The explosive usage in recent years of the terms “fake news” and “posttruth” reflects worldwide frustration and concern about rampant social problems created by pseudo-information. Our digital networked society and newly emerging media platforms foster public misunderstanding of social affairs, which affects almost all aspects of individual life. The cost of lay citizens’ misunderstandings or crippled lay informatics can be high. Pseudo-information is responsible for deficient social systems and institutional malfunction. We thus ask questions and collect knowledge about the life of pseudo-information and the cognitive and communicative modus operandi of lay publics, as well as how to solve the problem of pseudo-information through understanding the changing media environment in this “truth-be-damned” era of information crisis.
CarterR. F. (1972, September). A general system characteristic of systems in general [Paper presentation]. Far West Region Meeting, Society for General Systems Research, Portland, OR.
DonovanJ.BoydD. (2021). Stop the presses? Moving from strategic silence to strategic amplification in a networked media ecosystem. American Behavioral Scientist, 65, 333-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219878229
Gil de ZúñigaH. (2015). Toward a European public sphere? The promise and perils of modern democracy in the age of digital and social media. International Journal of Communication, 9, 3152-3160. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4783
12.
GrunigJ. E. (2003). Constructing public relations. In DervinB.ChaffeeS. H.Foreman-WernetL. (Eds.), Communication, a different kind of horse race: Essays honoring Richard F. Carter (pp. 85-115). Hampton Press.
GrunigJ. E.KimJ-N. (2017). Publics approaches to health and risk message design and processing. Oxford encyclopedia of health and risk message design and processing. https://doi.10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.322
15.
HaL. H.PerezL. A.RayR. (2021). Mapping recent development in scholarship on fake news and misinformation 2008-2017: Disciplinary contribution, topics and impact. American Behavioral Scientist, 65, 290-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869402
16.
JangS. M.MortensenT.LiuJ. (2021). Does media literacy help identification of fake news? Information literacy helps, but other literacies don’t. American Behavioral Scientist, 65, 371-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869406
17.
KimJ.-N. (2014). Lay consumer informatics and fast-choicism: Instant trust and prompt loyalty in digitalized, networked marketplace. Communication Insight, 3, 10-31. [Written in Korean]
18.
KimJ.-N. (2018). Digital networked information society and public health: Problems and promises of networked health communication of lay publics. Health Communication, 33(1), 1-4, https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1242039
19.
KimJ.-N.GrunigJ. E.NiL. (2010). Reconceptualizing the communicative action of publics: Acquisition, selection, and transmission of information in problematic situations. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 4(2) 126-154.
20.
KimJ.-N.GrunigJ. E. (2011). Problem solving and communicative action: A situational theory of problem solving. Journal of Communication, 61(1), 120-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01529.x
21.
KimJ.-N.GrunigJ. E. (2021). Lost in informational paradise: Cognitive arrest to epistemic inertia in problem solving. American Behavioral Scientist, 65, 213-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219878237
22.
KimJ.-N.KrishnaA. (2014). Publics and lay informatics: A review of the situational theory of problem solving. Annals of the International Communication Association, 38(1), 71-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2014.11679159
23.
KimJ.-N.OhY. W.KrishnaA. (2018). Justificatory information forefending in digital age: Self-sealing informational conviction of risky health behavior, Health Communication, 33(1), 85-93, https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1242040
24.
KrishnaA.ThompsonT. (2021). Misinformation about health: A review of health communication and misinformation scholarship. American Behavioral Scientist, 65, 316-332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219878223
25.
LeeE. J.ShinS. Y. (2019). Mediated misinformation: Questions answered, more questions to ask. American Behavioral Scientist. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869403
26.
LovariA.MartinoV.RighettiN. (2020). Blurred shots: Investigating information crisis around vaccination in Italy. American Behavioral Scientist. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220910245
27.
MarxK. (1867). Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Oekonomie: Der Produktionsprozess des Kapitals (Vol. 1, 1st ed.) [Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume I: The Process of Capitalist Production]. Verlag von Otto Meissner. https://doi.org/10.3931/e-rara-25773
MolinaM.SundarS.LeT.LeeS. (2019). “Fake news” is not simply false information: A concept explication and taxonomy of online content. American Behavioral Scientist. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219878224
31.
OhY. W.ParkC. H. (2019). Machine-cleaning of online opinion spam: Developing a machine-learning algorithm for detecting deceptive comments. American Behavioral Scientist. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219878238
WeeksB.Gil de ZúñigaH. (2019). What’s next? Six observations for the future of political misinformation research. American Behavioral Scientist. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219878236
