The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been engaged in a process of organizational learning to build civic capacity for nearly 4 decades, in effect discovering its civic mission. This article examines how EPA has increasingly become a more effective enabler of democratic network governance in the watershed arena and has developed ambitious cross-media initiatives to help transform the culture of the agency. Its very progress, however, highlights significant challenges that the agency must address.
Alston, M. (2004, January 19-23). Dispatches. Grist Magazine. Retrieved June 26, 2007, from http://www.grist.org/comments/dispatches/2004/01/19/marc/index.html
Benford, R.D., & Snow, D.A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639.
5.
Berke, P.R., Godschalk, D.R., & Kaiser, E.J. (2006). Urban land use planning (5th ed.). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
6.
Born, S.M., & Genskow, K. (1999). Exploring the watershed approach: Critical dimensions of state-local partnerships (Four Corners Watershed Innovators Initiative, Final Report). Portland, OR: The River Network.
7.
Boyte, H.C. (2005). Reframing democracy: Governance, civic agency, and politics. Public Administration Review, 65, 536-546.
8.
Brulle, R.J., & Essoka, J. (2005). Whose environmental justice? An analysis of the governance structure of environmental justice organizations in the United States. In D. N. Pellow & R. J. Brulle (Eds.), People, power, and pollution: A critical appraisal of the environmental justice movement (pp. 205-218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Chertow, M.R., & Esty, D.C. (1997). Thinking ecologically: The next generation of environmental policy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
10.
Corburn, J. (2005). Street science: Community knowledge and environmental health justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
Cortner, H., & Moote, M. (1999). The politics of ecosystem management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
12.
Costanza, R., & Greer, J. (1995). The Chesapeake Bay and its watershed: A model for sustainable ecosystem management? In L. Gunderson, C. S. Holling, & S. Light (Eds.), Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions (pp. 169-213). New York: Columbia University Press.
13.
Denhardt, J.V., & Denhardt, R.V. (2003). The new public service: Serving, not steering. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
14.
Doppelt, B., Scurlock, M., Frissell, C., & Karr, J. (1993). Entering the watershed: A new approach to save America's ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
15.
Enterprise for the Environment. (1997). The environmental protection system in transition: Toward a more desirable future. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
16.
Firehock, K., Flanigan, F., & Devlin, P. (2002). Community watershed forums: A planners guide. Baltimore: Alliance for Chesapeake Bay.
17.
Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, experts, and the environment: The politics of local knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
18.
Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
Fung, A. (2004). Empowered participation: Reinventing urban democracy . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Godschalk, D., & Stiftel, B. (1981). Making waves: Public participation in state water planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17, 597-614.
21.
Goldsmith, S., & Eggers, W.D. (2004). Governing by network: The new shape of the public sector. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
22.
Goslant, K.H. (1988). Citizen participation and administrative discretion in the cleanup of Narragansett Bay. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 12, 521-568.
23.
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). Why Deliberative Democracy?Princeton: Princeton University Press.
24.
Hajer, M. A., & Wagenaar, H. (Eds.). (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Hanahan, R.A., & Cottrill, C. (2004). A comparative analysis of water quality monitoring programs in the Southeast: Lessons for Tennessee. Knoxville : Tennessee Waters Resources Research Center, University of Tennessee.
26.
Holmes, S., & Sunstein, C.R. (1999). The cost of rights: Why liberty depends on taxes. New York: Norton.
27.
Imperial, M.T., & Hennessey, T. (2000). Environmental governance in watersheds: The importance of collaboration to institutional performance. Washington, DC: National Academy of Public Administration.
28.
Ingram, H., & Smith, S.R. (Ed.) (1993). Public Policy for Democracy . Washington, DC: Brookings.
29.
Innes, J.E., & Booher, D. (1999). "Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems: A Framework for Evaluating Collaborative Planning." Journal of the American Planning Association, 65, 412-23.
30.
John, D. (1994). Civic environmentalism: Alternatives to regulation in states and communities. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
31.
Jones, K., Levesque, V., Williams, K., & Bowden, B. (2004). A review of planning and implementation of protection and restoration activities in small Chesapeake Bay watersheds (February draft) . Washington, DC: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation.
32.
Kemmis, D. (2001). This sovereign land: A new vision for governing the West. Washington, DC: Island Press.
33.
Kettl, D.F. (2002). The transformation of governance: Public administration for twenty-first century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
34.
Koontz, T.M., Steelman, T.A., Carmin, J., Korfmacher, K.S., Moseley, C., & Thomas, C.W. (2004). Collaborative environmental management: What roles for government?Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
35.
Kretzmann, J.P., & McKnight, J.L. (1996). Building communities from the inside out. Chicago: ACTA.
36.
Landy, M., Roberts, M., & Thomas, S. (1990). The Environmental Protection Agency: Asking the wrong questions. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
Lavigne, P.M. (1995). The watershed innovators workshop: Proceedings . Portland, OR: River Network.
38.
Lavigne, P.M. (2004). Watershed councils east and west: Advocacy, consensus, and environmental progress. UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 22, 301-310.
39.
Lee, C. (2005). Collaborative models to achieve environmental justice and healthy communities. In D. N. Pellow & R. J. Brulle (Eds.), People, power, and pollution: A critical appraisal of the environmental justice movement (pp. 219-249). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
Light, P.C. (1998). Sustaining innovation: Creating nonprofit and government organizations that innovate naturally. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
41.
Lindblom, C.E., & Cohen, D.K. (1979). Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42.
McKinney M., & Harmon, W. (2004). The Western Confluence: A Guide to Governing Natural Resources. Washington, DC: Island Press.
43.
Meridian Institute. (2001, June 27-July 1). Final report of the National Watershed Forum. Arlington, VA: Author.
44.
Metzenbaum, S.H. (2002). Measurement that matters: Cleaning up the Charles River. In D. F. Kettl (Ed.), Environmental governance: A report on the next generation of environmental policy (pp. 58-117). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
45.
National Academy of Public Administration. ( 1995). Setting priorities, getting results: A new direction for the Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC : Author.
46.
National Academy of Public Administration. ( 1997). Resolving the paradox of environmental protection: An agenda for Congress, EPA, and the states. Washington, DC : Author.
47.
National Academy of Public Administration. ( 2000). Environment.gov: Transforming environmental protection for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Author.
48.
National Academy of Public Administration. ( 2007). Taking environmental protection to the next level: An assessment of the U.S. environmental services delivery system. Washington, DC: Author.
49.
National Research Council. (1999). New strategies for America's watersheds. Washington, DC : National Academy Press.
50.
Nerbonne, J.F. (2003). Volunteer macroinvertebrate monitoring as a tool for citizen empowerment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, St. Paul.
51.
Ohrel, R.L., Jr., & Register, K.M. (2001). Volunteer estuary monitoring: A methods manual (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Ocean Conservancy and U.S. EPA.
52.
Pelkey, N.W. (2001). Making watershed partnerships work: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127, 378-385.
53.
Pierre, J. (Ed.). (2000). Debating governance: Authority, steering, and democracy. New York : Oxford University Press.
54.
Poff, N.L., Brinson, M.M., & Day, J.W., Jr. (2002). Aquatic ecosystems and global climate change: Potential impacts on inland freshwater and coastal wetland ecosystems in the United States. Arlington, VA : Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
55.
Powell, J.W. (1890, June). Institutions for arid lands. Century Magazine, pp. 111-116.
56.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
57.
Rabe, B.G. (2006). Power to the states: The promise and pitfalls of decentralization. In N. J. Vig & M. E. Kraft (Eds.), Environmental policy: New directions for the twenty-first century (6th ed., pp. 34-56). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
58.
Reich, R. B. (Ed.) (1988). The power of public ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59.
Rios, J. (2000). Environmental justice groups: Grass-roots movement or NGO network? Policy Studies Review, 17, 179-211.
60.
Rosenbaum, W. (1978). Slaying beautiful hypotheses with ugly facts: EPA and the limits of public participation. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 6, 161-173.
61.
Ruckelshaus, W.D. (1996, November 15). Restoring public trust in government: A prescription for restoration. Washington, DC: NAPA. Retrieved June 26, 2007, from http://www.napawash.org/resources/lectures/lecture_transcripts_web_1996.html
62.
Sabatier, P.A., Focht, W., Lubell, M., Trachenberg, Z., Vedlitz, A., & Matlock, M. (2005). Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63.
Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
64.
Scharpf, F.W. (1997). Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder, CO: Westview.
65.
Schneider, A.L., & Ingram, H. (1997). Policy Design for Democracy. University Press of Kansas.
66.
Schön, D.A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
67.
Schueler, T., & Kitchell, A. (2005). Methods to develop restoration plans for small urban watersheds. Ellicott City, MD: Center for Watershed Protection.
Senge, P.M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
70.
Shutkin, W. (2000). The land that could be: Environmentalism and democracy in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
71.
Sirianni, C. (2007). Neighborhood planning as collaborative democratic design: The case of Seattle. Journal of the American Planning Association, 73, 373-387.
72.
Sirianni, C. (2009). Investing in Democracy: Engaging Citizens in Collaborative Governance. Washington, DC: Brookings .
73.
Sirianni, C., & Friedland, L.A. (2001). Civic innovation in America . Berkeley: University of California Press.
74.
Sirianni, C., & Friedland, L.A. (2005). The civic renewal movement: Community building and democracy in the U.S. Dayton, OH : Kettering Foundation.
75.
Sørensen, E. (2002). Democratic theory and network governance. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 24, 693-720.
76.
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). Network governance and post-liberal democracy . Administrative Theory and Praxis, 27, 197-237.
77.
Targ, N. (2005). The states' comprehensive approach to environmental justice. In D. N. Pellow & R. J. Brulle (Eds.), People, power, and pollution: A critical appraisal of the environmental justice movement (pp. 171-184). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
78.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1999 ). EPA's framework for community-based environmental protection . Washington, DC: U.S. EPA, Office of Policy, Office of Reinvention.
79.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2002 ). Community culture and the environment. Washington, DC: U.S. EPA.
80.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2003 ). Evaluation of community-based environmental protection projects: Accomplishments and lessons learned. Washington, DC: U.S. EPA, Office of Policy Economics and Innovation.
81.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2005 a). Sustained commitment needed to further advance watershed approach: Evaluation report. Washington, DC: U.S. EPA, Office of Inspector General.
82.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2008 , March). Handbook for developing watershed plans to restore and protect our waters. Washington, DC: U.S. EPA, Office of Water.
83.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2005 b). Community-based watershed management: Lessons from the National Estuary Program. Washington, DC: U.S. EPA, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds.
84.
Weber, E.P. (2003). Bringing society back in: Grassroots ecosystem management, accountability, and sustainable communities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85.
Weber, E.P., Lovrich, N.P., & Gaffney, M. (2005). Collaboration, enforcement, and endangered species: A framework for assessing collaborative problem-solving capacity. Society and Natural Resources, 18, 677-698.
86.
Weber, E.P., & Khademian, A.M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review68, 334-349.
87.
Wilson, W., & Muñoz, P. (2006, March 22). Sustainable financing for watershed groups. Watershed Academy, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Live Webcast.
88.
Wondolleck, J.M., & Yaffee, S.L. (2000). Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
