This study examines the “Twitter election of 2012,” and specifically young citizens’ “social watching” behaviors while live-tweeting a 2012 nationally televised Republican primary debate. We find several important relationships between key demographic, social, and political engagement variables and participants’ social watching activity (frequency of tweeting while watching the debate). We also find important links between tweet content (frequency of candidate mentions in tweets) and debate viewers’ candidate evaluations.
AnsteadN.O’LoughlinB. (2011). The emerging viewertariat and BBC question time. International Journal of Press/Politics, 16, 440-462. doi:10.1177/1940161211415519
2.
AsurS.HubermanB. A. (2010). Predicting the future with social media (Tech. rep.). Palo Alto, CA: HP Labs.
3.
BrennerJ. (2013, February14). Pew Internet: Social networking (full detail). Retrieved from www.pewinternet.org
GoodaleG. (2012, January6). Why Ron Paul, graybeard of GOP race, lights up the youth vote. Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved from http://www.csmonitor.com
8.
GOP Candidates to Appear in Last Debate Before Florida Primary. (2012, January25). CNN.com Blog. Retrieved from cnnpressroom.blogs.com
HawthorneJ.WarnerB. R. (2013). Winning on Facebook and Twitter: The influence of social media on candidate evaluations in the 2012 election. Manuscript under review.
11.
HoustonJ. B.HawthorneJ.McKinneyM. S. (2012, November). Political arguments in 140 characters or less: Tweeting a Republican presidential primary debate. Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Communication Association, Orlando, FL.
12.
KaidL. L.McKinneyM. S.TedescoJ. C. (2007). Political information efficacy and young voters. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1093-1111. doi:10.1177/0002764207300040
13.
KushinM. J.YamamotoM. (2010). Did social media really matter? College students’ use of online media and political decision making in the 2008 election. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 608-630. doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.516863
LemertJ. B.ElliottW. R.NestvoldK. J.RarickG. R. (1983). Effects of viewing a presidential primary debate: An experiment. Communication Research, 10, 155-173.
16.
LotanG.GraeffE.AnannyM.GaffneyD.PearceI.boydd. (2011). The revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1375-1405. doi:1932-8036/2011FEA1375
17.
McKinneyM. S.BanwartM. C. (2011). The election of a lifetime. In McKinneyM. S.BanwartM. C. (Eds.), Communication in the 2008 U.S. election: Digital natives elect a president (pp. 1-9). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
18.
McKinneyM. S.CarlinD. B. (2004). Political campaign debates. In KaidL. L. (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 203-234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
McKinneyM. S.ChattopadhyayS. (2007). Political engagement through debates: Young citizens’ reactions to the 2004 presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1169-1182. doi:10.1177/0002764207300050
20.
McKinneyM. S.HoustonJ. B. (2012, May). Leader of the pack: The emergence of a presidential nominee through primary debates. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Communication Association, Phoenix, AZ.
21.
McKinneyM. S.HoustonJ. B.HawthorneJ. (2012, August). Live-tweeting the presidential debates: Using social media to process political campaign communication. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Chicago, IL.
22.
McKinneyM. S.RillL. A. (2009). Not your parents’ presidential debates: Examining the effects of the CNN/YouTube debates on young citizens’ civic engagement. Communication Studies, 60, 392-406. doi:10.1080/10510970903110001
23.
McKinneyM. S.RillL. A.GullyD. (2011). Civic engagement through presidential debates: Young citizens’ attitudes of political engagement throughout the 2008 election. In McKinneyM. S.BanwartM. C. (Eds.), Communication in the 2008 U.S. election: Digital natives elect a president (pp. 1-9). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
24.
A New Barometer for the Election. (2012, August1). Twitter Blog. Retrieved from blog.twitter.com
25.
Pew Research Center. (2013, March4). Twitter reaction to events often at odds with overall public opinion. Retrieved from www.pewresearch.org
26.
RahimiB. (2011). The agonistic social media: Cyberspace in the formation of dissent and consolidation of state power in postelection Iran. Communication Review, 14, 158-178. doi:10.1080/10714421.2011.597240
27.
RanieL.SmithA.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH.VerbaS. (2012). Social media and political engagement. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
28.
RosenstoneS. J.KinderD. R.MillerW. E., & the National Election Studies. (1997). American National Election Study 1996: Pre- and post-election survey [Computer file]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies (Producer) and Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (Distributor).
ShammaD. A.KennedyL.ChurchillE. F. (2009). Tweet the debates: Understanding community annotation of uncollected sources. In Proceedings of the first SIGMM workshop on social media (pp. 3-10). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/1631144.1631148
31.
SmithA.BoylesJ. L. (2012). The rise of the “connected viewer.”Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
32.
StelterB. (2012, January15). Fox and Twitter join forces for Republican debate. NYTimes.com Blog. Retrieved from www.mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com
33.
SummersJ. (2011, July19). Twitter presidential debate set for Wednesday. Retrieved from www.politico.com
ThorsonE.HawthorneJ.SwasyA.McKinneyM. S. (2013). The effects of “social watching” the 2012 presidential debates. Manuscript submitted for publication.
36.
TrippiJ. (2004). The revolution will not be televised: Democracy, the Internet and the overthrow of everything. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
37.
TufekciZ.WilsonC. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62, 363-379. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x
38.
TumasjanA.SprengerT. O.SandnerP. G.WelpeI. M. (2011). Election forecasts with Twitter: How 140 characters reflect the political landscape. Social Science Computer Review, 29, 402-418. doi:10.1177/0894439310386557
39.
ValenzuelaS.ArriagadaA.SchermanA. (2012). The social media basis of youth protest behavior: The case of Chile. Journal of Communication, 62, 299-314. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01635.x
40.
VitakJ.ZubeP.SmockA.CarrC. T.EllisonN.LampeC. (2011). It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 14, 107-114. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0226
41.
WarnerB. R.HawthorneJ.Turner-McGowenS. (2012, November). Social media and political participation among younger Americans. Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Communication Association, Orlando, FL.
42.
WarnerB. R.Turner-McGowenS.HawthorneJ. (2012). Limbaugh’s social media nightmare: Facebook and Twitter as a space for political action. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 19, 257-275. doi:10.1080/19376529.2012.722479
43.
WhillockR. K. (1997). Cyber-politics: The online strategies of ’96. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 1208-1225.
44.
YawnM.EllsworthK.BeattyB.KahnK. F. (1998). How a presidential primary debate changed attitudes of audience members. Political Behavior, 20, 155-181.