Prior research has examined the incorporation outcomes among unauthorized migrants after implementation of the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA). However, few studies have evaluated how legalization opportunities produce gendered outcomes among the second-generation children of unauthorized immigrants. We examine the association of legalization opportunities provided through IRCA with the years of schooling attained by the sons and daughters of Mexican American immigrants. By distinguishing likely eligibility for one of two programs implemented under IRCA—the Legally Authorized Workers and Special Agricultural Workers programs—we consider whether type of legalization program matters by assessing gender differences in schooling among children of Mexican immigrants. Although legalization provides a substantial educational premium for the children of Mexican immigrants regardless of gender, the size of the legalization premium is smaller, on average, for sons than daughters. The advantage to daughters is especially notable among those with parents eligible for the Special Agricultural Workers program. We consider these findings in the context of theories of immigrant incorporation and intergenerational mobility.
AguileraM. B.MasseyD. S. (2003). Social capital and the wages of Mexican migrants: New hypotheses and tests. Social Forces, 82, 671-701.
2.
Amuedo-DorantesC.LopezM. J. (2017). The hidden educational costs of intensified immigration enforcement. Southern Economic Journal, 84, 120-154. doi:10.1002/soej.12207
3.
BachmeierJ. D.BeanF. D. (2011). Ethnoracial patterns of schooling and work among adolescents: Implications for Mexican immigrant incorporation. Social Science Research, 40, 1579-1595.
4.
BarajasH. L.PierceJ. L. (2001). The significance of race and gender in school success among Latinas and Latinos in college. Gender & Society, 15, 859-878.
5.
BeanF. D.BrownS. K. (2014). Demographic analyses of immigration. In BrettellC. E.HollifieldJ. P. (Eds.), Migration theory: Talking across disciplines (3rd ed., pp. 67-89). New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
BeanF. D.BrownS. K.BachmeierJ. D. (2015). Parents without papers: The progress and pitfalls of Mexican American integration. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
7.
BeanF. D.LeachM. A.BrownS. K.BachmeierJ. D.HippJ. R. (2011). The educational legacy of unauthorized migration: Comparisons across U.S.-immigrant groups in how parents’ status affects their offspring. International Migration Review, 45, 348-385.
8.
BeanF. D.VernezG.KeelyC. B. (1989). Opening and closing the doors: Evaluating immigration reform and control. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
9.
BrownS. K.BeanF. D. (2016). Migration status and political knowledge among Latino immigrants. RSF: Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(3), 22-41.
10.
BrownS. K.SanchezA. J. (2017). Parental legal status and the political engagement of second-generation Mexican Americans. RSF: Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 3(4), 136-147.
11.
BuchmannC.DiPreteT. A. (2006). The growing female advantage in college completion: The role of family background and academic achievement. American Sociological Review, 71, 515-541.
12.
CorneliusW. A. (1989). Impacts of the 1986 immigration law on emigration from rural Mexican sending communities. Population and Development Review, 15, 689-705.
13.
DiPreteT. A.BuchmannC. (2013). The rise of women: The growing gender gap in education and what it means for American schools. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
14.
DonatoK. M.CarterR. S. (1999). Mexico and U.S. policy on illegal immigration: A fifty-year retrospective. In HainesD. W.RosenblumK. E. (Eds.), Illegal immigration in America: A reference handbook (pp. 112-132). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
15.
DonatoK. M.DurandJ.MasseyD. S. (1992a). Changing conditions in the US labor market: Effects of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. Population Research and Policy Review, 11, 93-115.
16.
DonatoK. M.DurandJ.MasseyD. S. (1992b). Stemming the tide? Assessing the deterrent effects of the Immigration Reform and Control Act. Demography, 29, 139-157.
17.
DonatoK. M.MasseyD. S. (1993). Effect of the Immigration Reform and Control Act on the Wages of Mexican Migrants. Social Science Quarterly, 74, 523-541.
18.
DonatoK. M.SiskB. (2012). Shifts in the employment outcomes among Mexican migrants to the United States. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30, 63-77.
19.
DonatoK. M.WakabayashiC.HakimzadehS.ArmentaA. (2008). Shifts in the employment conditions of Mexican migrant men and women: The effect of U.S. immigration policy. Work and Occupations, 35, 462-495.
20.
DrebyJ. (2012). The burden of deportation on children in Mexican immigrant families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 829-845.
21.
DrebyJ. (2015). Everyday illegal: When policies undermine immigrant families. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
EnriquezL. E. (2015). Multigenerational punishment: Shared experiences of undocumented immigration status within mixed-status families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 939-953.
23.
EspirituY. L. (2001). “We don’t sleep around like White girls do”: Family, culture, and gender in Filipina American lives. Signs, 26, 415-440.
24.
FelicianoC. (2005). Educational selectivity in U.S. immigration: How do immigrants compare to those left behind?Demography, 42, 131-152.
25.
FelicianoC. (2006). Beyond the family: The influence of premigration group status on the educational expectations of immigrants’ children. Sociology of Education, 79, 281-303.
26.
FelicianoC. (2012). The female educational advantage among adolescent children of immigrants. Youth & Society, 44, 431-449.
27.
FelicianoC.RumbautR. G. (2005). Gendered paths: Educational and occupational expectations and outcomes among adult children of immigrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28, 1087-1118.
28.
GonzalezA. (2003). The education and wages of immigrant children: The impact of age at arrival. Economics of Education Review, 22, 203-212.
29.
González BakerS. (1990). The cautious welcome: The legalization programs of the Immigrant Reform and Control Act. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
30.
Gonzalez-BarreraA. (2015). More Mexicans leaving than coming to the U.S. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
31.
HochschildJ. L.ChattopadhyayJ.GayC.Jones-CorreaM. (2013). Outsiders no more? Models of immigrant political incorporation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
HochschildJ. L.MollenkopfJ. H. (2009). Bringing outsiders in: Transatlantic perspectives on immigrant political incorporation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
33.
LeeJ.ZhouM. (2015). The Asian American achievement paradox. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
34.
LópezN. (2003). Hopeful girls, troubled boys: Race and gender disparity in urban education. New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
MasseyD. S. (2013). America’s immigration policy Fiasco: Learning from past mistakes. Dædalus, 142(3), 5-15.
36.
MotomuraH. (2014). Immigration outside the law. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
37.
OrreniusP. M.ZavodnyM. (2003). Do amnesty programs reduce undocumented immigration? Evidence from IRCA. Demography, 40, 437-450.
38.
OrreniusP. M.ZavodnyM. (2012). The economic consequences of amnesty for unauthorized immigrants. Cato Journal, 32(1), 85-106.
39.
PanY. (2007). Gains from green cards: Immigrant parents’ legal status and children’s scholastic achievement. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1071202
40.
PhillipsJ. A.MasseyD. S. (1999). The new labor market: Immigrants and wages after IRCA. Demography, 36, 233-246.
41.
PowersM. G.SeltzerW.ShiJ. (1998). Gender differences in the occupational status of undocumented immigrants in the United States: Experience before and after legalization. International Migration Review, 32, 1015-1046.
42.
QinD. B. (2006). The role of gender in immigrant children’s educational adaptation. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 9(1), 8-19.
43.
RiosmenaF. (2010). Policy shocks: On the legal auspices of Latin American migration to the United States. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 630, 270-293.
44.
RumbautR. G.BeanF. D.ChavezL.LeeJ.BrownS. K.DeSipioL.ZhouM. (2008). Immigration and Intergenerational Mobility in Metropolitan Los Angeles (IIMMLA). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
45.
RytinaN. (2002). IRCA legalization effects: Lawful permanent residence and naturalization through 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service.
46.
SmithR. C. (2002). Gender, ethnicity, and race in school and work outcomes of second-generation Mexican Americans. In Suárez-OrozcoM. M.PáezM. M. (Eds.), Latinos: Remaking America (pp. 110-125). Berkeley: University of California Press.
47.
SmithR. C. (2006). Mexican New York: Transnational lives of new immigrants. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48.
SorensonE.BeanF. D. (1994). The Immigration Reform and Control Act and the wages of Mexican origin workers: Evidence from Current Population Surveys. Social Science Quarterly, 75, 1-17.
49.
TiendaM.SánchezS. M. (2013). Latin American immigration to the United States. Dædalus, 142(3), 48-64.
50.
ValenzuelaA.Jr., (1999). Gender roles and settlement activities among children and their immigrant families. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 720-742.
51.
WoodrowK. A.PasselJ. S. (1990). Post-IRCA undocumented immigration to the United States: An assessment based on the June 1988 CPS. In BeanF. D.EdmonstonB.PasselJ. S. (Eds.), Undocumented migration to the United States: IRCA and the experience of the 1980s (pp. 33-76). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
52.
YoshikawaH. (2011). Immigrants raising citizens: Unauthorized parents and their young children. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
