In recent decades, many countries ranging from quasidemocratic regimes to well-established democracies have faced democratic backsliding. In this study, we draw on Foa and Mounk and other related literature to examine the effects of regime delegitimation on democratic backsliding, focusing on youth’s trust in political institutions—parliament, legal systems, and political parties—relative to trust of the older population. We use an unbalanced panel data set that combines a country-year indicator of liberal democracy from the Varieties of Democracy project with aggregate survey-based measures of absolute and relative institutional trust from the Survey Data Recycling database; the data set covers 46 countries from 2009 to 2017. We find that the ratio of youth’s institutional trust to that of older persons has a substantive effect on the quality of liberal democracy in the future, and that the effect is amplified by the relative size of the youth population.
AghA. (2015). De‑Europeanization and de‑democratization trends in ECE: From the Potemkin democracy to the elected autocracy in Hungary. Journal of Comparative Politics, 8(2), 4-26.
2.
AghA. (2016). The deconsolidation of democracy in East-Central Europe: The new world order and the EU’s geopolitical crisis. Politics in Central Europe, 12(3), 7-36. https://doi.org/10.1515/pce-2016-0015
3.
AlexanderA. C.WelzelC. (2017). The myth of deconsolidation: Rising liberalism and the populist reaction (No. 10). ILE Working Paper Series.
BértoaF. C.WeberT. (2019). Restrained change: Party systems in times of economic crisis. Journal of Politics, 81(1), 233-245. https://doi.org/10.1086/700202
6.
BogaardsM. (2009). How to classify hybrid regimes? Defective democracy and electoral authoritarianism. Democratization, 16(2), 399-423. https://doi.org/10.1086/700202
7.
CianettiL.DawsonL. J.HanleyS. (2018). Rethinking “democratic backsliding” in Central and Eastern Europe: Looking beyond Hungary and Poland. East European Politics, 34(3), 243-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1491401
8.
ClaassenC. (2019). Does public support help democracy survive?American Journal of Political Science, 64(1), 118-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12452
DalyT. G. (2017). Democratic decay in 2016. Annual Review of Constitution-Building Processes, 2016, 7-23.
11.
DalyT. G. (2019). Democratic decay: Conceptualising an emerging research field. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 11(1), 9-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-019-00086-2
DiamondL. (2008). The democratic rollback-the resurgence of the predatory state. Foreign Affairs, 87(2), 36-48.
14.
FoaR. S.MounkY. (2016). The danger of deconsolidation: The democratic disconnect. Journal of Democracy, 27(3), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0049
Garcia-AlbaceteG. M. (2014). Young people’s political participation in Western Europe: continuity or generational change?Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137341310
17.
HsiaoC. (2003). Analysis of panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
18.
HuntingtonS. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. University of Oklahoma Press.
19.
HuqA. Z. (2018). Democratic erosion and the courts: Comparative perspectives. New York University Law Review, 93, 21-37.
InglehartR. F. (2016). The danger of deconsolidation: how much should we worry?Journal of Democracy, 27(3), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0053
22.
KołczyńskaM.SchoeneM. (2018). Survey data harmonization and the quality of data documentation in cross-national surveys. In JohnsonT. P.PennellB.-E.StoopI. A. L.DorerB. (Eds.), .Advances in comparative survey methods: Multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts (3MC) (pp. 963-984). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118884997.ch44
23.
KołczyńskaM.SlomczynskiK. M. (2018). Item metadata as controls for ex post harmonization of international survey projects. In JohnsonT. P.PennellB.-E.StoopI. A. L.DorerB. (Eds.), Advances in comparative survey methods: Multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts (3MC) (pp. 1011-1033). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118884997.ch46
24.
KwakJ.SlomczynskiK. M. (2019). Aggregating survey data on the national level for indexing trust in public institutions: On the effects of lagged variables, data-harmonization controls and data quality. Harmonization: Newsletter on Survey Data Harmonization in the Social Sciences, 5(1), 5-14. www.asc.ohio-state.edu/dataharmonization/newsletter/
25.
LawD. S. (2017). Alternatives to liberal constitutional democracy (University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2018/004). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3087244
LuedersH.LustE. (2018). Multiple measurements, elusive agreement, and unstable outcomes in the study of regime change. Journal of Politics, 80(2), 736-741. https://doi.org/10.1086/696864
28.
LührmannA.GastaldiL.GrahnS.LindbergS. I.MaxwellL.MechkovaV.MorganR.StepanovaN.PillaiS. (2019). Democracy facing global challenges: V-Dem Annual Democracy Report. University of Gothenberg.
29.
LührmannA.MechkovaV.DahlumS.MaxwellL.OlinM.PetrarcaC. S.SigmanR.WilsonM. C.LindbergS. I. (2018). State of the world 2017: Autocratization and exclusion?Democratization, 25(2), 1321-1340.
30.
LührmannA.MechkovaV.LindbergS. (2018). State of the world: Liberal and electoral democracy. In LührmannA.LindbergS. (Eds.), Democracy for all? V-Dem annual democracy report (pp. 16-30). University of Gothenberg.
31.
MannheimK. (1952). The problem of generations. In Essays on the Sociology of KnowledgeRoutledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1928)
32.
MechkovaV.LührmannA.LindbergS. I. (2017). How much democratic backsliding?Journal of Democracy, 28(4), 162-169. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0075
33.
MounkY. (2018). The people vs. democracy: Why our freedom is in danger and how to save it. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674984776
O’DonnellG. (1996). Democratic deconsolidation: Illusions and conceptual flaws. Journal of Democracy, 7(4), 160-167. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1996.0072
36.
OleksiyenkoO.WysmulekI.VangeliA. (2018). Identification of processing errors in cross-national surveys. In JohnsonT. P.PennellB.-E.StoopI. A. L.DorerB. (Eds.), Advances in comparative survey methods: Multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts (3MC) (pp. 985-1010). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118884997.ch45
37.
PrzeworskiA. (1991). Democracy and the market: Political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139172493
38.
RuckD.MatthewsL. J.KyritsisT.AtkinsonQ. D.BentleyR. A. (2020). The cultural foundations of modern democracies. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 265-269https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0769-1
SchedlerA. (2001). Measuring democratic consolidation. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(1), 66-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687585
41.
ScheppeleK. L. (2018). Autocratic legalism. University of Chicago Law Review, 85, 545-555.
42.
SlomczynskiK. M.JanickaK. (2009). Structural determinants of trust in public institutions: Cross-national differentiation. International Journal of Sociology, 39(1), 8-29. https://doi.org/10.2753/IJS0020-7659390101
SlomczynskiK. M.Tomescu-DubrowI. (2018). Basic principles of survey data recycling. In JohnsonT. P.PennellB.-E.StoopI. A. L.DorerB. (Eds.), Advances in comparative survey methodology: Multinational, multiregional and multicultural contexts (3MC) (pp. 937-962). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118884997.ch43
45.
SlomczynskiK. M.Tomesu-DubrowI.JenkinsJ. C.KołczyńskaM.PowałkoP.WysmułekI.OleksiyenkoO.ZielińskiM. W.DubrowJ. (2016). Democratic values and protest behavior: Harmonization of data from international survey projects. IFiS PAN.
46.
SnijdersT.BoskerR. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). Sage.
47.
SvolikM. (2008). Authoritarian reversals and democratic consolidation. American Political Science Review, 102(2), 153-168. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055408080143
WeissJ. (2020). What is youth political participation? Literature review on youth political participation and political attitudes. Frontiers in Political Science, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2020.00001
51.
WlezienC. (1995). The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 981-1000. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111666
52.
ZilinskyJ. (2019). Democratic deconsolidation revisited: Young Europeans are not dissatisfied with democracy. Research and Politics, 6(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018814332
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
