Using a pretest and posttest online experiment (N = 105), this study empirically explored the impact of native advertising sponsorship disclosure on organization–public relationships (OPR), credibility, brand attitude, and attitude toward the advertisement. Credibility and brand attitude predicted the two OPR factors; however, OPR was not affected by participants’ cognizance of ad sponsorship/disclosure. Brand attitude for obviously sponsored (e.g., ad disclosed) content decreased slightly. However, the presence or absence of sponsorship did not significantly influence either credibility or attitudes toward the advertisement itself. The study also examined perceived information utility.
AakerD. A.StaymanD. M. (1990). Measuring audience perceptions of commercials and relating them to ad impact. Journal of Advertising Research, 30(4), 7-17.
2.
AlbionM. S.FarrisP. W. (1981). The advertising controversy: Evidence on the economic effects of advertising. Boston, MA: Auburn House.
3.
BakerE. M.BakerW. H.TedescoJ. C. (2007). Organizations respond to phishing: Exploring the public relations tackle box. Communication Research Reports, 24, 327-339.
4.
BrownC.WaltzerH.WaltzerM. B. (2001). Daring to be heard: Advertorials by organized interests on the op-ed page of The New York Times, 1985-1998. Political Communication, 18, 23-50.
5.
BruningS. D. (2000). Examining the role that personal, professional, and community relationships play in respondent relationship recognition and intended behavior. Communication Quarterly, 48(4), 437-448.
6.
BruningS. D.RalstonM. (2001). Using a relational approach to retaining students and building mutually beneficial student-university relationships. Southern Communication Journal, 66, 337-345.
7.
CameronG. T. (1994). Does publicity outperform advertising: An experimental test of the third-party endorsement. Journal of Public Relations Research, 6, 39-49.
Derville GallicanoT. (2009). Personal relationship strategies and the outcomes of personal relations in a multi-tiered membership organization. Gainesville, FL: Institute for Public Relations.
10.
DeshpandeA.MenonA.PerriM.IIIZinkahnG. (2004). Direct-to-consumer advertising and its utility in health care decision making: A consumer perspective. Journal of Health Communication, 9, 499-513.
11.
DucoffeR. H. (1995). How consumers assess the value of advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 17(1), 1-18.
FergusonM. A. (1984, August). Building theory in public relations: Interorganizational relationships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Gainesville, FL.
14.
FriestadM.WrightP. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 1-31.
15.
GardnerM. P. (1985). Does attitude toward the ad affect brand attitude under a brand evaluation set?Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 192-198.
16.
GolanG. J.ViatchaninovaE. (2014). The advertorial as a tool of mediated public diplomacy: Russia’s outreach in India and the United States. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1268-1288.
17.
GrunigJ. E. (1993). Public relations and international affairs: Effects, ethics and responsibility. Journal of International Affairs, 47, 137-162.
18.
HallahanK. (1999). Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11, 205-242.
19.
HayesA. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling.
20.
HonL. C.GrunigJ. (1999). Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations. Gainesville, FL: Institute for Public Relations.
21.
HuhJ.DeLormeD. E.ReidL. N. (2004). The information utility of DTC prescription drug advertising. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 788-806. doi:10.1177/107769900408100405
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (2009). In blog we trust? Deciphering credibility of components of the Internet among politically interested Internet users. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 175-182.
24.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (2010). Choosing is believing? How web gratifications and reliance affect Internet credibility among politically interested users. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 18, 1-21.
25.
KelleherT. (2009). Conversational voice, communicated commitment, and public relations outcomes in interactive online communication. Journal of Communication, 59, 172-188.
26.
KelleherT.MillerB. M. (2006). Organizational blogs and the human voice: Relational strategies and relational outcomes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 395-414.
27.
KiE. J.HonL. C. (2007). Testing the linkages among the organization-public relationships and attitude and behavioral intentions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19, 1-23.
28.
KimB. H.PasadeosY.BarbanA. (2001). On the deceptive effectiveness of labeled and unlabeled advertorial formats. Mass Communication and Society, 4, 265-281.
29.
LedinghamJ. A. (2001). Government-community relationships: Extending the relational theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 27, 285-296.
RichardsJ. I.CurranC. M. (2002). Oracles on “advertising”: Searching for a definition. Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 63-77.
32.
RozendaalE.BuijzenM.ValkenburgP. (2010). Comparing children’s and adults’ cognitive advertising competences in the Netherlands. Journal of Children and Media, 4(1), 77-89.
33.
SallotL. M.LyonL. J.Acosta-AlzuruC.JonesK. O. (2003). From aardvark to zebra: A new millennium analysis of theory development in public relations academic journals. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15, 27-90.
34.
SpearsN.SinghS. N. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 26(2), 53-66.
35.
SweetserK. D. (2010). A losing strategy: The impact of nondisclosure in social media on relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22, 288-312.
36.
SweetserK. D. (2015). Exploring the political organization-public relationship in terms of relationship, personality, loyalty, and outcomes among first-time voters. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 9, 217-234.
37.
SweetserK. D.MetzgarE. (2007). Communicating during crisis: Use of blogs as a relationship management tool. Public Relations Review, 33, 340-342.
38.
SweetserK. D.TedescoJ. C. (2014). Effects of exposure and messaging on political organization–public relationships exemplified in the candidate-constituent relationship. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 776-793.
39.
SweetserK. D.EnglishK.FernandesJ. (2015). Super PACs and strong relationships: The impact of digital interaction on the political organization–public relationship. Journal of Public Relations Research, 27, 101-117.
40.
VerčičD.VerčičA. T. (2015). The new publicity: From reflexive to reflective mediatisation. Public Relations Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.07.008
41.
WojdynskiB. W.EvansN. J. (2016). Going native: Effects of disclosure position and language on the recognition and evaluation of online native advertising. Journal of Advertising, 45, 157-168.
