These articles examine social networks in the context of Asia. Their pages contain numerous examples showcasing the primacy of social context in the patterning, accumulation, role, and value of social networks and social capital. Network characteristics follow from national and institutional characteristics: In China, kinship networks are prominent all throughout the life course. Meanwhile, guanxi continues to be an important factor in the labor market and academic success of Chinese individuals, despite the shift from socialism to capitalism. In Japan, mutual monitoring among kin and coworkers make for a society based on strong ties. In Korea, voluntary associations are important communal spaces for meeting diverse contacts. In China’s neighborhoods, cooperation between neighbors coexists with social control from above to reinforce social hierarchy. The issue ends with a note about the importance of cultivating guanxi in organizations and in everyday life.
AcharyaA. (2013). Asia is not one. In DuaraP. (Ed.), Asia redux: Conceptualizing a region for our times (pp. 52-68). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
2.
BentonR.McDonaldS.ManzoniA.WarnerD. (2014). The recruitment paradox: Network recruitment, structural position, and East German market transition. Social Forces, 93, 905-932. doi:10.1093/sf/sou100
3.
BianY. (1997). Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. American Sociological Review, 62, 366-385.
4.
BianY.HuangX.ZhangL. (2015). Information and favoritism: The network effect on wage income in China. Social Networks, 40, 129-138.
5.
BuekelK.GusevaA. (2002). What do you know, who do you know? School as a site for the production of social capital and its effects on income attainment in Poland and the Czech Republic. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 61, 657-680.
6.
ChenW.ReeseS. (Eds.). (2015). Networked China: Global dynamics, digital media and civic engagement. London, England: Routledge.
7.
ChuaV. (2011). Social networks and labour market outcomes in a meritocracy. Social Networks, 33, 1-11.
8.
ChuaV. (2014). Institutional comparisons of the perceived value of networks in China and the United States. Comparative Sociology, 13, 587-617.
9.
CurtisJ.BaerD.GrabbE. (2001). Nations of joiners: Explaining voluntary association membership in democratic societies. American Sociological Review, 66, 783-805.
10.
DoreR. (1986). Flexible rigidities: Industrial policy and structural adjustment in the Japanese economy, 1970-80. London, England: Athlone Press.
11.
DuaraP. (2013). Asia redux: Conceptualizing a region for our times. In DuaraP. (Ed.), Asia redux: Conceptualizing a region for our times (pp. 5-32). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
12.
EricksonB. (2001). Good networks and good jobs: The value of social capital to employers and employees. In LinN.BurtR.CookK. (Eds.), Social capital (pp. 127-158). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
13.
FreemanL. (2004). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Vancouver, Canada: Empirical Press.
14.
FreemanL.RuanD. (1997). An international comparative study of interpersonal behavior and role relationships. L’Année Sociologique, 47, 89-115.
15.
GiridharadasA. (2011). India calling: An intimate portrait of a nation’s remaking. New York, NY: Times Books.
16.
GranovetterM. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
17.
GranovetterM. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201-233.
18.
GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action, social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 1420-1443.
19.
GranovetterM. (1995). Getting a job. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
HallP.SoskiceD. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
21.
HuangX. (2008). Guanxi networks and job searches in China’s emerging labour market: A qualitative investigation. Work, Employment and Society, 22, 467-484.
22.
KohliA. (1989). Politics of economic liberalization in India. World Development, 17, 305-328.
23.
LaiG.WongO.FengX. (2015). Family, school, and access to social capital among high school students in urban Nanjing. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(8), 946-960. doi:10.1177/0002764215580589
24.
LedenevaA. (2008). Blat and guanxi: Informal practices in Russia and China. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 50, 118-144.
25.
LinN. (2000). Inequality in social capital. Contemporary Sociology, 29, 785-795.
26.
LinN. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
27.
MahbubaniK. (2008). The new Asian hemisphere: The irresistible shift of global power to the East. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
28.
McDonaldS. (2015). Network effects across the earnings distribution: Payoffs to visible and invisible job finding assistance. Social Science Research, 49, 299-313.
29.
MouwT. (2003). Social capital and finding a job: Do contacts matter?American Sociological Review, 68, 868-898.
30.
PutnamR. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
31.
RainieL.WellmanB. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
32.
ShirahaseS. (2014). Social inequality in Japan. London, England: Routledge.
33.
SmallM. (2009). Unanticipated gains: Origins of network inequality in everyday life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34.
SonJ. (2013). Social capital and institutional constraints: A comparative analysis of China, Taiwan and the US. London, England: Routledge.
35.
WellmanB. (1988). Structural analysis: From method to metaphor to theory and substance. In WellmanB.BerkowitzS. D. (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach (pp. 19-61). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
36.
WellmanB.ChenW.DongW. (2002). Networking guanxi. In GoldT.GuthrieD.WankD. (Eds.), Social connections in China (pp. 221-242). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
37.
YamagishiT. (1986). The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 110-116.
