Evidence suggests that incidental national flag exposure activates nationalistic feelings and that incidental exposure to the EU flag can affect citizen attachments to Europe. However, we know little about what inferences citizens make based on the EU flag when they see it displayed by parties in an electoral context. To test the expectation that this display affects citizens’ evaluations of party elites’ EU attachment, we conducted a large-scale experiment embedded in a Swedish survey in which respondents were exposed to communications from one of the two main Swedish parties, containing or not containing the image of the flag. We find that simple visual display does little to move perceptions. However, if citizens perceive that a particular party displayed the flag, then they are more likely to evaluate its party elites as more attached to Europe.
AndersonB. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York, NY: Verso.
2.
BakkerR.De VriesC.EdwardsE.HoogheL.JollyS.MarksG.. . . VachudovaM. A. (2015). Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999-2010. Party Politics, 21, 143-152.
3.
BoomgaardenH. G.SchuckA. R.ElenbaasM.de VreeseC. H. (2011). Mapping EU attitudes: Conceptual and empirical dimensions of Euroscepticism and EU support. European Union Politics, 12, 241-266.
4.
BruterM. (2003). Winning hearts and minds for Europe: The impact of news and symbols on civic and cultural European identity. Comparative Political Studies, 36, 1148-1179.
5.
BruterM. (2009). Time bomb? The dynamic effect of news and symbols on the political identity of European citizens. Comparative Political Studies, 42, 1498-1536.
6.
ButzD. A.PlantE. A.DoerrC. E. (2007). Liberty and justice for all? Implications of exposure to the U.S. flag for intergroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 396-408.
7.
CareyS. (2002). Undivided loyalties is national identity an obstacle to European integration?European Union Politics, 3, 387-413.
8.
CramL.PatrikiosS.MitchellJ. (2011, September). What does the European Union mean to its citizens? Implicit triggers, identity(ies) and attitudes toward the European Union. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seattle, WA. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1900063
9.
GabelM.ScheveK. (2007). Mixed messages: Party dissent and mass opinion on European integration, European Union Politics, 8, 37-59.
10.
HallC. C.GorenA.ChaikenS.TodorovA. (2009). Shallow cues with deep effects: Trait judgments from faces and voting decisions. In BorgidaE.FedericoC. M.SullivanJ. L. (Eds.), The political psychology of democratic citizenship (pp. 73-100). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
HoggM. A. (2006). Social identity theory. In BurkeP. J. (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 111-137). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
ImaiK.KeeleL.TingleyD.YamamotoT. (2011). Unpacking the black box of causality: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. American Political Science Review, 105, 765-789.
13.
KalmoeN. P.GrossK. (2015). Cueing patriotism, prejudice, and partisanship in the age of Obama: Experimental tests of U.S. flag imagery effects in presidential elections. Political Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/pops.12305
14.
KemmelmeierM.WinterD. G. (2008). Sowing patriotism, but reaping nationalism? Consequences of exposure to the American flag. Political Psychology, 29, 859-879.
15.
KraussR. M.AppleW.MorencyN.WenzelC.WintonW. (1981). Verbal, vocal, and visible factors in judgments of another’s affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 312-320.
16.
MannersI. (2011). Symbolism in European integration. Comparative European Politics, 9, 243-268.
17.
MartinssonJ.AndreassonM.MarkstedtE.RiedelK. (2013). Technical Report Citizen Panel 8-2013. Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg, LORE.
18.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2011). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
19.
NagelF.MaurerM.ReinemannC. (2012). Is there a visual dominance in political communication? How verbal, visual, and vocal communication shape viewers’ impressions of political candidates. Journal of Communication, 62, 833-850.
20.
NorrisP. (Ed.). (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
PopaS. A.DumitrescuD. (2015). National but European? Visual manifestations of Europe in national parties’ Euromanifestos since 1979. Party Politics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1354068815610963
22.
RaunioT. (2007). Softening but persistent: Euroscepticism in the Nordic EU Countries. Acta Politica, 42, 191-210.
23.
RayL. (2003). When parties matter: The conditional influence of party positions on voter opinions about European integration. Journal of Politics, 65, 978-994.
24.
SeguraG.JackmanS.HutchingsV. & American National Election Studies. (2012, March19). American National Election studies: Evaluations of government and society study 1 (EGSS 1), 2010-2012 (ICPSR32701-v1). Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32701.v1
25.
SchatzR. T.LavineH. (2007). Waving the flag: National symbolism, social identity, and political engagement. Political Psychology, 28, 329-355.
26.
SchmittH.BartoliniS.BrugW.EijkC.FranklinM.FuchsD.. . . ThomassenJ. (2009). European election study 2004 (2nd ed.) [ZA4566 Data file Version 2.0.0]. Cologne, Germany: GESIS Data Archive. doi:10.4232/1.10086
27.
ShahD. V.HannaA.BucyE. P.WellsC.QuevedoV. (2015). The power of television images in a social media age: Linking biobehavioral and computational approaches via the second screen. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659, 225-245.
28.
ShahD. V.HannaA.BucyE. P.LassenD. S.Van ThommeJ.BialikK.. . . PevehouseJ. C. W. (2016). Dual screening during presidential debates: Political nonverbals and the volume and valence of online expression. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(14), 1816-1843.
29.
SitterN. (2001). The politics of opposition and European integration in Scandinavia: Is Euro-scepticism a government-opposition dynamic?West European Politics, 24(4), 22-39.
30.
SpezioM. L.LoeschL.GosselinF.MattesK.AlvarezR. M. (2012). Thin-slice decisions do not need faces to be predictive of election outcomes. Political Psychology, 33, 331-341.
SteenbergenM. R.EdwardsE. E.de VriesC. E. (2007). Who’s cueing whom? Mass-elite linkages and the future of European integration. European Union Politics, 8, 13-35.
33.
StetsJ. E.BurkeP. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 224-237.
34.
ZallerJ. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
