This article explores the effects that a salient political center—periphery cleavage has on the structure (social networks) and outcomes (political attitudes) of social capital. The comparison of different regions within the same country supports the thesis that social capital is a reflection of the context in which it takes place. In this framework, social capital undermines equal representation of citizens’ identities. Second, political fragmentation is reproduced by the existence of more bonding than bridging social capital. Finally, it allows for the identification of scenarios in which involvement in informal social networks leads to both positive and negative consequences for citizens’ attitudes toward politics.
Aja, E. ( 2001). Spain: Nation, nationalities, and regions. In J. Loughling (Ed.), Subnational democracy in the European Union (pp. 229-253). New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Colomer, J.M. ( 1998). "State of autonomies": Non-institutional federalism. West European Politics, 21(4), 40-52.
3.
Díez Medrano, J. ( 1995). Divided nations: Class, politics and nationalism in the Basque Country and Catalonia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
4.
Fennema, M., & Tillie, J. ( 2005). Civic communities and multicultural democracy. In S. Roßteutscher (Ed.), Democracy and the role of association: Political, organizational and social contexts (pp. 219-236). London: Routledge .
5.
Fiorina, M.P. ( 1999). Extreme voice: A dark side of civic engagement. In T. Skocpol & M. P. Fiorina (Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 395-425). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
6.
Green, M.C., & Brock, T.C. ( 2005). Organizational membership versus informal interactions: Contributions to skills and perceptions that build social capital. Political Psychology, 26(1), 1-25.
7.
Gunther, R., Montero, J.R., & Botella, J. ( 2004). Democracy in modern Spain. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
Hooghe, M. ( 2007). Social capital and diversity. Generalized trust, social cohesion and regimes of diversity. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 709-732.
9.
Howard, M.M., & Gilbert, L. ( 2008). A cross-national comparison of the internal effects of participation in voluntary organizations. Political Studies , 56, 12-32.
10.
Huici, C., Ros, M., Cano, I., Hopkins, N., Emler, N., & Carmona, M. ( 1997). Comparative identity and evaluation of socio-political change: Perceptions of the European Community as a function of the saliency of regional identities. European Journal of Social Psychology , 27, 97-113.
11.
Kriesi, H., Morales, L., & Walter-Rogg, M. (2007). The political and cultural context of associational life. In W. A. Maloney & S. Roßteutscher (Eds.), Social capital and associations in European democracies. A comparative analysis (pp. 244-265). New York: Routledge.
12.
Lago Peñas, I. ( 2004). Cleavages and thresholds: The political consequences of electoral laws in the Spanish autonomous communities, 1980-2000. Electoral Studies, 23(1), 23-43.
13.
Linz, J.J., & Montero, J.R. ( 1999). The party systems of Spain: Old cleavages and new challenges (Working paper 138). Madrid: Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Ciencias Sociales.
14.
Medina, L. ( 2005). Confianza social y sociabilidad Social trust and sociability . In M. Torcal, L. Morales, & S. Pérez-Nievas (Eds.), España: Sociedad y política en perspectiva comparada (pp. 133-146). Valencia, Spain: Tirant lo Blanch.
15.
Montero, J. R., Font, J., & Torcal, M. (Eds.). (2006). Ciudadanos, asociaciones y participación en España Citizens, associations and participation in Spain. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas .
16.
Morales, L. ( 2005). Participación en asociaciones Involvement in associations . In M. Torcal, L. Morales, & S. Pérez-Nievas (Eds.), España: Sociedad y política en perspectiva comparada (pp. 235-257). Valencia, Spain: Tirant lo Blanch.
17.
Morales, L., & Mota, F. ( 2006). El asociacionismo en España. Associationism in Spain. In J. R. Montero, J. Font, & M. Torcal (Eds.), Ciudadanos, asociaciones y participación en España (pp. 77-104). Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
18.
Mota, F. ( 2002). El capital social de las autonomías: ¿Explica el capital social porqué unas comunidades autónomas funcionan mejor que otras? [Autonomous communities’ social capital: Does social capital explain why some autonomous communities perform better?]. In J. Subirats & R. Gallego (Eds.), Veinte años de autonomías en España: Leyes, políticas públicas, instituciones y opinión pública (pp. 293-321). Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
19.
Mutz, D.C. ( 2006). Hearing the other side. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Pallarés, F., & Keating, M. ( 2003). Multi-level electoral competition. Regional elections and party systems in Spain. European Urban and Regional Studies , 10(3), 239-255.
21.
Pallarés, F., Montero, J.R., & Llera, F.J. ( 1997). New state-wide parties in Spain: An attitudinal study of nationalism and regionalism. Publius: The Journal of Federalism , 27(4), 135-169.
22.
Paxton, P. ( 1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 105(1), 88-127.
23.
Paxton, P. ( 2002). Social capital and democracy: An interdependent relationship . American Sociological Review, 67(2), 254-277.
24.
Pérez-Agote, A. ( 1984). La reproducción del nacionalismo. El caso vasco [Nationalism reproduction. The Basque case]. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
25.
Pérez-Nievas, S. ( 2002). Modelo de partido y cambio político. El partido nacionalista vasco en el proceso de transición y consolidación democrática en el País Vasco [Party model and political change. The Basque Nationalist Party in the process of democratic transition and consolidation in the Basque Country]. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid e Instituto Juan March.
26.
Putnam, R.D. ( 2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community . New York: Simon & Schuster .
27.
Putnam, R.D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. ( 1993). Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Roßteutscher, S. ( 2002). Advocate or reflection? Associations and political culture . Political Studies, 50(3), 514-528.
29.
Roßteutscher, S. ( 2005). The lure of the associative elixir. In S. Roßteutscher (Ed.), Democracy and the role of associations: Political, organizational and social contexts (pp. 3-15). London : Routledge.
30.
Stolle, D., & Hooghe, M. ( 2005). Review article: Inaccurate, exceptional, one-sided or irrelevant? The debate about the alleged decline of social capital and civic engagement in western societies. British Journal of Political Science, 35, 149-167.
31.
Teorell, J., Sum, P., & Tobiasen, M. ( 2007). Participation and political equality: An assessment of large-scale democracy. In J. W. van Deth, J. R. Montero, & A. Westholm (Eds.), Citizenship and involvement in European democracies: A comparative analysis (pp. 384-414). New York: Routledge.
32.
Theiss-Morse, E., & Hibbing, J.R. ( 2005). Citizenship and civic engagement. Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 227-246.
33.
Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J., & King, G. ( 2003). CLARIFY. Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results (Version 2.1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University.
34.
Torcal, M., & Montero, J.R. ( 1999). Facets of social capital in new democracies: The formation and consequences of social capital in Spain. In J. W. van Deth, M. Maraffi, K. Newton, & P. Whiteley (Eds.), Social capital and European democracy (pp. 167-191). London: Routledge.
35.
van Deth, J.W. ( 2006). Democracy and involvement. The benevolent aspects of social participation. In M. Torcal & J. R. Montero (Eds.), Political disaffection in contemporary democracies. Social capital, institutions, and politics (pp. 101-129). London: Routledge.
36.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L., & Brady, H.E. ( 1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
Zmerli, S. ( 2002, August). The empirical relevance of bonding and bridging social capital: An East-West German comparison. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association , Boston.
38.
Zmerli, S. ( 2003). Applying the concept of bonding and bridging social capital to empirical political research. European Political Science , 2(3), 68-75.
39.
Zmerli, S., Newton, K., & Montero, J.R. ( 2007). Trust in people, confidence in political institutions, and satisfaction with democracy. In J. W. van Deth, J. R. Montero, & A. Westholm (Eds.), Citizenship and involvement in European democracies: A comparative analysis (pp. 35-65). London : Routledge.
