This article offers Foucauldian discourse analysis (FDA) as an innovative qualitative methodology to apply to the intersection of social media and public policy research. The article has two sections. The first section briefly defines FDA and discourse and situates the methodology in the educational policy research literature. The second section applies FDA to a narrative about the Common Core State Standards as it occurred on Twitter, with an explanation of key terms throughout the process.
AllcottH.GentzkowM. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31, 211-236.
2.
Arribas-AllyonM.WalkerdineV. (2008). Foucauldian discourse analysis. In WilligC.RogersW. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 91-108). London, England: Sage.
3.
BallS. J. (2005). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London, England: Routledge.
4.
BallS. J. (2015). What is policy? 21 Years later: Reflections on the possibilities of policy research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36, 306-313.
5.
BaumeisterR. F.NewmanL. S. (1994). How stories make sense of personal experiences: Motives that shape autobiographical narratives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 676-690.
BourkeT.LidstoneJ. (2015). What is Plan B? Using Foucault’s archaeology to enhance policy analysis. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36, 833-853.
8.
BovéP. A. (1995). Discourse. In LentricchiaF.McLaughlinT. (Eds.), Critical terms for literary study (2nd ed., pp. 50-65). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
BurmanE.GreensteinA.BraggJ.HanleyT.KalamboukaA.LuptonR.. . . WinterL. (2017). Subjects of, or subject to, policy reform? A Foucauldian discourse analysis of regulation and resistance in UK narratives of educational impacts of welfare cuts: The case of the “bedroom tax.”Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25, 2320. doi:10.14507/epaa.25.2320
Diaz-BoneR.BührmannA. D.RodríguezE. G.SchneiderW.KendallG.TiradoF. (2008). The field of Foucauldian discourse analysis: Structures, developments and perspectives. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 8(2), 7-28.
12.
DreyfusH. L.RabinowP. (1982). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. London, England: Routledge.
13.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (A. M.Sheridan Smith, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon.
14.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York, NY: Pantheon.
15.
FoucaultM. (1997). The Ethics of the Concern of the Self as a Practice of Freedom. In RabinowP. (Ed.) Michel Foucault: Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth, the Essential Works (pp. 281–301). New York: New Press.
16.
FowlerF. C. (2000). Policy studies for educational leaders. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
17.
GarrityZ. (2010). Discourse analysis, Foucault and social work research. Journal of Social Work, 10, 193-210.
18.
GeeJ. P. (2005). An introduction to critical discourse analysis. Theory and method (2nd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
19.
GrahamL. J. (2011). The product of text and “other” statements: Discourse analysis and the critical use of Foucault. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43, 663-674.
20.
GrahamL. (2005). Discourse analysis & the critical use of Foucault. Australian Association for Research in Education, 34(12), 1-14.
21.
HajerM. (2006) Doing discourse analysis: Coalitions, practices, meaning. In van den BrinkM.MetzeT. (Eds.) Words matter in policy and planning: Discourse theory and method in the social sciences (pp. 65-74). Utrecht, ND: KNAG/Nethur.
22.
HewittS. (2009). Discourse analysis and public policy research. Centre for Rural Economy Discussion Paper Series, 24, 1-16.
23.
HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. (2005). Interpretative Practice and Social Action. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed., pp. 483-505). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
24.
HopeA. (2015). Schoolchildren, governmentality and national e-safety policy discourse. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36, 343-353. doi:10.1080/01596306.2013.871237
25.
JacobsK. (2006). Discourse analysis and its utility for urban policy research. Urban Policy and Research, 24, 39-52.
26.
JansenB. J.ZhangM.SobelK.ChowduryA. (2009). Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 2169-2188.
27.
JonesM. D.McBethM. K. (2010). A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong?. Policy Studies Journal, 38, 329-353.
28.
KendallG.WickhamG. (1999). Using Foucault’s methods. London, England: Sage.
29.
KirbyA. (2006). The death of postmodernism and beyond. Philosophy Now, 58, 34-37.
30.
KirbyA. (2009). Digimodernism: How new technologies dismantle the postmodern and reconfigure our culture. New York, NY: Continuum.
31.
LeGrecoM. (2017). Discourse Analysis. In MillsJ.BirksM. (Eds.), Qualitative methodology: A practical guide (pp. 67-88). London: Sage.
32.
LesterJ. N.LochmillerC. R.GabrielR. (2017). Exploring the intersection of education policy and discourse analysis: An introduction. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25, 2971. doi:10.14507/epaa.25.2971
33.
LesterJ. N.WhiteF. A.LochmillerC. R. (2017). Language-based approaches to the study of education policy. In LesterJ. N.LochmillerC. R.GabrielR. E. (Eds.), Discursive perspectives on education policy and implementation (pp. 41-64). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
LyotardJ. F. (1979). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
35.
ManathungaC. (2018). Excavating cultural imperialism in student mobility programmes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39, 564-574.
36.
MayoC. (2000). The uses of Foucault. Educational Theory, 50, 103-116.
37.
McDonnellL. M.WeatherfordM. S. (2013). Organized interests and the Common Core. Educational Researcher, 42, 488-497.
38.
McKeeK. (2009). Post-Foucauldian governmentality: What does it offer critical social policy analysis?Critical Social Policy, 29, 465-486. doi:10.1177/0261018309105180
39.
McKennaB.MyersM. D.NewmanM. (2017). Social media in qualitative research: Challenges and recommendations. Information and Organization, 27, 87-99.
McLuhanM. (1964). Understanding Media. New York: McGrew Hill.
42.
PattonP. (1979). Of power and prisons. In MorrisM.PattonP. (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Power, truth, strategy (pp. 109–47). Sydney: Feral Publications.
43.
ParkerI. (1989). Discourse and power. In ShotterJ.GergenK. J. (Eds.), Texts of identity (Inquiries in social construction series, Vol. 2, pp. 56-69). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44.
PetersM. A. (2004). Educational research: “Games of truth” and the ethics of subjectivity. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 5(2), 50-63.
45.
PopkewitzT. S.BrennanM. T. (1998). Foucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
46.
PullmanJ. (2017). Education invasion: How common core fights parents for control of American kids. New York, NY: Encounter Books.
47.
RazackS.LessardD.HodgesB. D.MaguireM. H.SteinertY. (2014). The more it changes; the more it remains the same: A Foucauldian analysis of Canadian policy documents relevant to student selection for medical school. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 19, 161-181.
48.
RowanM.ShoreS. (2009). Foucault’s toolkit: Resources for’thinking’work in times of continual change. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 49, 57.
49.
SabatierP. A.WeibleC. M. (Eds.). (2014). Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
50.
ScheurichJ.McKenzieK. (2005). Foucault’s methodologies: Archealogy and genealogy. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 841-869). London, England: Sage.
51.
ShinerL. (1982). Reading Foucault: Anti-method and the genealogy of power-knowledge. History and Theory, 21, 382-398.
52.
SpohrerK. (2016). Negotiating and contesting “success”: Discourses of aspiration in a UK secondary school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37, 411-425.
53.
St. PierreE. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of qualitative inquiry (4th ed., pp. 611-635). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
54.
St. PierreE. A. (2014). A brief and personal history of post qualitative research: Toward “post inquiry.”Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 2-19.
SupovitzJ.ReinkordtE. (2017). Keep Your Eye on the Metaphor: The Framing of the Common Core on Twitter. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25, 30.
57.
TracyK.MirivelJ. C. (2009). Discourse analysis: The practice and practical value of taping, transcribing, and analyzing talk. In FreyL. R.CissnaK. N. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of applied communication research (pp. 153-178). London, England: Routledge.
