Occupational socialization, when successful, permits an orderly transition from novice to professional, but sometimes the process is uncertain. Successful socialization is evident when workers are trained within educational settings where a path to future positions is clear. But how do emerging visual artists consider their post-degree lives in the absence of predictability or expected stages of advancement? In unpredictable careers, socialization becomes problematic. This hazy career path is further strained when people have diverse views about the moral character of a profession. Based on a 2-year ethnographic study of three MFA programs in the Chicago area, I examine how visual arts students imagine their futures. Students face an obdurate economic order that forces them to consider their identities as producers of ideas and images. Beyond this, to create a stable career and survive financially, they strive to establish a network, relying on school ties with students and faculty, building social capital, including links with galleries and museums. By depicting occupational imaginaries at the intersection of market valuation and aesthetic judgment, I analyze how students negotiate the demands of hostile worlds in their artistic identity and through their social relations.
AbbingH. (2002). Why are artists poor? The exceptional economy of the arts. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
2.
AbreuM.FaggianA.ComunianR.McCannP. (2012). “Life is short, art is long”: The persistent wage gap between Bohemian and non-Bohemian graduates. Annals of Regional Science, 49, 305-321.
3.
AdlerJ. (1979). Artists in offices. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
4.
Anonymous. (2008). A note to the reader from the young artist. In NesbettP.AndressS. (Eds.), Letters to a young artist (pp. 9-10). New York, NY: Darte.
5.
AnthonyA.JoshiA. (in press). (In)Authenticity work: Constructing the realm of inauthenticity through Thomas Kinkade. Journal of Consumer Culture.
6.
BaxandallM. (1973). Painting and experience in fifteenth century Italy: A primer in the social history of pictorial style. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
BecherT. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
8.
BeckerH. S. (1982). Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
BeckerH. S.GeerB.HughesE.StraussA. (1961). Boys in white: Student culture in medical school. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
BoltanskiL.ThévenotL. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
BourdieuP. (1993). The field of cultural production. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
ChildressC. C.GerberA. (2015). The MFA in creative writing: The uses of a “useless” credential. Professions and Professionalism, 5, 1-16.
18.
ElkinsJ. (2001). Why art cannot be taught. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
19.
FineG. A. (2017). Medium rare: The culture of practice and the practice of culture in art education. Unpublished manuscript.
20.
FrenetteA. (2013). Making the intern economy: Role and career challenges of the music industry intern.”Work and Occupations, 40, 364-397.
21.
FrenetteA.TepperS. (2016). What difference does it make? Assessing the effects of arts-based training on career pathways. In ComunianR.GilmoreA. (Eds.), Beyond the campus: Higher education and the creative economy (pp. 83-101). New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
GerberA. (2016). Art work? Making cents and nonsense of art. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
23.
GerberA.ChildressC. (2017). The economic world obverse: Freedom through markets after arts education. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(12), 1532-1554.
24.
GiuffreK. (1999). Sandpiles of opportunity: Success in the art world. Social Forces, 77, 815-832.
25.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
26.
GroysB. (2009). Education by infection. In MadoffS. H. (Ed.), Art school (Propositions for the 21st Century) (pp. 25-32). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
HickeyD. (2007). Issues & Commentary. Art schools: A group crit. Art in America, May, 99-113.
28.
HorowitzN. (2011). The art of the deal: Contemporary art in a global financial market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
KarpikL. (2010). Valuing the unique: The economics of singularities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
King-HammondL. (2007). Issues & Commentary. Art schools: A group crit. Art in America, May, 99-113.
31.
LarsonM. S. (1979). The rise of professionalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
32.
LloydR. (2010). Neo-Bohemia: Art and commerce in the post-industrial city. New York: Routledge.
33.
MadoffS. H. (Ed.). (2009). Art school (Propositions for the 21st century). Cambridge: MIT Press.
34.
MengerP.-M. (1999). Artistic labor markets and careers. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 541-574.
35.
MengerP.-M. (2014). The economics of creativity: Art and achievement under uncertainty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
MurrayE. (2008). In NesbettP.BancroftS.AndressS (Eds.), Letters to a young artist (pp. 23-24). New York, NY: Darte.
37.
OakleyK. (2009). From Bohemia to Britart: Art students over 50 years. Cultural Trends, 18, 281-294.
38.
PinheiroD.DowdT. (2009). All that jazz: The success of jazz musicians in three metropolitan areas. Poetics, 37, 490-506.
39.
RelyeaL. (2014). Your everyday art world. Cambridge: MIT Press.
ThorntonS. (2008). Seven days in the art world. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
49.
VelthuisO. (2005). Talking prices: Symbolic meaning of prices on the market for contemporary art. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
WhiteH.WhiteC. (1965). Canvases and careers: Institutional change in the French painting world. New York. NY: Wiley.
51.
WhiteR. (2015). The contemporaries: Travels in the 21st century art world. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
52.
WithamL. (2012). Art schooled: A year among prodigies, rebels, and visionaries at a world-class art college. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.
53.
WitkinR. (1974). The intelligence of feeling. London, England: Heinemann.
54.
WohlH. (2016). Signature styles: The production of uniqueness. Unpublished manuscript. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
55.
ZelizerV. (2005). The purchase of intimacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56.
ZuckermanE.KimT.-Y.UkanwaK.Von RittmanJ. (2003). Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature-film labor market. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 1018-1074.
