Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Despite societal dependence on digital technologies and the Internet across the developed world, current prisoner rehabilitation, reentry models, and practices across most U.S. state correctional systems only target offline realms and issues while disregarding the digital realm. By integrating existing models of rehabilitation and reentry with recently developed and refined digital divide theories, this article develops a new model of digital rehabilitation, considering both the online and the offline realms. The proposed model fills a gap in the literature and allows for a more complete understanding of the problems that parolees encounter on release from prison. By conceptualizing corresponding fields and resources across three realms—prison, reentry, and digital—the digital rehabilitation and reentry model enables systematic research into the extent to which the digital realm can assist in a more successful reentry process.

Keywords

digital divide digital inequality prisoner rehabilitation reentry parolees

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aday

R. H.

(2003). Aging prisoners: Crisis in American corrections. Westport, CT: Praeger.

AnyTrax. (2013). Retrieved from http://offender-management.com/electronic-monitoring/voice-verification

Blank

Groselj

(2014). Dimensions of Internet use: Amount, variety, and types. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 417-435. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.889189

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2015). Key statistic: Total correctional population. Retrieved from https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=kfdetail&iid=487

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). Employment by major industry sector. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_201.htm

California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation. (2017). Computer Literacy Learning Center (CLLC). Retrieved from http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/rehabilitation/CLLC.html

Chatman

E. A.

(1999). A theory of life in the round. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 207-217.

Clear

T. R.

(2009). Imprisoning communities: How mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Oxford University Press.

Cotten

S. R.

Ford

Hale

T. M.

(2014). Internet use and depression among retired older adults in the United States: A longitudinal analysis. Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 69(5), 763-771. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbu018

10.

DiMaggio

Hargittai

(2001). From the “digital divide” to “digital inequality”: Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Princeton, NJ: Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies.

11.

Drake

(2013). Inventory of evidence-based and research-based programs for adult corrections. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

12.

Durose

M. R.

Cooper

A. D.

Snyder

H. N.

(2014). Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010 (NCJ 244205). Retrieved from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rprts05p0510.pdf

13.

Fox

K. J.

(2014). Theorizing community integration as desistance-promotion. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 82-94. doi:10.1177/0093854814550028

14.

Garland

(2001). The culture of control (Vol. 367). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

15.

Garland

(2012). Punishment and modern society: A study in social theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

16.

Grieb

S. M. D.

Crawford

Fields

Smith

Harris

Matson

(2014). “The stress will kill you”: Prisoner reentry as experienced by family members and the urgent need for support services. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 25, 1183-1200.

17.

Haney

(2003). The psychological impact of incarceration: Implications for post-prison adjustment. Paper presented at the “From Prison to Home” conference. http://webarchive.urban.org/UploadedPDF/410624_PyschologicalImpact.pdf

18.

Helsper

E. J.

(2012). A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion. Communication Theory, 22, 403-426. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x

19.

Helsper

E. J.

(2017). The social relativity of digital exclusion: Applying relative deprivation theory to digital inequalities. Communication Theory, 27, 223-242. doi:10.1111/comt.12110

20.

Hinton

(2016). From the war on poverty to the war on crime. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

21.

Irwin

(2005). The warehouse prison: Disposal of the new dangerous class. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.

22.

Jonson

C. L.

Cullen

F. T.

(2015). Prisoner reentry programs. Crime and Justice, 44, 517-575. doi:10.1086/681554

23.

JPay. (2017). JP5 tablets. Retrieved from http://offers.jpay.com/jp5-tablets/

24.

Kravets

(2011). U.N. report declares Internet access a human right. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2011/06/internet-a-human-right/

25.

Kreager

D. A.

Young

J. T. N.

Haynie

D. L.

Bouchard

Schaefer

D. R.

Zajac

(2017). Where “old heads” prevail: Inmate hierarchy in a men’s prison unit. American Sociological Review, 82, 685-718. doi:10.1177/0003122417710462

26.

Krogstad

J. M.

Passel

J. S.

Cohn

D. V.

(2017). 5 facts about illegal immigration in the U.S. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/11/19/5-facts-about-illegal-immigration-in-the-u-s/

27.

LeBel

T. P.

Richie

Maruna

(2014). Helping others as a response to reconcile a criminal past. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 108-120. doi:10.1177/0093854814550029

28.

LinkNYC. (2017). LinkNYC. Retrieved from https://www.link.nyc

29.

Lipton

Martinson

Wilks

(1975). The effectiveness of correctional treatment: A survey of treatment evaluation studies. New York, NY: Praeger.

30.

Livingstone

Helsper

(2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9, 671-696. doi:10.1177/1461444807080335

31.

Lowenkamp

C. T.

Latessa

E. J.

(2005). Developing successful reentry programs: Lessons learned from the “what works” research. Corrections Today, 67, 72-77.

32.

Martinson

(1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. Public Interest, 35, 22-54.

33.

Mears

D. P.

(2012). Prison experience. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 345-347.

34.

Petersilia

(2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

35.

Pew Research Center. (2017). Internet/broadband fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/

36.

Phelps

M. S.

(2011). Rehabilitation in the punitive era: The gap between rhetoric and reality in U.S. prison programs. Law & Society Review, 45, 33-68. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00427.x

37.

Phillips

(2012). The multicultural prison: Ethnicity, masculinity, and social relations among prisoners. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

38.

Prensky

(2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the horizon, 9(5), 1-6.

39.

Reisdorf

B. C.

Groselj

(2017). Internet (non-)use types and motivational access: Implications for digital inequalities research. New Media & Society, 19, 1157-1176. doi:10.1177/1461444815621539

40.

Reisdorf

B. C.

Jewkes

(2016). (B)Locked sites: Cases of Internet use in three British prisons. Information, Communication & Society, 19, 771-786. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1153124

41.

Rikard

R. V.

Rosenberg

(2007). Aging inmates: A convergence of trends in the American criminal justice system. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 13, 150-162.

42.

Risen

(2015, July 16). Bridging the digital divide. U.S. News. Retrieved from https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/07/16/obamas-connecthome-aims-to-bridge-digital-divide

43.

Robinson

Cotten

S. R.

Ono

Quan-Haase

Mesch

Chen

. . . Stern

M. J.

(2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 569-582. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532

44.

Sabo

D. F.

Kupers

T. A.

London

W. J.

(2001). Prison masculinities. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

45.

Stevens

(2012). “I am the person now I was always meant to be”: Identity reconstruction and narrative reframing in therapeutic community prisons. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 12, 527-547. doi:10.1177/1748895811432958

46.

Travis

(2005). But they all come back: Facing the challenges of prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

47.

Tsai

H.-y. S.

Shillair

Cotten

S. R.

(2017). Social support and “playing around” an examination of how older adults acquire digital literacy with tablet computers. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 36, 29-55.

48.

van Deursen

A. J. A. M.

van Dijk

J. A. G. M

. (2013). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16, 507-526. doi:10.1177/1461444813487959

49.

van Dijk

J. A. G. M

. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

50.

Visher

C. A.

(2006). Effective reentry programs. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 299-302.

51.

Visher

C. A.

Lattimore

P. K.

Barrick

Tueller

(2017). Evaluating the long-term effects of prisoner reentry services on recidivism: What types of services matter? Justice Quarterly, 34, 136-165. doi:10.1080/07418825.2015.1115539

52.

Visher

C. A.

Travis

(2003). Transitions from prison to community: Understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 89-113.

53.

Warschauer

(2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge: MIT press.

54.

Western

(2006). Punishment and inequality in America. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

55.

Wing

(2015). Here are all of the nations that incarcerate more of their population than the U.S. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/13/incarceration-rate-per-capita_n_3745291.html

56.

Wolfgang

(2015, July 14). Obama calls for overhaul of prison system, end of mandatory minimum sentences. Washington Times. Retrieved from http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/14/obama-calls-for-overhaul-of-prison-system-end-of-m/

57.

Wright

A. D.

(2015, July 1). Demand for those with digital skills increasing: Digital fluency can be encouraged through training and education. Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/technology/pages/demand-for-those-with-digital-skills-increasing.aspx

58.

Zillien

Hargittai

(2009). Digital distinction: Status-specific types of Internet usage*. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 274-291. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00617.x

Digital Rehabilitation: A Model of Reentry Into the Digital Age

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References