Critics have argued that the term social capital is too vague or general to be a useful concept. Recognizing the need for clarification, the authors distill the conceptual discussions about social capital to argue that there are three components_network structure, trust and reciprocity, and resources_that are associated with but vary in degree and salience for all forms of social capital. These three components should be considered continua along which the forms of social capital can vary. A fourth continuum is between micro and macro levels of social capital. Locating particular examples of social capital along these continua opens the possibility to compare different types of social capital and to develop and test theories about how they are related to each other. The authors also describe a simulation study to illustrate how simulation can facilitate understanding of the linkages among different forms of social capital.
Adler, P.S., & Kwon, S.W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17-40.
2.
Alexander, R.D. (1987). The biology of moral systems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
3.
Astone, N.M., Nathanson, C.A., Schoen, R., & Kim, Y.J. (1999). Family demography, social theory, and investment in social capital. Population and Development Review, 25, 1-31.
4.
Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
5.
Axelrod, R. (1997). The complexity of cooperation: Agent based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
Baker, W., & Faulkner, R. (2009). Social capital, double embeddedness, and mechanisms of stability and change. American Behavioral Scientist, [PE: PLS INSERT VOLUME, PAGES].
7.
Barber, B. (1983). The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
8.
Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.
9.
Blau, P.M., & Schwartz, J.E. (1984). Crosscutting social circles: Testing a macrostructural theory of intergroup relations. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
10.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
11.
Boxman, E.A.W., De Graaf, P.M., & Flap, H.D. (1991). The impact of social and human capital on the income attainment of Dutch managers. Social Networks, 13, 51-73.
12.
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P.J. (1989). The evolution of indirect reciprocity. Social Networks, 11, 213-236.
13.
Briggs, X.S. (1998). Brown kids in White suburbs: Housing mobility and the many faces of social capital. Housing Policy Debate , 9, 177-221.
14.
Burt, R.S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339-365.
15.
Burt, R.S. (2001). Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In N. Lin & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 31-56). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
16.
Campbell, K.E., Marsden, P.V., & Hurlbert, J.S. (1986). Social resources and socioeconomic status. Social Networks, 8, 97-117.
17.
Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital . American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl.), S95-S120.
18.
Dugatkin, L.A., Mesterson-Gibbons, M., & Houston, A.L. (1992). Beyond the prisoner's dilemma: Towards models to discriminate among mechanisms of cooperation in nature. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 7, 202-205.
19.
Edwards, B., & Foley, M.W. (1997). Social capital and the political economy of our discontent. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 669-779.
20.
Epstein, J.M., & Axtell, R. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
21.
Gans, H.J. (1962). The urban villagers: Group and class life of Italian-Americans . New York: Free Press.
22.
Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement . American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
23.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
24.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic-action and social-structure-The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
25.
Homans, G.C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
26.
Kadushin, C. (2004). Too much investment in social capital? Social Networks, 26, 75-90.
27.
Killworth, K.D., McCarty, C., Johnsen, C.E., Shelley, G.A., & Bernard, R.H. (1998). Estimation of seroprevalence, rape, and homelessness in the United States using a social network approach. Evaluation Review, 22, 289-308.
28.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1969). The elementary structures of kinship (J. H. Bell & J. R. von Sturmer, Trans.; R. Needham, Ed.). Boston : Beacon. (Original work published 1949)
29.
Lin, N. (1999). Sunbelt keynote address: Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22, 28-51.
30.
Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Lin, N., Vaughn, J., & Ensel, W. (1981). Social resources and occupational status attainment . Social Forces, 59, 1163-1181.
32.
Lomborg, B. (1996). Nucleus and shield: The evolution of social structure in the iterated prisoner's dilemma. American Sociological Review, 61, 278-307.
33.
Macy, M., & Skvoretz, J. (1998). The evolution of trust and cooperation between strangers: A computational model. American Sociological Review , 63, 638-660.
34.
Nowak, M.A., & Sigmund, K. (1993). A strategy of win stay, lose shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the prisoners-dilemma game. Nature, 364, 56-58.
35.
Nowak, M.A., & Sigmund, K. (1998a). The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 194, 561-574.
36.
Nowak, M.A., & Sigmund, K. (1998b). Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring . Nature, 393, 573-578.
37.
Paxton, P.M. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of Sociology , 105, 88-127.
38.
Paxton, P.M. (2002). Social capital and democracy: An interdependent relationship. American Sociological Review, 67, 254-277.
39.
Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 1-24.
40.
Portes, A. (2000). The two meanings of social capital. Sociological Forum, 15, 1-12.
41.
Portes, A., & Landolt, P. (1996). The downside of social capital. American Prospect, 7, 18-21.
42.
Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
Putnam, R.D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital . Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78.
44.
Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
45.
Rotter, J.B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility . American Psychologist, 35, 1-7.
46.
Sampson, R.J. (1988). Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: A multi-level systemic model. American Sociological Review, 53, 766-779.
47.
Smith, S.S. (2005). "Don't put my name on it": Social capital activation and job-finding assistance among the Black urban poor. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 1-57.
48.
Stack, C. (1974). All our kin. New York: Harper & Row.
49.
Teachman, J.D., Paasch, K., & Carver, K. (1997). Social capital and the generation of human capital . Social Forces, 75, 1343-1359.
50.
Travers, J., & Milgram, S. (1969). An experimental study of the small-world problem . Sociometry, 32, 425-443.
51.
Uslaner, E.M. (1999). Democracy and social capital. In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 121-150). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Varshney, A. (2002). Ethnic conflict and civic life: Hindus and Muslims in India. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
53.
Völker, B., & Flap, H. (1997). The comrades' belief: Intended and unintended consequences of communism for neighborhood relations in the former GDR. European Sociological Review, 13, 241-265.
54.
Watts, D.J. (1999). Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon . American Journal of Sociology, 105, 493-527.
55.
Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Towards a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society , 27, 151-208.
56.
Yamagishi, T., Kikuchi, M., & Kosugi, M. (1999). Trust, gullibility, and social intelligence. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 145-161.
57.
Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 129-166.
