BermúdezS.CorderoG. (2014). Who is recruiting our crew? Contextual determinants of MPs’ selection. Unpublished manuscript, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
2.
BilleL. (2001). Democratizing a democratic procedure: Myth or reality? Candidate selection in Western European parties, 1960-1990. Party Politics, 7, 363-380.
3.
BowlerS.FarrellD. M.KatzR. S. (1999). Party discipline and parliamentary government. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
4.
CareyJ. M. (2007). Competing principals, political institutions, and party unity in legislative voting. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 92-107.
5.
CareyJ. M.Polga-HecimovichJ. (2006). Primary elections and candidate strength in Latin America. Journal of Politics, 68, 530-543.
6.
CorderoG.CollerX. (2015). Candidate selection and party discipline. Parliamentary Affairs, 68, 592-615.
7.
CoxG. (1999). Electoral rules and electoral coordination. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 145-161.
8.
CrossW. P.BlaisA. (2012). Politics at the centre. The selection and removal of party leaders in the Anglo parliamentary democracies. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
9.
CzudnowskiM. M. (1975). Political recruitment. In GreensteinF. I.PolsbyN. W. (Eds.), Handbook of political science (Vol. 2, pp. 155-242). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10.
DaltonR.FarrellD.McAllisterI. (2011). Political parties and democratic linkage: How parties organize democracy. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
11.
De WinterL. (1988). Belgium: Democracy or oligarchy? In GallagherM.MarshM. (Eds.), Candidate selection in comparative perspective: The secret garden of politics (pp. 20-46). London, England: Sage.
12.
DetterbeckK. (2013). The rare event of choice: Party primaries in German land parties. German Politics, 22, 270-287.
13.
FieldB.SiavelisP. M. (2008). Candidate selection procedures in transitional polities: A research note. Party Politics, 14, 620-639.
14.
FujimuraN. (2012). Electoral incentives, party discipline, and legislative organization: Manipulating legislative committees to win elections and maintain party unity. European Political Science Review, 4, 147-175.
15.
GallagherM.LaverM.MariP. (2001). Representative government in modern Europe. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
16.
GallagherM.MarshM. (1988). Candidate selection in comparative perspective: The secret garden of politics. London, England: Sage.
17.
HazanR. Y.RahatG. (2006). Candidate selection: Methods and consequences. In KatzR. S.CrottyW. J. (Eds.), Handbook of party politics (pp. 109-121). London, England: Sage.
18.
HermensF. A. (1972). Democracy or anarchy? A study of proportional representation. New York, NY: Johnson Reprint.
19.
HopkinJ. (2001). Bringing the members back in? Democratizing candidate selection in Britain and Spain. Party Politics, 7, 343-361.
20.
HopkinJ. (2003). Political decentralization, electoral change and party organizational adaptation. A framework for analysis. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10, 227-237.
21.
KatzR. S. (2001). The problem of candidate selection and models of party democracy. Party Politics, 7, 277-296.
22.
MichelsR. (1915). Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. New York, NY: Dover.
23.
MorlinoL. (1995). Consolidation and party government in Southern Europe. International Political Science Review, 16, 145-167.
24.
NorrisP.LovenduskiJ. (1995). Political recruitment: Gender, race and class in the British parliament. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
25.
PiletJ. B.CrossW. (2014). The selection of political party leaders in contemporary parliamentary democracies: A comparative study. London, England: Routledge.
26.
RahatG.HazanR. Y. (2001). Candidate selection methods: An analytical framework. Party Politics, 7, 297-322.
27.
RahatG.HazanR. Y. (2010). Democracy within parties: Candidate selection methods and their political consequences. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
28.
RanneyA. (1981). Candidate selection. In ButlerD.HowardR. P.AustinR. (Eds.), Democracy at the polls: A comparative study of competitive national elections (pp. 75-106). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
29.
ShomerY. (2014). What affects candidate selection processes? A cross-national examination. Party Politics, 20, 533-546.
30.
van HoutenP. (2009). Multi-level relations in political parties. A delegation approach. Party Politics, 15, 137-156.