We study a multidisciplinary, geographically dispersed, and multi-institutional research network that shows the complex relationships in collaborative research. Although collaborative work ties declined, the number of friendship and advice ties stayed stable and acquaintanceship ties grew. Most researchers seem satisfied with the network and relish the opportunities for cross-disciplinary exchanges. The benefits of the network do not lie in the traditional academic output of publications and artifacts, but in intellectual exchanges, knowledge transfer, fostering long-term ties within and across disciplines and universities, and the development of a collaborative culture.
BirnholtzJ. (2007). When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of collaboration propensity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 2226-2239.
2.
BreigerR. (1974). The duality of persons and groups. Social Forces, 53, 181-190.
3.
CummingsJ. N.KieslerS. (2005). Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 35, 703-722.
4.
CummingsJ. N.KieslerS. (2007). Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. Research Policy, 36, 1620-1634.
5.
DimitrovaD.KokuE. (2010). Managing collaborative research networks: The dual life of a virtual community of practice. International Journal of Virtual Communities and Social Networking, 2(4), 1-23.
6.
DimitrovaD.WellmanB.GruzdA.HayatI.MoG. Y.MokD.ZhuoX. (2013). NAVEL gazing: Studying a networked scholarly organization. In KranakisE. (Ed.), Advances in network analysis and its applications: Mathematics in industry (Vol. 18, pp. 287-313). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
7.
GuimeraR.UzziB.SpiroJ.AmaralL. A. N. (2005). Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science, 308, 697-702.
8.
HayatI. (2014). Structure, evolution and outcomes of research collaboration networks: The case of GRAND (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
9.
HayatT.MoG. Y. (2015). Advice giving and receiving within a research network. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(5), 582-598. doi:10.1177/0002764214556802
10.
HaythornthwaiteC.LunsfordK. J.BowkerG. C.BruceB. C. (2006). Challenges for research and practice in distributed, interdisciplinary collaboration. In HineC. (Ed.), New infrastructures for knowledge production: Understanding e-science (pp. 143-166). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Retrieved from http://people.lis.illinois.edu/~chip/pubs/05challenges.pdf
11.
LeeS.BozemanB. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35, 673-702.
12.
LungeanuA.ContractorN. S. (2015). The effects of diversity and network ties on innovations: The emergence of a new scientific field. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(5), 531-547. doi:10.1177/0002764214556804
13.
MoG. Y. (2014, May). Does diversity produce innovation?Paper presented at the International Communication Association, Seattle, WA.
14.
MoG. Y.HayatI. (2015). How far can scholarly networks go? Examining the relationships between distance, disciplines, motivations, and clusters. In RobinsonL.CottenS. R.SchulzJ. (Eds.), Studies in media and communication. Bingley, England: Emerald.
15.
MoG. Y.WellmanB. (2012). Understanding sequencing in social network communication. Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique, 114, 76-87.
16.
MokD.DimitrovaD.WellmanB. (2015). Is networked research the good life for scholars? In WangH. (Ed.), Communication and “The Good Life.”Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
OlsonG.OlsonJ. (2003). Mitigating the effects of distance on collaborative intellectual work. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(1), 27-42.
19.
OlsonJ. S.HoferE. C.BosN.ZimmermanA.OlsonG. M.CooneyD.FanielI. (2008). A theory of remote scientifgic collaboration. In OlsonG. M.ZimmermanA.BosN. (Eds.), Scientific collaboration on the Internet (pp. 73-87). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
SkrondalA.Rabe-HeskethS. (2003). Multilevel logistic regression for polytomous data and rankings. Psychometrika, 68, 267-287.
22.
WellmanB.DimitrovaD.HayatI.MoG. Y.SmaleL. (2014). Networking scholars in a networked organization. In BrassD. (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on organizational social networks: Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 40, pp. 475-493). Bingley, England: Emerald.
