The candidate selection process in the United States has been, since the second half of the 20th century, one of the most inclusive and decentralized among the developed democracies. While such systems often presuppose party weakness or lack of control over the process, this article shows that patterns of campaign finance indicate that party weakness over candidate selection in the U.S. case may be overestimated. It also argues that a very open selection process offers opportunities for insurgent movements within parties that bring new ideas and demands. Finally, it suggests that political culture may mediate the relationship between party strength and democratized selection methods.
AbramowitzA. I. (2010). The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
AbramowitzA. I. (2011, September). Partisan polarization and the rise of the Tea Party movement. Paper presented at the 2011 American Political Science Association annual meeting, University of California at Berkeley.
AnsolabehereS.SnyderJ. M. (2000). Soft money, hard money, strong parties. Columbia Law Review, 100, 598-619. doi:10.2307/1123496
5.
AtkesonL. R.MaestasC. (2008, January). Racing to the front: The effect of frontloading on presidential primary turnout. Paper presented at the 2008 Reforming the Presidential Nomination Process Conference, Iowa City, IA.
6.
BaileyM. A.MummoloJ.NoelH. (2012). Tea Party influence: A story of activists and elites. American Politics Research, 40, 769-804.
BartelsL. (1992). The impact of electioneering in the United States. In ButlerD.RanneyA. (Eds.), Electioneering: A comparative study of continuity and change (pp. 244-275). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
BlackB. D. (1996). Developments in the state regulation of major and minor political parties. Cornell Law Review, 82, 109-181.
11.
BradyD. W.HanH.PopeJ. C. (2007). Primary elections and candidate ideology: Out of step with the primary electorate?Legislative Studies Quarterly, 32, 79-105.
12.
BroockmanD. E. (2014). Mobilizing candidates: Political actors strategically shape the candidate pool with personal appeals. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1, 104-119.
13.
CaressS. M.KuniokaT. T. (2012). Term limits and their consequences: The aftermath of legislative reform. Albany: State University of New York Press.
14.
CarnesN. (2012). Does the numerical underrepresentation of the working class in Congress matter?Legislative Studies Quarterly, 37, 5-34.
15.
CarnesN. (2015a). Who votes for inequality? In PatashnikE.JenkinsJ. (Eds.), Congress and policymaking in the 21st century (pp. 106-133). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16.
CarnesN. (2015b). Why are there so few working class people in political office? Evidence from state legislatures. Politics, Groups, and Identities. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/21565503.2015.1066689
CarrollS. J.SanbonmatsuK. (2010, September). Can more women run? Reevaluating women’s election to the state legislatures. Paper presented at the 2010 American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
19.
CarrollS. J.SanbonmatsuK. (2013). More women can run: Gender and pathways to the state legislatures. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
CaulM. (1999). Women’s representation in Parliament: The role of political parties. Party Politics, 5, 79-98.
21.
CeaserJ. W. (1981). Direct participation in politics. Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, 34, 121-137.
22.
ChadwickA.HowardP. N. (2010). Introduction: New directions in internet politics research. In ChadwickA.HowardP. N. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Internet politics (pp. 1-10). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
23.
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. 558 U.S. (2010). No. 08-205. Supreme Court of the United States.
Crowder-MeyerM. (2013). Gendered recruitment without trying: How local party recruiters affect women’s representation. Politics & Gender, 9, 390-413.
26.
DabelkoK. L. C.HerrnsonP. S. (1997). Women’s and men’s campaigns for the US House of Representatives. Political Research Quarterly, 50, 121-135.
27.
DaltonR. J.ScarrowS. E.CainB. E. (2003). Democracy transformed? Expanding political opportunities in advanced industrial democracies. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9tg922hv
28.
DarcyR.WelchS.ClarkJ. (1994). Women, elections, and representation (2nd ed.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
29.
Della PortaD.ChironiD. (2015). Movements in parties: OccupyPD. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 8, 59-96.
30.
DesmaraisB. A.La RajaR. J.KowalM. S. (2015). The fates of challengers in U.S. House elections: The role of extended party networks in supporting candidates and shaping electoral outcomes. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 194-211.
31.
DrewE. (2015). The Republicans: Divided & scary. New York Review of Books, 62(3), 32-35.
32.
ElderL. (2014, August). Women and the parties: An analysis of Republican and Democratic strategies for recruiting women candidates. Paper presented at 2014 Annual American Political Science Association Meeting, Washington, DC.
33.
FiorinaM. P.AbramsS. J.PopeJ. C. (2006). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. New York, NY: Pearson.
34.
FoxR. L.LawlessJ. L. (2004). Entering the arena? Gender and the decision to run for office. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 264-280.
35.
FoxR. L.LawlessJ. L. (2010). If only they’d ask: Gender, recruitment, and political ambition. Journal of Politics, 72, 310-326.
36.
FoxR. L.OxleyZ. M. (2003). Gender stereotyping in state executive elections: Candidate selection and success. Journal of Politics, 65, 833-850.
37.
FriedmanM. (1993). Why government is the problem. Stanford, CA: Hoover Press.
38.
GallagherM.MarshM. (Eds.). (1988). Candidate selection in comparative perspective: The secret garden of politics. London, England: Sage.
39.
GreenhouseS. (2013, January23). Share of the work force in a union falls to a 97-year low, 11.3%. The New York Times, p. B1.
40.
GriffinJ. D.Anewalt-RemsburgC. (2013). Legislator wealth and the effort to repeal the estate tax. American Politics Research, 41, 599-622. doi: 10.1177/1532673X12472363
41.
GrofmanB. (1992). Public choice, civic republicanism, and American politics: Perspectives of a reasonable choice modeler. Texas Law Review, 71, 1541-1587.
42.
HazanR. Y.RahatG. (2010). Democracy within parties: Candidate selection methods and their political consequences. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
43.
HeaneyM. T.NewmanM. E.SylvesterD. E. (2010). Campaigning in the Internet age. In CraigS. C. (Ed.), The electoral challenge: Theory meets practice (pp. 165-188). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
44.
HerrnsonP. S. (1986). Do parties make a difference? The role of party organizations in congressional elections. Journal of Politics, 48, 589-615.
45.
HerrnsonP. S. (2009). The roles of party organizations, party-connected committees, and party allies in elections. Journal of Politics, 71, 1207-1224. doi:10.1017/S0022381609990065
46.
HerrnsonP. S.Stokes-BrownA. K.HindmanM. (2007). Campaign politics and the digital divide constituency characteristics, strategic considerations, and candidate internet use in state legislative elections. Political Research Quarterly, 60, 31-42.
47.
HuckshornR. J.BibbyJ. F. (1983). National party rules and delegate selection in the Republican Party. PS: Political Science & Politics, 16, 656-666.
IyengarS.WestwoodS. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 690-707.
50.
JacobsonG. C. (2015). It’s nothing personal: The decline of the incumbency advantage in US House elections. Journal of Politics, 77, 861-873.
51.
JenkinsS. (2007). A woman’s work is never done? Fund-raising perception and effort among female state legislative candidates. Political Research Quarterly, 60, 230-239.
52.
KaufmannK. M.GimpelJ. G.HoffmanA. H. (2003). A promise fulfilled? Open primaries and representation. Journal of Politics, 65, 457-476.
53.
KitscheltH. P. (1986). Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16, 57-85.
54.
KuninM. (2008). Pearls, politics, & power: How women can win and lead. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
55.
LawlessJ. L.FoxR. L. (2005). It takes a candidate: Why women don’t run for office. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
LessemR.UrbanC. (2015). Local economic gains from primary election spending. Economic Journal. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/ecoj.12296
58.
Lewis-BeckM. S.SquireP. (1995). The politics of institutional choice: Presidential ballot access for third parties in the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 25, 419-427.
59.
LundellK. (2004). Determinants of candidate selection the degree of centralization in comparative perspective. Party Politics, 10, 25-47.
60.
LuoM. (2008, February20). Small online contributions add up to huge fund-raising edge for Obama. The New York Times, p. A18.
61.
MansbridgeJ. (2015). Should workers represent workers?Swiss Political Science Review, 21, 261-270. doi:10.1111/spsr.12160
62.
MasketS. (2009). No middle ground: How informal party organizations control nominations and polarize legislatures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
RahatG. (2007). Candidate selection: The choice before the choice. Journal of Democracy, 18, 157-170.
77.
RahatG.HazanR. Y.KatzR. S. (2008). Democracy and political parties: On the uneasy relationships between participation, competition and representation. Party Politics, 14, 663-683. doi:10.1177/1354068808093405
78.
RidoutT. N.RottinghausB. (2008). The importance of being early: Presidential primary front-loading and the impact of the proposed western regional primary. PS: Political Science & Politics, 41, 123-128.
RosenstoneS. J.RoyL.BehrR. L.LazarusE. H. (1984). Third parties in America: Citizen response to major party failure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
81.
RosenthalL.TrostC. (2012). Steep: The precipitous rise of the Tea Party. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
SanbonmatsuK.CarrollS. J.WalshD. (2009). Poised to run: Women’s pathways to the state legislatures. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics.
84.
SantanaA.CollerX.AguilarS. (2015). Las parlamentarias regionales en España: masa crítica, experiencia parlamentaria e influencia política [Regional parliaments in Spain: critical mass, parliamentary experience and political influence]. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 149, 109-128.
85.
SchwartzM. A. (2010). Interactions between social movements and US political parties. Party Politics, 16, 587-607.
86.
SkocpolT.WilliamsonV. (2012). The Tea Party and the remaking of Republican conservatism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
87.
SpiesD. C.KaiserA. (2014). Does the mode of candidate selection affect the representativeness of parties?Party Politics, 20, 579-590.
88.
SquireP.MoncriefG. (2015). State legislatures today: Politics under the domes. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
89.
StegerW. P. (2000). Do primary voters draw from a stacked deck? Presidential nominations in an era of candidate-centered campaigns. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 30, 727-753.
90.
StratmannT. (2005). Some talk: Money in politics. A (partial) review of the literature. Public Choice, 124, 135-156.
91.
UhlanerC. J.SchlozmanK. L. (1986). Candidate gender and congressional campaign receipts. Journal of Politics, 48, 30-50.
92.
VaccariC. (2012). From echo chamber to persuasive device? Rethinking the role of the Internet in campaigns. New Media & Society, 15, 109-127.
WhiteleyP. F. (2011). Is the party over? The decline of party activism and membership across the democratic world. Party Politics, 17, 21-44.
95.
WilliamsC. B.GulatiG. J. (2012). Social networks in political campaigns: Facebook and the congressional elections of 2006 and 2008. New Media & Society, 15, 52-71.
96.
WilliamsC. B.GulatiJ.DeLeoR. (2013, August-September). The dissemination of social media to campaigns for state legislature: The 2012 New England Case. Paper presented at the 2013 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
