The Professionalization of Political Communication? A Longitudinal Analysis of Dutch Election Campaign Posters

Abstract

This article provides an analysis of Dutch election posters in the period from 1946 to 2006. Based on the literature on the professionalization of political communication, several hypotheses are formulated regarding changes in textual and visual elements of those posters. These hypotheses focus on over-time changes in the presence and prominence of the party leader and party logo’s as well as references to specific political issues and ideology in these posters. In total, 225 posters for 23 parties in 19 elections are analyzed. Results reveal that changes in visual elements are in line with the hypotheses, with an increased use of party logo, an increasing presence and prominence of the party leader, and a decreasing focus on ideology. The textual parts of the posters, however, show no or opposite trends. The results call for a more nuanced scientific treatment of the consequences of the professionalization of political communication and demonstrate the necessity to analyze both visual and textual elements of political parties’ communication.

Keywords

election media Netherlands campaign posters political parties

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andeweg

R. B.

Irwin

G. A.

(2005). Governance and Politics of the Netherlands (2nd ed.). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Blumler

J. G.

Gurevitch

(1995). The crisis of public communication. London: Routledge.

Blumler

J. G.

Kavanagh

(1999). The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication, 16, 209-230.

Brants

(1998). Who’s afraid of infotainment? European Journal of Communication, 13(3), 315-335.

Brants

van Praag

(2006). Signs of media logic. Half a century of political communication in the Netherlands. Javnost/The Public, 13(1), 25-40.

Cappella

J. N.

Jamieson

K. H.

(1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Dumitrescu

(2010). Know me, love me, fear me: The anatomy of candidate poster designs in the 2007 French legislative elections. Political Communication, 27(1), 20-43.

Elzinga

D. J.

Voerman

(2002). Om de stembus: verkiezingsaffiches 1918-1998. Amsterdam: Veen.

Esser

(2008). Dimensions of political news cultures: Sound bite and image bite news in France, Germany, Great Britain, and the United States. International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(4), 401-428.

10.

Esser

Reinemann

Fan

(2001). Spin doctors in the United States, Great Britain, and Germany. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 6(1), 16-45.

11.

Farrell

D. M.

Wortmann

(1987). Party strategies in the electoral market: Political marketing in West Germany, Britain and Ireland. European Journal of Political Research, 15(3), 297-318.

12.

Geer

J. G.

(1996). From tea leaves to opinion polls. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

13.

Goslinga

Ten Hooven

Lage

(2005, November 15). Echte vader van het affiche; ‘Ik wilde een typisch Hollandse foto maken’; zij van het Binnenhof. Trouw, p. 11.

14.

Grabe

M. E.

Bucy

E. P.

(2009). Image bite politics: News and visual framing of elections. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

15.

Hallin

D. C.

Mancini

(2004). Comparing media systems. Three models of media and politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Hayes

A. F.

Krippendorff

(2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77-89.

17.

Krouwel

(2003). Otto Kirchheimer and the catch-all party. West European Politics, 26(2), 23-40.

18.

Lijphart

(1968). The politics of accommodation: Pluralism and democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California Press.

19.

Lijphart

(1999). Patterns of democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

20.

Negrine

Lilleker

D. G.

(2002). The professionalization of political communication: Continuities and change in media practices. European Journal of Communication, 17(3), 305-323.

21.

Negrine

Papathanassopoulos

(1996). The “Americanization” of political communication. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 1(2), 45-62.

22.

Patterson

(1993). Out of order. New York, NY: Knopf.

23.

Rahat

Sheafer

(2007). The personalization(s) of politics: Israel, 1949-2003. Political Communication, 24(1), 65-80.

24.

Shoemaker

P. J.

Reese

S. D.

(1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content. London: Longman.

25.

Smith

Rainie

(2008). The Internet and the 2008 election. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.

26.

Van Zoonen

E. A.

(2005). Entertaining the citizen: When politics and popular culture converge. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.

27.

Vliegenthart

Boomgaarden

H. G.

Boumans

(2011). Changes in political news coverage: Personalization, conflict and negativity in British and Dutch newspapers. In Brants

Voltmer

(Eds.), Political communication in postmodern democracy (pp. 92-110). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

28.

Walter

A. S.

Vliegenthart

(2010). Negative campaigning across different communication channels: Different ball games? International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(4), 441-461.