This article provides an overview and analysis of legal standards helping to shape the employment environment of non–tenure track faculty members. Familiarity with the significant differences in the types of employment arrangements for non–tenure track faculty and the resulting legal protections is of potential value to scholars seeking to better understand issues related to these faculty members. Many non–tenure track faculty members possess limited legal protections related to their employment, but a minority work under multiyear appointments with an expectation of renewal. The presence or absence of collective bargaining rights may also result in meaningful differences in the employment environment of non–tenure track faculty members. Additionally, the article examines the potential impact on non–tenure track faculty of legal uncertainty over First Amendment protection for individual academic freedom and other forms of professorial speech.
American Association of University Professors. (2009). Faculty handbooks as enforceable contracts: A state guide. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
American Federation of Teachers. (2009). American academic: The state of the higher education workforce 1997-2007. Washington, DC: Author.
4.
BaldwinR. G.ChronisterJ. L. (2001). Teaching without tenure: Policies and practices for a new era. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5.
Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972).
6.
Bradford College, 262 NLRB 565 (1982).
7.
Brown University, 342 NLRB 483 (2004).
8.
ByrneJ. P. (1989). Academic freedom: A “special concern of the First Amendment.”Yale Law Journal, 99, 251-340.
9.
ByrneJ. P. (2009). Neo-orthodoxy in academic freedom. Texas Law Review, 88, 143-170.
10.
FishmanJ. J. (2005). Tenure: Endangered or evolutionary species. Akron Law Review, 38, 771-787.
11.
Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006).
12.
Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003).
13.
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988).
14.
Hong v. Grant, 516 F.Supp. 2d 1158 (C.D. Cal. 2007).
15.
JaschikS. (2010a, April13). An invitation to unionize. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.Insidehighered.com
16.
JaschikS. (2010b, March2). Layoffs without “financial exigency.”Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.Insidehighered.com
17.
JorgensenJ. D.HelmsL. B. (2008). Academic freedom, the First Amendment and competing stakeholders: The dynamics of a changing balance. Review of Higher Education, 32(1), 1-24. doi: 10.1353/rhe.0.003610.1353/rhe.0.0036
18.
Kerr v. Hurd, No. 3:07-cv-297, 2010WL 890638 (S.D. Ohio March 15, 2010).
19.
Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 599 (1967).
20.
MoriartyJ.SavareseM. (2006). Directory of faculty contracts and bargaining agents in institutions of higher education. New York, NY: National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education and the Professions.
21.
MuhlC. J. (2001, January). The employment-at-will-doctrine: Three major exceptions. Monthly Labor Review, 124(1), 3-10.
RhoadesG.MaitlandC. (2006). More than they bargained for: Contingent faculty. In The NEA 2006 almanac of higher education (pp. 65-71). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
27.
Sadid v. Idaho State University, No. CV-2008-3942-OC (Idaho Dist. Ct. Dec. 18, 2009).
28.
St. Thomas University, 298 NLRB 280 (1990).
29.
SaltzmanG. M. (1998). Legal regulation of collective bargaining in colleges and universities. In The NEA 1998 almanac of higher education (pp. 45-63). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
30.
SaltzmanG. M. (2000). Union organizing and the law: Part-time faculty and graduate teaching assistants. In The NEA 2000 almanac of higher education (pp. 43-55). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
31.
ShaversF. L. (2000). Academic ranks and titles of full-time nontenure-track faculty. In TrowerC. A. (Ed.), Policies on faculty appointment: Standard practices and unusual arrangements (pp. 110-140). Bolton, MA: Anker.
SwiftK. R. (2010). The public policy exception to employment at-will: Time to retire a noble warrior?Mercer Law Review, 61, 551-584.
35.
TepperR. J.WhiteC. G. (2009). Speak no evil. Academic freedom and the application of Garcetti v. Ceballos to public university faculty. Catholic University Law Review, 59, 125-181.
36.
ThedwallK. (2008). Nontenure-track faculty: Rising numbers, lost opportunities. New Directions for Higher Education, 143, 11-19. doi: 10.1002/he.30810.1002/he.308
37.
TrumanC. (2009, September26). Order to eliminate tenure reversed. Lexington Herald. Retrieved from http://www.kentucky.com
38.
University of Great Falls, 325 NLRB 83 (1997).
39.
Urofsky v. Gilmore, 216 F.3d 401 (4th Cir. 2000).
40.
WarrenJ. (2009, March14). KCTCS to stop giving faculty tenure. Lexington Herald. Retrieved from http://www.kentucky.com
