The article analyzes the evolution of state law pluralism in the field of personal status law in India and Indonesia in the postcolonial era. Having inherited pluri-legal personal law systems from their colonial patrons, postindependence leaders in both countries vowed to eliminate and replace pluri-legal arrangements by uniform civil law systems that would not discriminate on the basis of ethnicity, custom, or religion. Despite their attempts at legal unification from the 1940s to 1960s, however, both nations today exhibit high degrees of state law pluralism in personal law. We show that plans for legal unification were abandoned in both countries in the 1970s, and that the turn away from legal unification was mostly driven by concerns of political stability and electoral politics, not, as is often argued in the literature, due to state incapacity or ideological reorientations on part of the ruling elite.
AmbedkarB. (1995). Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, writings and speeches (MoonV., Ed., Vol. 14, Part I). Mumbai, Maharashtra, India: Government of Maharashtra.
2.
AndersonJ. N. D. (1958). The Tunisian law of personal status. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 7, 262-279.
AspinallE. (2013). How Indonesia Survived: Comparative Perspectives on State Disintegration and Democratic Integration. In KünklerM.StepanA. C. (Eds.), Democracy and Islam in Indonesia (pp. 126-146). New York: Columbia University Press.
5.
AustinG. (2001). Religion, personal law, and identity in India. In LarsonG. J. (Ed.), Religion and personal law in secular India: A call to judgment (pp. 15-23). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
6.
BeckC. J.DroriG. S.MeyerJ. W. (2012). World influences on human rights language in constitutions: A cross-national study. International Sociology, 27, 483-501.
7.
BellG. F. (2006). Multiculturalism in Law is Legal Pluralism-Lessons from Indonesia, Singapore and Canada. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 315-330.
8.
BenhabibS. (2002). The claims of culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
BennettT. W.PeartN. S. (1983). The dualism of marriage laws in Africa. In BennettT. W. (Ed.), Family law in the last two decades of the twentieth century (pp. 145-170). Cape Town, South Africa: Juta.
10.
BentonL. A. (2002). Law and colonial cultures: Legal regimes in world history, 1400-1900. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11.
BhargavaR. (2002). What is Indian secularism and what is it for?India Review, 1(1), 1-32.
12.
BogaardsM. (2014). Democracy and social peace in divided societies: exploring consociational parties. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
ButtS. (2008). Polygamy and mixed marriage in Indonesia: Islam and marriage law in the courts. In LindseyT. (Ed.), Indonesia: Law and society (pp. 266-287). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
14.
ChhibberP. K. (1999). Democracy without associations: Transformation of the party system and social cleavages in India. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
15.
DerrettJ. D. M. (1999). Religion, law and the state in India. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
16.
DeshtaK. (2002). Uniform civil code in retrospect and prospect. New Delhi, India: Deep and Deep.
17.
Doorn-HarderP. v. (2006). Women shaping Islam: Indonesian women reading the Qurʾan. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
18.
ElkinsZ.GinsburgT.SimmonsB. (2013). Getting to rights: Treaty ratification, constitutional convergence, and human rights practice. Harvard International Law Journal, 54, 61-95.
19.
ElsenhansH.OuaissaR.SchweckeS.TétreaultM. A. (2015). The transformation of politicised religion: From zealots into leaders. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
20.
FederspielH. M. (1998). Islamic Values, Law, and Expectations in Contemporary Indonesia. Islamic Law and Society, 5(1), 90-117.
21.
FitzpatrickP. (1983). Law, plurality and underdevelopment. In SugarmanD. (Ed.), Legality, ideology and the state (pp. 159-182). London, England: Academic Press.
22.
GajendragadkarP. B. (1971). Secularism and the Constitution of India. Mumbai, Maharashtra, India: University of Mumbai.
23.
GalanterM. (1966). The modernization of law. In WeinerM. (Ed.), Modernization: The dynamics of growth (pp. 153-165). New York, NY: Basic Books.
24.
GalanterM. (1981). Justice in many rooms: Courts, private ordering, and indigenous law. Journal of Legal Pluralism, 19, 1-47.
25.
GangulyS. (2003). The crisis of Indian secularism. Journal of Democracy, 14(4), 11-25.
26.
GoJ. (2003). A globalizing constitutionalism? Views from the postcolony, 1945-2000. International Sociology, 18, 71-95.
27.
GriffithsJ. (1986). What is legal pluralism?Journal of Legal Pluralism, 24, 1-55.
28.
HansenT. B.JaffrelotC. (1998). The BJP after the 1996 elections. In The BJP and the compulsions of politics in India (pp. 1-20). New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
HasanZ. (1994). Minority identity, state policy and the political process. In HasanZ. (Ed.), Forging identities: Gender, communities and the state (pp. 59-73). New Delhi, India: Kali for Women.
31.
HasanZ. (1999). Muslim women and the debate on legal reforms. In RayB.BasuA. (Eds.), From independence towards freedom: Indian women since 1947 (pp. 120-134). New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
32.
HibbardS. W. (2010). Religious politics and secular states: Egypt, India and the United States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
33.
HookerM. B. (1975). Legal pluralism: An introduction to colonial and neo-colonial laws. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
34.
KelsenH. (1945). General theory of law and state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
KünklerM. (in press). Constitutionalism, Islamic law, and religious freedom in post-independence Indonesia. In BaliA.LernerH. (Eds.), Constitution-writing, religion and democracyCambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
36.
KünklerM.SezginY. (2014, December). Does legal pluralism enhance or impede human rights: Re-evaluating the effect with a new multi-methodological tool-the legal pluralism index. Presented at the International Conference at Litteraturhuset, Oslo, Norway.
37.
KymlickaW. (1996). Two Models of Pluralism and Tolerance. In HeydD. (Ed.), Toleration: An Elusive Virtue (pp. 81-113). Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press.
38.
LarsonG. J. (2001). Religion and personal law in secular India: A call to judgment. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
39.
LevD. S. (1972). Islamic courts in Indonesia; A study in the political bases of legal institutions. Berkeley,: University of California Press.
40.
LevD. S. (2000). Legal evolution and political authority in Indonesia: Selected essays. The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
41.
LindseyT.ButtS. (2013). Unfinished Business: Law Reform. In KünklerM.StepanA. C. (Eds.), Democracy and Islam in Indonesia (pp. 168-186). New York: Columbia University Press.
42.
LukitoR. (2003). Law and politics in post-independence Indonesia: A case study of religious and adat courts. In SalimA.AzraA. (Eds.), Shari‘a and politics in modern Indonesia (pp. 17-32). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
43.
MahmoodT. (1978). Religious Elements in a Secular Marriage Law: A Critique. In BaggaV. (Ed.), Studies in the Hindu marriage and the Special marriage acts. Mumbai: N. M. Tripathi,
44.
MahmoodS. T. (1995). Uniform civil code: Fictions and facts. New Delhi: India and Islam Research Council.
45.
MamdaniM. (1996). Citizen and subject: Contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
MarkandanK. C. (1966). Directive principles in the Indian Constitution. Mumbai: Allied Publishers.
47.
MenskiW. (2009). Indian secular pluralism and its relevance for Europe. In GrilloR.BallardR.FerrariA.HoekemaA.MaussenM.ShahP. (Eds.), Legal practice and cultural diversity (pp. 31-48). Surrey, England: Ashgate.
48.
MenskiW. (2012). Ancient and modern boundary crossings between personal laws and civil law in composite India. In NicholsJ. A. (Ed.), Marriage and divorce in a multicultural context: Multi-tiered marriage and the boundaries of civil law and religion (pp. 219-252). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
49.
MerryS. E. (1988). Legal pluralism. Law & Society Review, 22, 869-896.
ParasharA. (1992). Women and family law reform in India. New Delhi: Sage.
57.
PathakZ.RajanR. S. (1989). Shahbano. Signs, 14, 558-582.
58.
PiersonP. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59.
PoggiG. (1990). The state: Its nature, development, and prospects. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
60.
RajuM. P. (2003). Uniform civil code: A mirage?New Delhi, India: Media House.
61.
RamstedtM. (2004). Introduction: Negotiating identities—Indonesian “Hindus” between local, national, and global interests. In RamstedtM. (Ed.), Hinduism in modern Indonesia: A minority religion between local, national, and global interests (pp. 1-34). New York, NY: RoutledgeCurzon.
62.
RaoA.RaoB. G. (1974). Six thousand days: Jawaharlal Nehru, Prime Minister (1st ed.). New Delhi, India: Sterling.
63.
RaoS. B. (1968). Framing of India’s constitution (Vol. 2). Mumbai, Maharashtra, India: Indian Institute of Public Administration.
64.
ReddingJ. (2010). Institutional v. Liberal contexts for contemporary non-state, Muslim civil dispute resolution systems. Journal of Islamic State Practices in International Law, 6(1), 2-26.
65.
RobertsR. L.MannK. (1991). Law in colonial Africa. In RobertsR. L.MannK. (Eds.), Law in colonial Africa (pp. 3-58). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
66.
SalimA. (2008). Challenging the secular state: The Islamization of law in modern Indonesia. Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.
67.
SangariK. (2000). Gender lines: personal laws, uniform laws, conversion. In ImtiazA.GoshP. S.ReifeldH. (Eds.), Pluralism and equality: Values in Indian society and politics (pp. 271-319). New Delhi: Sage.
68.
SezginY. (2004). A political account for legal confrontation between state and society: The case of Israeli legal pluralism. In SaratA.EwickP. (Eds.), Studies in law, politics, and society (Vol. 32, pp. 199-235). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
69.
SezginY. (2009). Legal unification and nation-building in the postcolonial world: A comparison of Israel and India. Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 8, 273-297.
70.
SezginY. (2013). Human rights under state-enforced religious family laws in Israel, Egypt and India. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
71.
SezginY.KünklerM. (2014). Regulation of “religion” and the “religious”: The politics of judicialization and bureaucratization in India and Indonesia. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 56, 1-31.
72.
SmithD. E. (1963). India as a secular state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
73.
SolankiG. (2011). Adjudication in religious family laws: Cultural accommodation, legal pluralism, and gender equality in India. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
74.
SubramanianN. (2008). Legal change and gender inequality: Changes in Muslim family law in India. Law & Social Inquiry, 33, 631-672.
75.
SubramanianN. (2014). Nation and family: Personal law, cultural pluralism, and gendered citizenship in India. Stanford University Press.
76.
SucharitkulS. (1998). Unification of private law and codification of international law. Uniform Law Review/Revue de Droit Uniforme, 3, 693-701.
77.
Sukarno. (1945). The Birth of Pantja Sila. Reprinted (2007) by FeithH.CastlesL. (Eds.), Indonesian political thinking 1945-1965 (41ff). Singapore: Equinox.
78.
ThelenK. A. (2004). How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
79.
TsutsuiK.WhitlingerC.LimA. (2012). International human rights law and social movements: States’ resistance and civil society’s insistence. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8, 367-369.
80.
VanderlindenJ. (1989). Return to legal pluralism: Twenty years later. Journal of Legal Pluralism, 28, 149-157.
81.
VenterF. (2008). Globalization of constitutional law through comparative constitution-making. Verfassung und Recht in Übersee/Law and Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America, 41(1), 16-31.
82.
YoungC. (1994). The African colonial state in comparative perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
