A growing body of research examines the experiences of highly skilled individuals who “return” to work in their ancestral homeland, but has tended to overlook the gendered dynamics that shape their decisions. This article fills this gap by analyzing how the gendered local context of China affects the experiences of American-Born Chinese (ABC) migrants. Through in-depth qualitative interviews with 52 second-generation ABC professionals in Beijing and Shanghai, I found that both women and men enjoyed comparable career growth and opportunities. Socially, however, men’s foreign citizenship, education, and higher wages transformed them into highly eligible dating and marriage partners, while ABC women were stigmatized as “leftover women” (a social category ascribed to urban, educated single women in China). Thus, ABC women must prioritize either their professional or personal lives, while their male counterparts can enjoy both. By highlighting the personal realm, this case reveals how the trajectories of first-world ancestral homeland migrants are uniquely gendered.
ApplebyR. (2014). Men and masculinities in global English language teaching. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
2.
BalistreriK. S.JoynerK.KaoG. (2015). Relationship involvement among young adults: Are Asian American men an exceptional case?Population Research and Policy Review, 34, 709-732.
3.
BaschL.Glick SchillerN.Szanton BlancC. (Eds.). (1994). Nations unbound: Transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments, and deterritorialized nation states (1st ed.). Abingdon, England: Gordon and Breach.
4.
CarrollW. K. (2009). Transnationalists and national networkers in the global corporate elite. Global Networks, 9, 289-314.
5.
CassarinoJ. (2004). Theorising return migration: The conceptual approach to return migrants revisited. International Journal on Multicultural Societies, 6, 253-279.
ChoJ. S. P. (2012). Global fatigue: Transnational markets, linguistic capital, and Korean-American male English teachers in South Korea. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16, 218-237.
8.
ChristouA. (2003). Migrating gender: Feminist geographies in women’s biographies of return migration. Michigan Feminist Studies, 17, 71-103.
9.
CookS.DongX. (2011). Harsh choices: Chinese women’s paid work and unpaid care responsibilities under economic reform. Development and Change, 42, 947-965.
DavisD.HarrellS. (1993). Chinese families in the post-Mao era. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
DikotterF. (1992). The discourse of race in modern China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
DonatoK. M.GabacciaD. (2015). Gender and international migration. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
14.
DonatoK. M.GabacciaD.HoldawayJ.ManalansanM.PessarP. R. (2006). A glass half full? Gender in migration studies. International Migration Review, 40, 3-26.
15.
EngD. L. (2001). Racial castration: Managing masculinity in Asian America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
16.
EspirituY. L. (2008). Asian American women and men: Labor, laws, and love (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
17.
FarrerJ. (2010). A foreign adventurer’s paradise? Interracial sexuality and alien sexual capital in reform era Shanghai. Sexualities, 13, 69-95.
18.
FarrerJ.DaleS. (2013). Sexless in Shanghai: Gendered mobility strategies in a transnational sexual field. In GreenA. I. (Ed.), Sexual fields: Toward a sociology of collective sexual life (pp. 143-169). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
FechterA. (2012). Transnational lives: Expatriates in Indonesia. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
20.
FincherL. H. (2014). Leftover women: The resurgence of gender inequality in China. London, England: Zed Books.
21.
FismanR.IyengarS. S.KamenicaE.SimonsonI. (2008). Racial preferences in dating. Review of Economic Studies, 75, 117-132.
22.
FonerN. (2005). In a new land: A comparative view of immigration. New York: New York University Press.
23.
GreenhalghS. (2008). Just one child: Science and policy in Deng’s China. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
HanserA. (2005). The gendered rice bowl: The sexual politics of service work in urban China. Gender & Society, 19, 581-600.
25.
HarveyW. (2012). Brain circulation to the UK?Journal of Management Development, 31, 173-186.
26.
HershatterG. (2007). Women in China’s long twentieth century. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
HoE. (2016). China’s diaspora and return migration. In IredaleR.GuoF. (Eds.), Handbook of Chinese migration (pp. 199-214). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
28.
HoangK. K. (2015). Dealing in desire: Asian ascendancy, Western decline, and the hidden currencies of global sex work. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
Hondagneu-SoteloP. (2003). Gender and U.S. immigration: Contemporary trends. Berkeley: University of California Press.
HwangWei-Chin. (2013). Who are people willing to date? Ethnic and gender patterns in online dating. Race and Social Problems, 5(1), 28-40.
32.
JainS. (2011). The rights of ‘Return’: Ethnic identities in the workplace among second-generation Indian-American professionals in the Parental Homeland. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(9), 1313-1330.
33.
JainS. (2013). For love and money: Second-generation Indian-Americans “return” to India. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36, 896-914.
34.
KelskyK. (2001). Women on the verge: Japanese women, Western dreams. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
35.
KibriaN. (2002). Of blood, belonging, and homeland trips: Transnationalism and identity among second-generation Chinese and Korean Americans. In LevittP.WatersM. (Eds.), The changing face of home: The transnational lives of the second generation (pp. 295-311). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
36.
KingR.ChristouA. (2011). Of counter-diaspora and reverse transnationalism: Return mobilities to and from the ancestral homeland. Mobilities, 6, 451-466.
37.
LanP. (2011). White privilege, language capital and cultural ghettoisation: Western high-skilled migrants in Taiwan. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37, 1669-1693.
38.
LeeH. K. (2013). “I’m my mother’s daughter, I’m my husband’s wife, I’m my child’s mother, I’m nothing else”: Resisting traditional Korean roles as Korean American working women in Seoul, South Korea. Women’s Studies International Forum, 36, 37-43.
39.
LeeJ.ZhouM. (2015). The Asian American achievement paradox. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
40.
LeyD.KobayashiA. (2005). Back to Hong Kong: Return migration or transnational sojourn?Global Networks, 5, 111-127.
41.
LouieA. (2004). Chineseness across borders. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
42.
MahlerS. J.PessarP. R. (2006). Gender matters: Ethnographers bring gender from the periphery toward the core of migration studies. International Migration Review, 40, 27-63.
NapierN.TaylorS. (2002). Experiences of women professionals abroad: Comparisons across Japan, China and Turkey. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13, 837-851.
Nguyen-AkbarM. (2014). The tensions of diasporic ‘return’migration: how class and money create distance in the Vietnamese transnational family. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43(2), 176-201.
48.
Nguyen-AkbarM. (2016). Finding the American dream abroad? Narratives of return among 1.5 and second generation Vietnamese American skilled migrants in Vietnam. Journal of Vietnamese Studies, 11(2), 96-121.
49.
OngA. (1999). Flexible citizenship: The cultural logics of transnationality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
50.
PhillipsJ.PotterR. B. (2005). Incorporating race and gender into Caribbean return migration: The example of second generation “Bajan-Brits.” In PotterR. B.ConwayD.PhillipsJ. (Eds.), Experience of return migration: Caribbean perspectives (pp. 69-88). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
51.
QianZ.LichterD. T. (2007). Social boundaries and marital assimilation: Interpreting trends in racial and ethnic intermarriage. American Sociological Review, 72, 68-94.
52.
QianZ.LichterD. T. (2011). Changing patterns of interracial marriage in a multiracial society. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73, 1065-1084.
SaxenianA. (2005). From brain drain to brain circulation: Transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China. Studies in Comparative International Development, 40, 35-61.
57.
ShekY. L. (2007). Asian American masculinity: A review of the literature. Journal of Men’s Studies, 14, 379-391.
58.
SklairL. (2001). The transnational capitalist class. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
59.
SmithM. P. (2005). Transnational urbanism revisited. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(2), 235-244.
60.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61.
TaylorS.NapierN. (1996). Working in Japan: Lessons from women expatriates. MIT Sloan Management Review, 37(3), 76.
62.
ThaiH. C. (2008). For better or for worse: Vietnamese international marriages in the new global economy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
ToS. (2013). Understanding sheng nu (“leftover women”): The phenomenon of late marriage among Chinese professional women. Symbolic Interaction, 36, 1-20.
65.
TsudaT. (2009). Diasporic homecomings: Ethnic return migration in comparative perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
66.
UedaN. (2009). Chinese Americans in China: Ethnicity, transnationalism, and roots tourism (Doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
67.
WaldingerR. (2015). The cross-border connection: Immigrants, emigrants, and their homelands. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68.
WangL. (2016). The benefits of in-betweenness: Return migration of second-generation Chinese American professionals to China. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42, 1941-1958.
WessendorfS. (2007). “Roots migrants”: Transnationalism and “return” among second-generation Italians in Switzerland. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33, 1083-1102.
71.
YamashiroJ. H. (2017). Redefining Japaneseness: Japanese Americans in the ancestral homeland. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
ZuoJ. (2013). Women’s liberation and gender obligation equality in urban China: Work/family experiences of married individuals in the 1950s. Science & Society, 77(1), 98-125.
74.
ZippelK. (2017). Women in global science: Advancing academic careers through international collaboration. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
