Technological advances of the 21st century are changing how people get news and what they expect from it. How a message is presented—as straight, opinionated, collaborative, or blog news—affects its credibility. This experiment suggests that the strongest predictor of article and organizational credibility online is the author’s perceived expertise, but in today’s digital age, that expertise is largely determined by the level of coorientation between the sender and receiver.
Anderson, R., Dardenne, R., & Killenberg, G. (1994). The conversation of journalism: Communication, community, and news. Westport, CT: Prager.
2.
Anderson, R.B., & McMillion, P.Y. (1995). Effects of similar and diversified modeling on African-American women’s efficacy expectations and intentions to perform breast self-examination. Health Communication, 7, 327-343.
3.
Biocca, F., Burgoon, J., Harms, C., & Stoner, M. ( 2001, May). Criteria and scope conditions for a theory and measure of social presence. Paper presented at Presence , Philadelphia, PA.
4.
Brave, S., Nass, C. & Hutchinson, K. ( 2005) Computers that care: Investigating the effects of orientation of emotion exhibited by an embodied computer agent. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(2), 161-178.
5.
Carley, K.M. ( 1999). On the evolution of social and organizational networks .
6.
Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 16, 3-30.
7.
Clarke, P. ( 1973). Teenagers’ coorientation and information-seeking about pop music. American Behavioral Scientist, 16(4), 551-566.
8.
Gaziano, C., & McGrath, K. ( 1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63, 451-462.
9.
Gillmor, D. ( 2004). We the media: Grassroots journalism by the people, for the people. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
10.
Gunawardena, C.N. ( 1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2/3), 147-166.
11.
Gunawardena, C.N., & Zittle, F.J. ( 1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26.
12.
Hamman, B. ( 2006). Two voices: Social presence, participation, and credibility in online news (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Missouri-Columbia.
13.
Heider, F. ( 1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
14.
Hovland, C.I., Janis, I.L., & Kelley, H.H. ( 1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
Lee, K.M., & Nass C. ( 2005). Social-psychological origins of feelings of presence: Creating social presence with machine-generated voices. Media Psychology, 7(1), 31-45.
16.
McLeod, J.M., & Chaffee, S. ( 1973). Interpersonal approaches to communication research. American Behavioral Scientist, 16(4), 469-499.
17.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. ( 2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-44.
18.
Meyer, P. ( 1988). Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 567-588.
19.
Mindich, D.T.Z. ( 2005). Tuned out: Why Americans under 40 don’t follow the news.
20.
New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
Newhagen, J., & Nass, C. ( 1988). Differential criteria for evaluating credibility of newspapers and TV news. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 567-588.
22.
Perloff, R. ( 2003). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st century. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
Pew Center for the People and the Press. ( 2002). News media’s improved image proves short-lived . Retrieved from http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=159
24.
Project for Excellence in Journalism. (2007 ). State of the news media 2007. Retrieved from http://www.stateofthenewsmedia.org/2007/
25.
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. ( 1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Ryan, M. ( 1982). Impact of personal contact on sources’ views of the press. Newspaper Research Journal, 3(3), 22-29.
27.
Skoler, M. ( 2005). Fear, loathing and the promise of public insight journalism: A journalist wonders whether the mainstream news media will adapt fast enough to their changing relationship with the public to survive. Nieman Reports, 59(4), 19-21.
28.
Skoler, M. ( 2006, November). Public insight journalism and the "idea generator ."
29.
Lecture presented for the Hurley New Media/Enduring Values project, University of Columbia, Columbia, MO.
30.
Short, J., Williams, E. & Christie, B. ( 1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York, NY: Wiley.
31.
Swan, K. ( 2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education, Communication and Information , 2(1), 23-49.
32.
Tamborini, R., & Skalski, P. ( 2005). Vividness, social presence and persuasion: Reconsidering the influence of modality on attitude formation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association , New York, NY.
33.
Thorson, E., & Duffy, M. ( 2006). A needs-based theory of the revolution in news use and its implications for the newspaper business (Technical report). Columbia: University of Missouri-Columbia, Reynolds Journalism Institute at the School of Journalism.
34.
Wackman, D.B. ( 1973). Interpersonal communication and coorientation. American Behavioral Scientist, 16(4), 537-550.
