In this article, the authors first demonstrate the applicability of a standard anchoring paradigm to situations where both the anchor and subsequent target are compound concepts (Study 1). They next show that systematically varying the target so that it is increasingly different from the anchor leads to diminishing anchoring effects (Study 2). Finally, they demonstrate that the degree to which the anchoring effect occurs as such targets vary from anchors depends on which concept of the compound is made to vary from its analogue in the anchor (Studies 2 and 3).
AdavalR.MonroeK. B. (2002). Automatic construction and use of contextual information for product and price evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 572-588.
2.
BlankenshipK. L.WegenerD. T.PettyR. E.Detweiler-BedellB.MacyC. L. (2008). Elaboration and consequences of anchored estimates: An attitudinal perspective on numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1465-1476.
3.
BristolT. (1996). Consumers’ beliefs resulting from conceptual combinations: Conjunctive inferences about brand extensions. Psychology and Marketing, 13(6), 571-589.
4.
ChapmanG. B.JohnsonE. J. (2002). Incorporating the irrelevant: Anchors in judgments of belief and value. In GilovichT.GriffinD.KahnemanD. (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 120-138). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
CollinsA. M.LoftusE. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407-428.
6.
EnglichB.MussweilerT. (2001). Sentencing under uncertainty: Anchoring effects in the courtroom. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1535-1551.
7.
EnglichB.MussweilerT.StrackF. (2006). Playing dice with criminal sentences: The influence of irrelevant anchors judicial decision-making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(2), 188-200.
8.
EpleyN.GilovichT. (2004). Are adjustments insufficient?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 447-460.
9.
EpleyN.GilovichT. (2005). When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring: Differential effects of forewarning and incentives on self-generated and externally provided anchors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 119-212.
10.
EtzioniA. (2011). Behavioral economics: Toward a new paradigm. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(8), 1099-1119.
11.
HamptonJ. A. (1997). Emergent attributes in conceptual combinations. In WardT.SmithS. M.ViadJ.Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 83-110). Washington, DC: American psychological Association.
12.
HastieR.SchroederC.WeberR. (1990). Creating complex social conjunction categories from simple categories. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28(3), 242-247.
13.
HutterR. R.CrispR. J. (2005). The composition of category conjunctions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(5), 647-657.
KundaZ.MillerD. T.ClaireT. (1990). Combining social concepts: The role of causal reasoning. Cognitive Science, 14(4), 551-577.
16.
MantelS. P.KardesF. R. (1999). The rule of direction of comparison, attribute-based processing, and attitude-based processing in consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(4), 335-352.
17.
MussweilerT. (2001). The durability of anchoring effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 431-442.
18.
MussweilerT. (2007). Assimilation and contrast as comparison effects: A selective accessibility model. In StapelD. A.SulsJ. (Eds.), Assimilation and contrast in social psychology (pp. 165-186). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
19.
MussweilerT.EnglichB. (2005). Subliminal anchoring: Judgmental consequences and underlying mechanisms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98, 133-143.
20.
MussweilerT.EnglichB.StrackF. (2004). Anchoring effect. In PohlR. (Ed.), Cognitive illusions: A handbook on fallacies and biases (pp. 183-200). London, UK: Psychology Press.
21.
MussweilerT.StrackF. (2001a). Considering the impossible: Explaining the effects of implausible anchors. Social Cognition, 19(2), 145-160.
22.
MussweilerT.StrackF. (2001b). The semantics of anchoring. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 234-255.
23.
NorthcraftG. B.NealeM. A. (1987). Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 84-97.
24.
NunesJ. C.BoatwrightP. (2004). Incidental prices and their effect on willingness to pay. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 457-466.
25.
OppenheimerD. M.LeBoeufR. A.BrewerN. T. (2008). Anchors away: A demonstration of cross-modality anchoring and magnitude priming. Cognition, 106, 13-26.
26.
RoschE.MervisC. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573-605.
27.
StrackF.MussweilerT. (1997). Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 437-446.
28.
TukeyJ. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
29.
TverskyA. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
30.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
31.
WedellD. H. (2007). Contrasting models of assimilation and contrast. In StapelD. A.SulsJ. (Eds.), Assimilation and contrast in social psychology (pp. 45-74). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
32.
WegenerD. T.PettyR. E.Detweiler-BedellB. T.JarvisW. B. (2001). Implications of attitude change theories for numerical anchoring: Anchor plausibility and the limits of anchor effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 62-69.
33.
WilkenfeldM. J.WardT. B. (2001). Similarity and emergence in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 21-38.
34.
WilsonT. D.HoustonC. E.EtlingK. M.BrekkeN. (1996). A new look at anchoring effects: Basic anchoring and its antecedents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125(4), 387-402.
35.
WisniewskiE. J. (1997). When concepts combine. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 167-183.
36.
WisniewskiE. J.LoveB. C. (1998). Relations versus properties in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 177-202.
37.
WongK. F.KwongJ. Y. (2000). Is 7300 m Equal to 7.3 km? Same semantics but different anchoring effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(2), 314-333.
