Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals was enacted in August 2012, allowing undocumented youth who meet eligibility criteria to live and work in the United States for a period of 2 years. In April 2013, the Governor of Colorado signed the Advancing Students for a Stronger Economy Tomorrow bill granting undocumented students reduced tuition in the state’s public universities. In the absence of comprehensive immigration reform, this article addresses how legal reforms affect undocumented Latina/o youth in the context of a shifting political landscape in Colorado. Specifically, I address how these reforms affect immigrant youths’ access to higher education and employment opportunities. Data from qualitative interviews with 18 Latina/o undocumented youth ages 16 to 25 show that, while immigration reforms have created some opportunities, the policies’ limitations leave immigrant youth in “holding patterns” that delay or impede their access to higher education and, consequently, upward mobility. I also shed light on their perceptions of these reforms.
AbregoL. (2006). “I can’t go to college because I don’t have papers”: Incorporation patterns of Latino undocumented youth. Latino Studies, 4, 212-231.
2.
AbregoL. (2008). Legitimacy, social identity, and the mobilization of law: The effects of Assembly Bill 540 on undocumented students in California. Law & Social Inquiry, 33, 709-734.
3.
AbregoL.GonzalesR. (2010). Blocked paths, uncertain futures: The postsecondary education and labor market prospects of undocumented youth. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 15, 144-157.
4.
CalavitaK. (2005). Law, citizenship, and the construction of (some) immigrant “others.”Law & Social Inquiry, 30, 401-420.
5.
CastañedaH.MeloM. A. (2014). Health care access for Latino mixed-status families: Barriers, strategies, and implications for reform. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(14), 1891-1909. doi:10.1177/0002764214550290
6.
ChavezL. (2008). The Latino threat: Constructing immigrants, citizens, and the nation. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
ContrerasF. (2009). Sin papeles y rompiendo barreras: Latino students and the challenges of persisting in college. Harvard Educational Review, 79, 610-632.
9.
CrosnoeR.TurleyR. N. (2011). The K-12 educational outcomes of immigrant youth. Future of Children, 21, 129-152.
10.
FixM.ZimmermanW. (1999). All under one roof: Mixed status families in an era of reform. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/409100.pdf
Flores-GonzálezN.ArandaE.VaqueraE. (2014). “Doing race”: Latino youth’s identities and the politics of racial exclusion. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(14), 1834-1852. doi:10.1177/0002764214550287
13.
GandaraP.ContrerasF. (2009). The Latino education crisis: The consequences of failed social policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
GleesonS.GonzalesR. (2012). When do papers matter? An institutional analysis of undocumented life in the United States. International Migration, 50, 1-19.
15.
GonzalesR. (2010). On the wrong side of the tracks: The consequences of school stratification systems for unauthorized Mexican students. Peabody Journal of Education, 85, 469-485.
16.
GonzalesR. (2011). Learning to be illegal: Undocumented youth and shifting legal contexts in the transition to adulthood. American Sociological Review, 76, 602-619.
17.
GonzalesR.ChavezL. (2012). Awakening to a nightmare: Abjectivity and illegality in the lives of undocumented 1.5 generation Latino immigrants in the United States. Current Anthropology, 53, 255-281.
18.
GonzalesR.TerriquezV. (2013). How DACA is impacting the lives of those now DACAmented: Preliminary findings from the National UnDACAmented Research Project. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute and the Center for the Study of Immigrant Integration.
19.
GonzalesR. G.TerriquezV.RuszczykS. P. (2014). Becoming DACAmented: Assessing the short-term benefits of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). American Behavioral Scientist, 58(14), 1852-1872. doi:10.1177/0002764214550288
20.
GreenmanE.HallM. (2013). Legal status and educational transitions for Mexican and Central American immigrant youth. Social Forces, 91, 1475-1498.
21.
HallerW.PortesA.LynchS. M. (2011). Dreams fulfilled, dreams shattered: Determinants of segmented assimilation in the second generation. Social Forces, 89, 733-762.
JohnsonK. R. (1996). Aliens and the U.S. immigration laws: The social and legal construction of nonpersons. University of Miami International Law Review, 28, 263-292.
24.
KasinitzP.MollenkopfJ.WatersM.HoldawayJ. (2008). Inheriting the city: The children of immigrants come of age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press and Russell Sage Foundation.
25.
MenjívarC. (2006a). Educational hopes, documented dreams: Guatemalan and Salvadoran immigrants’ legality and educational prospects. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 620, 177-193.
26.
MenjívarC. (2006b). Liminal legality: Salvadoran and Guatemalan immigrants’ lives in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 999-1037.
27.
MenjívarC.AbregoL. (2009). Parents and children across borders: Legal instability and intergenerational relations in Guatemalan and Salvadoran families. In FonerN. (Ed.), Across generations: Immigrant families in America (pp. 160-189). New York: New York University Press.
28.
Migration Policy Institute. (2013). Colorado: Social and demographic characteristics. Washington, DC.
29.
OlivasMichael. 2012. No undocumented child left hehind: Plyler v. Doe and the education of undocumented schoolchildren. NYU Press.
30.
PortesA.MacLeodD. (1999). Educating the second generation: Determinants of academic achievement among children of immigrants in the United States. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 25, 373-396.
31.
PortesA.RumbautR. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
32.
PortesA.StepickA. (1993). City on the edge: The transformation of Miami. Berkeley, CA: UC Press.
33.
PortesA.ZhouM. (1993). The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 530, 74-96.
Szkupinski QuirogaS.MedinaD. M.GlickJ. (2014). In the belly of the beast: Effects of anti-immigration policy on Latino community members. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(13), 1723-1742. doi:10.1177/0002764214537270
37.
TellesE.OrtizV. (2009). Generations of exclusion: Mexican Americans, assimilation, and race. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
38.
TiendaM.HaskinsR. (2011). Immigrant children: Introducing the issue. Future of Children, 21, 3-18.
WatersM. (1997). Immigrant families at risk: Factors that undermine chances for success. In BoothA. (Ed.), Immigration and the family: Research and policy on U.S. immigrants (pp. 65-84). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
WatersM.JimenezT. (2005). Assessing immigrant assimilation: New empirical and theoretical challenges. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 105-125.
43.
WatersM.TranV.KasinitzP.MollenkopfJ. (2010). Segmented assimilation revisited: Types of acculturation and socioeconomic mobility in young adulthood. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33, 1168-1193.
44.
ZhouM. (1999). Segmented assimilation: Issues, controversies, and recent research on the new second generation. In HirschmanC.KasinitzP.DeWindJ. (Eds.), The handbook of international migration (pp. 196-211). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
