Leveraging Connectivities: Comparative Diaspora Strategies and Evolving Cultural Pluralities in China and Singapore

Abstract

Migrant-sending states are connecting systematically with their emigrants and diasporic descendants through policies known as “diaspora strategies.” Underlying diaspora strategizing are the manifold ways in which states capitalize on past migration and present mobility patterns to advance national developmental agendas. Such agendas are conceived in terms of economic and (soft) political power, respectively referred to as “diaspora-and-development” and “diaspora diplomacy.” This article undertakes a comparative analysis of the diaspora strategies by China and Singapore to ask critical questions about, first, the connectivities between migrant-sending states. Doing so elicits the multidirectional migration flows that connect nation-states, showing how the diaspora outreach of one affects the other. Second, the article examines the (multi)cultural logics that underpin diaspora strategizing and its possible impacts on domestic agendas. Such an approach urges researchers to study the race/ethnicity politics that underpin diaspora strategies.

Keywords

diaspora strategies diaspora diplomacy coethnics multiculturalism Singapore China

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amrith

S. S.

(2011). Migration and diaspora in modern Asia, new approaches to Asian history. Cambridge University Press.

Ang

Stratton

(1995). The Singapore way of multiculturalism: Western concepts/Asian cultures. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 10(1), 65-89. https://doi.org/10.1355/SJ10-1E

Anthias

(1998). Evaluating “diaspora”: Beyond ethnicity? Sociology, 32(3), 557-580. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0038038598000091

Barabantseva

(2005). Trans-nationalizing Chineseness: Overseas Chinese policies of the PRC’s central government. Asien, 96(July), 7-28.

Barabasentva

(2012). Who are “overseas chinese ethnic minorities”? China’s search for transnational ethnic unity. Modern China, 38(1), 78-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700411424565

Berkowitz

Mügge

L. M.

(2014). Transnational diaspora lobbying: Europeanization and the Kurdish question. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 35(1), 74-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2013.864625

Blanchard

J. M. F.

(2018). China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative (MSRI) and Southeast Asia: A Chinese “pond” not “lake” in the works. Journal of Contemporary China, 27(111), 329-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1410959

Brinkerhoff

J. M.

(2019). Diasporas and public diplomacy: Distinctions and future prospects. Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14(1-2), 51-64. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-14101015

Boyle

E.L.E.

(2017). Sovereign power, biopower, and the reach of the west in an age of diaspora-centred development. Antipode, 49(3), 577-596. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12281

10.

Callahan

W. A.

(2012). Sino-speak: Chinese exceptionalism and the politics of history. Journal of Asian Studies, 71(1), 33-55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911811002919

11.

Chan

(2016, December 3). How Singapore’s military vehicles became Beijing’s diplomatic weapon. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/2051322/how-singapores-military-vehicles-became-beijings-diplomatic

12.

Collyer

King

(2014). Producing transnational space: International migration and the extra-territorial reach of state power. Progress in Human Geography, 39(2), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514521479

13.

Délano

Gamlen

(2014). Theorizing state-diaspora relations. Political Geography, 41(July), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.05.005

14.

Fitzgerald

(1972). China and the overseas Chinese: A study of Peking’s changing policy, 1949-1970. Cambridge University Press.

15.

Gong

(2019). The Belt and Road Initiative and China’s influence in Southeast Asia. Pacific Review, 32(4), 635-665. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2018.1513950

16.

E.L.E.

(2009) Constituting citizenship through the emotions: Singaporean transmigrants in London. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(4), 788-804. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600903102857

17.

E.L.E.

(2011). “Claiming” the diaspora: sending state strategies, elite mobility and the spatialities of citizenship. Progress in Human Geography 35(6), 757-772.

18.

E.L.E.

, (2019). Citizens in motion: Emigration, immigration and re-migration across China’s borders. Stanford University Press.

19.

E.L.E.

Boyle

(2015). Migration-as-development repackaged? The globalizing imperative of the Singaporean state’s diaspora strategies. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 36(2), 164-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12103

20.

E.L.E.

McConnell

(2019). Conceptualizing “diaspora diplomacy”: Territory and populations betwixt the domestic and foreign. Progress in Human Geography, 43(2), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517740217

21.

W. Y.

(2013). Mobilizing the Muslim minority for China’s development: Hui Muslims, ethnic relations and Sino-Arab connections. Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 12(1), 84-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/15339114.2012.749119

22.

Jiménez-Tovar

(2016). Limits of diaspority in Central Asia: contextualizing Dungan’s multiple belongings. Central Asian Survey, 35(3), 387-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2016.1151626

23.

Kong

(1999). Globalization and Singaporean transmigration: Re-imagining and negotiating national identity. Political Geography, 18(5), 563-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00002-5

24.

Leong

W. K.

(2015). Completed China Cultural Centre to boost arts exchange. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/completed-china-cultural-centre-to-boost-arts-exchange

25.

Liu

(2011). An emerging China and diasporic Chinese: Historicity, state, and international relations. Journal of Contemporary China, 20(72), 813-832. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2011.604502

26.

Liu

(2014). Beyond co-ethnicity: the politics of differentiating and integrating new immigrants in Singapore. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(7), 1225-1238. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2014.892630

27.

Martin

(2017, May 19). New arts center will promote Chinese culture that is Singaporean-centric: PM Lee. Channel NewsAsia. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/new-arts-centre-will-promote-chinese-culture-that-is-singaporean-8864144

28.

McConnell

(2016). Rehearsing the state: The political practices of the Tibetan government-in-exile. Wiley/Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118661192

29.

McGregor

(2009). Associational links with home among Zimbabweans in the UK: Reflections on long-distance nationalisms. Global Networks, 9(2), 185-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00250.x

30.

Mitchell

(1993). Multiculturalism, or the united colors of capitalism? Antipode, 25(4), 263-294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.1993.tb00220.x

31.

Myambo

M. T.

(2017). Frontier heritage migration in the global ethnic economy. Public Culture, 29(2), 261-285. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-3749057

32.

Newland

(2010). Voice after exit: Diaspora advocacy. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/voice-after-exit-diaspora-advocacy

33.

Ngeow

C. B.

(2016). More Islamic, no less Chinese: Explorations into overseas Chinese Muslim identities in Malaysia. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(12), 2108-2128. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2016.1199889

34.

Oakes

(1999). Bathing in the Far Village: Globalization, transnational capital, and the cultural politics of modernity in China. Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique, 7(2), 307-342. https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-7-2-307

35.

Oakes

(2013). Heritage as improvement cultural display and contested governance in rural China. Modern China, 39(4), 380-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700412467011

36.

Pellerin

Mullings

(2013). The “diaspora option”, migration and the changing political economy of development. Review of International Political Economy, 20(1), 89–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2011.649294

37.

Ragazzi

(2009). Governing diasporas. International Political Sociology, 3(4), 378-397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2009.00082.x

38.

Robinson

(2016). Thinking cities through elsewhere: Comparative tactics for a more global urban studies. Progress in Human Geography, 40(1), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515598025

39.

Rogers

Wong

Nelson

(2017). Public perceptions of foreign and Chinese real estate investment: Intercultural relations in Global Sydney. Australian Geographer, 48(4), 437-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2017.1317050

40.

Shain

(2002). The role of diasporas in conflict perpetuation or resolution. SAIS Review, 22(2), 115-144. https://doi.org/10.1353/sais.2002.0052

41.

Sim

(2019, July 18). Report flags how China conducts influence operations in Singapore. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/report-flags-how-china-conducts-influence-operations-in-spore

42.

Sinatti

Horst

(2015). Migrants as agents of development: Diaspora engagement discourse and practice in Europe. Ethnicities, 15(1), 134-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796814530120

43.

The Straits Times. (2016, October 1). China should make Singapore pay over South China Sea dispute, says PLA adviser. https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/china-should-make-singapore-pay-over-south-china-sea-dispute-says-pla-defence-adviser

44.

(2012). Beijing’s policies for managing Han and ethnic-minority Chinese communities abroad. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 41(4), 183-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810261204100407

45.

Tsuda

(Ed.). (2009). Diasporic homecomings: ethnic return migration in comparative perspective. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804772068

46.

Varadarajan

(2010). The domestic abroad: Diasporas in international relations. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199733910.001.0001

47.

Vasantkumar

(2014). Unmade in China: Reassembling the ethnic on the Gansu–Tibetan border. Ethnos, 79(2), 261-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2012.753926

48.

Wilson

(2019). At once the saviors and the saved: “Diaspora girls”, dangerous places, and smart power. Antipode, 51(5), 1664-1683. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12568

49.

Yamashiro

J. H.

(2015). Working towards conceptual consistency in discussing “diaspora” and “diaspora strategies”: Ethnicity and affinity in the case of Japan. Geoforum, 59(February), 178-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.11.009

50.

Zweig

(2006). Competing for talent: China’s strategies to reverse the brain drain. International Labor Review, 145(1-2), 65-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2006.tb00010.x