ontario: How different are they in practice. International Journal of Therapeutic Jurisprudence, 2, 25-59.

24.

Marinos

Griffiths

Fergus

Stromski

Rondeau

(2014). Victims and witnesses with intellectual disability in the criminal justice system. Criminal Law Quarterly, 61, 517-530.

25.

Marinos

Griffiths

Gosse

Robinson

Olley

J. G.

Lindsay

(2008). Legal rights and persons with intellectual disabilities. In Griffiths

Owen

Watson

S. L.

(Eds.), Challenges to the human rights of people with intellectual disabilities (pp. 124-154). NADD Press.

26.

Marinos

Whittingham

(2019). The role of therapeutic jurisprudence to support persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the courtroom: Reflections from Ontario, Canada. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 63(March), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.07.004

27.

Peay

(2015). Mental incapacity and criminal liability: Redrawing the fault lines? International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 40(May), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.04.007

28.

Peltopuro

Ahonen

Kaartinen

Seppälä

Närhi

(2014). Borderline intellectual functioning: A systematic literature review. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 52(6), 419-443. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-52.6.419

29.

Perlin

M. L.

(2017). “God said to Abraham/Kill me a son:” Why the insanity defense and the incompetency status are compatible with and required by the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and basic principles of therapeutic jurisprudence. American Criminal Law Review, 54, 477-519. https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1636&context=fac_articles_chapters

30.

Perlin

M. L.

Gallagher

(2018). “Temptation’s page flies out the door:” Navigating complex systems of disability and the law from therapeutic jurisdiction perspective. Buffalo Human Rights Law Review, 25, 1-36. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3203020

31.

R. v. D.B., 2 S.C.R. 3, 2008 SCC 25. (2008).

32.

R. v. D.S., Ontario Court of Justice (Toronto Region). (2017). Crown’s Response: Constitutional Challenge to s.13. Toronto, ON.

33.

R. v. D.S., Ontario Court of Justice O.J. No. 514. (2018).

34.

Schneider

R. D.

Bloom

Heerema

(2007). Mental health courts: Decriminalizing the mentally ill. Irwin Law.

35.

Series

Nilsson

(2018). Article 12 CRPD: Equal recognition before the law. In Bantekas

Stein

M.A.

Anastasiou

(Eds.), The UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: A commentary. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539188/

36.

Shakespeare

(2013). The social model of disability. In Davis

(Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 214-221). Routledge.

37.

Shoemaker

(2009). Responsibility and disability. Metaphilosophy, 40(3-4), 458-461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01589.x

38.

Simmons

H. G.

(1982). From asylum to welfare. National Institute of Mental Retardation.

39.

The United Nations. (2007). Convention on the rights of persons with developmental disabilities. https://www.refworld.org/docid/45f973632.html

40.

Valenti-Hein

D. C.

Schwartz

L. D.

(1993). Witness competency in people with mental retardation: Implications for prosecution of sexual abuse. Sexuality and Disability, 11(4), 287-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01102173

41.

Wexler

D. B.

(2013). New wine in new bottles: The need to sketch a therapeutic jurisprudence code of proposed criminal processes and practices. Arizona Summit Law Review, 7, 463-478. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2466124

42.

Wexler

D. B.

Winick

B. J.

(1991). Therapeutic jurisprudence as a new approach to mental health law policy analysis and research. University of Miami Law Review, 45(5), 979-1004. https://repository.law.miami.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1948&context=umlr

43.

Wexler

D.B.

Winick

B. J.

(2008). Therapeutic jurisprudence. Principles of Addiction Medicine. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1101507

44.

Whittingham

(2020). Forensic inpatient involvement of persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities. In Marinos

Stromski

Whittingham

Griffiths

(Eds.), Intellectual and developmental disabilities and the criminal justice system (pp. 67-82). NADD Press.

45.

World Health Organization. (2018). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (11th ed.). Author.

46.

Youth Criminal Justice Act, SC 2002, c. 1.