This article studies the argumentative content of online comments posted in response to the Pollshare.com survey, “How satisfied are you with Trump as President?” Positioned within the body of research exploring the public sphere, this quantitative and qualitative content analysis identifies trends in word use, prominent phrases, and argumentative strategies used. A lack of civility and promotion of self-interest are evident in the three main categories of responses (i.e., satisfied, dissatisfied, and neutral). However, there is evidence of sound argument as well, particularly in the form of argument by comparison, found to be the most prominent argument type among those satisfied and dissatisfied. Directional arguments and argument of sacrifice and waste were identified as well.
ArthosJ. (2003). Where there are no rules or systems to guide us: Argument from example in a hermeneutic rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 89, 320-344. doi:10:80/0033563032000160972
3.
BakerP. (2017, January24). Upending trade policies, trump scraps Asia pact. New York Times, A1.
4.
BarberB. B. (2003). Which technology and which democracy? In JenkinsH.ThorburnD. (Eds.), Democracy and the new media (pp. 33-47). Cambridge: MIT Press.
5.
BarretD.FroschD. (2017, February4). Federal judge temporarily halts trump order on immigration, refugees. Wall Street Journal, p. A1.
6.
BatorskiD.GrzywinskaI. (2018). Three dimensions of public sphere on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 21, 356-374. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1281329
7.
ChenG. M.LuS. (2017). Online political discourse: Exploring differences in effects of civil and uncivil disagreements in news website comments. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61, 108-125. doi:10.1080/0883815132016.1273922
8.
CollinsL.NerlichB. (2015). Examining user comments for deliberative democracy: A corpus-driven analysis of the climate change debate online. Environmental Communication, 9, 189-207. doi:10.1080/17524032.2014.981560
DahlbergL. (2001). The Internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 4, 615-633. doi:10.1080/13691180110097030
11.
DahlgrenP. (2005). The internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22, 147-162. doi:10.1080/10584600590933160
12.
HabermasJ. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (BurgerT. Trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press. (Original work published 1962)
13.
HabermasJ. (2005). Concluding comments on empirical approaches to deliberative politics. Acta Politica, 40, 384-392. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500119
14.
HalpernD.ValenzuelaS.KatzJ. (2017). We face, I tweet: How different social media influence political participation through collective and internal efficacy. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22, 320-336. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12198
JaskinskiJ. (2001). Argument. In Sourcebook on rhetoric: Key concepts in contemporary rhetorical studies (pp. 24-55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
JasinskiJ. (2001). Public sphere. In Sourcebook on rhetoric: Key concepts in contemporary rhetorical studies (pp. 473-477). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
KarlsenR.Steen-JohnsenK.WollebaekD.EnjolrasB. (2017). Echo chamber and trench warfare dynamics in online debates. European Journal of Communication, 32, 257-273. doi:10.1080/10584600590933160
19.
McCormickS. (2014). Argument by comparison: An ancient typology. Rhetorica, 35, 148-164. doi:10.1525/rh.2014.32.2.148
20.
OgdenC. K.RichardsA. (2001). The meaning of meaning: A study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace. (Original work published 1923)
21.
PerelmanC.Olbrechts-TytecaL. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (WilkinsonJ.WeaverP. Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published 1958)
ProtessB.DavisJ. H. (2017, February3). Trump moves to roll back Obama-Era financial regulations. New York Times, p. A1.
24.
RasmussenT. (2009). The significance of Internet communication in public deliberation. Javnost-Ljubljana, 16, 17-32. doi:10.1080/13183222.2009.11008995
25.
RasmussenT. (2014). Internet and the political public sphere. Sociology Compass, 8, 1315-1329. doi:10.1111/soc4.12228
26.
SchwartzF. (2017, January23). Trump reinstates antiabortion policy for overseas groups. Wall Street Journal, p. A6.
