U.S. Policy and the STEM Workforce System

Abstract

This article describes the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce system and discusses various policy mechanisms that can influence it. Discussion of STEM workforce policy too often focuses on controlling single variables, such as degree production, without taking into account how it influences, and is influenced by, other variables in the system. As a result, policy outcomes frequently fall short of goals. The policy discussion can be improved by taking an approach that recognizes that the STEM workforce is a system, with interconnectedness, feedback loops, and adaptation. This article sketches elements of that system and how data can help us understand relationships among them and highlights gaps in our knowledge. It also describes some of the policy mechanisms used to affect the workforce system and suggests steps policy makers can take to improve policy outcomes.

Keywords

STEM workforce technology policy science policy systems dynamics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

America COMPETES Act, Pub. L. No. 110-69 (2007).

Anonymous. (2007, September 1). Are you an outsourced techie? Retrieved September 2, 2007, from http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/9/1/11330/77534

Blinder, A.S. ( 2007). How many U.S. jobs might be offshorable? (CEPS Working Paper 142). Princeton, NJ: Center for Economic Policy Studies.

Bracey, Gerald W. ( 2006, May 21). Heard the One About the 600,000 Chinese Engineers? Washington Post, p. B3.

Broder, D. ( 2006, March 19). For Gates, a visa charge. Washington Post, p. B7.

Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology. ( 2004a). Twenty years of scientific & technical employment . Washington, DC: Author.

Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology. ( 2004b). Women in science and technology: The Sisyphean challenge of change. Washington, DC: Author .

Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology. ( 2005). Sisyphus revisited: Participation by minorities in STEM occupations, 1994-2004. Washington, DC: Author.

Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology. ( 2006). Four decades of STEM degrees. Washington, DC: Author.

10.

Computing Research Association. (n.d.). Taulbee Survey. Retrieved June 6, 2008, fromhttp://www.cra.org/CRN/articles/may08/taulbee.html

11.

Eisenbrey, R. ( 2007, April 18). Subsidizing downward mobility: The problem with the Democrats’ proposed wage insurance program. American Prospect, Retrieved from http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=subsidizing_downward_mobility

12.

Ellis, R.A. ( 2007). Is U.S. science and technology adrift? Washington, DC: Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology.

13.

Gates, B. ( 2007, February 25). How to keep America competitive. Washington Post, p. B7.

14.

Hira, R. ( 2007). Outsourcing America’s technology & knowledge jobs. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute’s Agenda for Shared Prosperity.

15.

Jackson, S.A. ( 2003). Envisioning a 21st century science and engineering workforce for the United States: Tasks for university, industry, and government. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

16.

Lowell, B.L. ( 2005). The foreign born in science & technology. Washington, DC: Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology.

17.

McGee, M.K. ( 2008, April 26). Info tech salaries drop, our survey finds. What’s holding U.S. pay down? Retrieved August 30, 2008 , from http://www.informationweek.com/news/management/careers/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=207401820

18.

Office of Senator Lamar Alexander. (2007, August 9). Alexander praises law to protect American brainpower advantage . Retrieved June 6, 2008, from http://alexander.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressReleases.Detail&PressRelease_id=1238&Month=8&Year=2007

19.

Teitelbaum, Michael S. ( 2003, Fall). Do we need more scientists? The Public Interest, 153, 40-53.