Drawing on intersectionality theory, I examine how U.S. visa policies shape the informal self-employment experiences of Indian women and men who migrated to the United States on “dependent visas” to accompany their highly skilled spouses on temporary work visas. Dependent visa policy prohibits employment for the visa holders for a period that can last from 6 to 20 years. Despite this, only a handful of those on dependent visas pursued informal self-employment in my sample, with fewer men than women. This study is based on interviews with 45 participants, with a special focus on 18 dependent spouses (men and women), who had engaged in active self-employment, and tries to understand their experiences with self-employment, particularly their choice of businesses and the role of self-employment in their lives as dependents. I conclude that the complexities of the experiences of self-employment for my research participants are embedded in the intersections of their gender, class, race, and immigration status. Additionally, self-employment itself inadvertently becomes an act of subversion against their state-imposed dependence.
AndersonB. (2010). Migration, immigration controls and the fashioning of precarious workers. Work, Employment and Society, 24, 300-317.
2.
AnthiasF. (2002). Where do I belong? Narrating collective identity and translocational positionality. Ethnicities, 2(4), 491-514.
3.
AnthiasF. (2008). Thinking through the lens of translocational positionality: an intersectionality frame for understanding identity and belonging. Translocations: Migration and social change, 4(1), 5-20.
4.
AnthiasF. (2012). Transnational mobilities, migration research and intersectionality. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 2, 102-110.
5.
BanerjeeP. (2006). Indian information technology workers in the United States: The H-1B visa, flexible production, and the racialization of labor. Critical Sociology, 32(2-3), 425-445.
6.
BanerjeeP. (2012). Constructing dependence: Visa regimes and gendered migration in families of Indian professional workers (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10027/9771
7.
BanerjeeP. (2013). Paradoxes of patriarchy: Contradicting experiences of South Asian women in ethnic labor markets. In Flores-GonzálezN.GuevarraA. R.Toro-MornM.ChangG. (Eds.), Immigrant women workers in the neoliberal age (pp. 96-116). Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
8.
BilgeS. (2010). Recent feminist outlooks on intersectionality. Diogenes, 57, 58-72.
9.
BrickellC. (2005). Masculinities, performativity, and subversion: A sociological reappraisal. Men and Masculinities, 8, 24-43.
10.
BudigM. J. (2006). Gender, self-employment, and earnings: The interlocking structures of family and professional status. Gender & Society, 20, 725-753.
11.
ButlerJ. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
CastellsM.PortesA. (1989). World underneath: The origins, dynamics, and effects of the informal economy. The informal economy: Studies in advanced and less developed countries, 12.
13.
CollinsP. H. (2002). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
CollinsP. H. (2010). The new politics of community. American Sociological Review, 75, 7-30.
15.
CollinsP. H.BilgeS. (2016). Intersectionality. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
16.
DallafarA. (1994). Iranian women as immigrant entrepreneurs. Gender & Society, 8, 541-561.
17.
EssersC.BenschopY. (2009). Muslim businesswomen doing boundary work: The negotiation of Islam, gender and ethnicity within entrepreneurial contexts. Human Relations, 62, 403-423.
18.
EstradaE. (2016). Economic empathy in family entrepreneurship: Mexican-origin street vendor children and their parents. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(9), 1657-1675.
19.
GlennE. N. (2002). Unequal freedom: How race and gender shaped American freedom and labor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
HardyK.SandersT. (2015). The political economy of “lap dancing”: Contested careers and women’s work in the stripping industry. Work, Employment and Society, 29, 119-136.
21.
HarveyA. M. (2005). Becoming entrepreneurs: Intersections of race, class, and gender at the black beauty salon. Gender & Society, 19, 789-808.
22.
KnightM. (2016). Race-ing, classing and gendering racialized women’s participation in entrepreneurship. Gender, Work & Organization, 23(3), 310-327.
23.
ManoharN. N. (2008). Gender and ethnicity in union formation: The case of second-generation Patels. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 34(2), 209-234.
24.
MenjívarC., 2006. Liminal legality: Salvadoran and Guatemalan immigrants’ lives in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 111(4), 999-1037.
25.
MenjívarC.AbregoL. (2012). Legal violence: Immigration law and the lives of Central American immigrants. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 1380-1421.
26.
MuñozL. (2013). From street child care to drive-throughs: Latinas reconfigure and negotiate street vending spaces in Los Angeles. In Flores-GonzalezN.GuevarraA. R.Toro-MornM.ChangG. (Eds.), Immigrant women workers in the neoliberal age (pp. 133-143). Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
27.
ParkerS. C. (2004). The economics of self-employment and entrepreneurship. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28.
PortesA.GuarnizoL. E.HallerW. J. (2002). Transnational entrepreneurs: An alternative form of immigrant economic adaptation. American Sociological Review, 67, 278-298.
29.
RaijmanR. (2001). Mexican immigrants and informal self-employment in Chicago. Human Organization, 60, 47-55.
RomeroM.ValdezZ. (2016). Introduction to the special issue: Intersectionality and entrepreneurship. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39, 1553-1565.
32.
SandersJ. M.NeeV. (1996). Immigrant self-employment: The family as social capital and the value of human capital. American Sociological Review, 61, 231-249.
33.
ValdezZ. (2008). The effect of social capital on White, Korean, Mexican and Black business owners’ earnings in the US. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34, 955-973.
34.
ValdezZ. (2011). The new entrepreneurs: How race, class, and gender shape American entreprise. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
35.
ValdezZ. (2016). Intersectionality, the household economy, and ethnic entrepreneurship. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39, 1618-1636.
36.
ValenzuelaA.Jr. (2001). Day labourers as entrepreneurs?Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 27, 335-352.
37.
WaldingerR. D.AldrichH.WardR. (1990). Ethnic entrepreneurs: Immigrant business in industrial societies (Vol. 1). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
