This article explores a paradox revealed by our research on the democratic practices of women's groups in Québec. In focus groups and interviews, grassroots members active in these groups suggested that formal decision making structures had little meaning to most grassroots members. Workers and board members also identified a significant distance between members' participation and formal democratic structures. However, these same informants spoke eloquently of the meaning of democracy and its importance in these groups. This article analyses the meaning of democracy and democratic structures for the members of these women's groups. The analysis sits at the intersection of feminist theory on democracy and Alain Touraine's theory of the emergence of the subject through participation in democratic processes. The article explores the nuances, contradictions and richness of the different meanings of democracy for the members of these women's groups.
Acker, J. (1995). Feminist goals and organizing processes. In M. M. Ferree & P. Y. Martin (Eds.), Feminist organizations: Harvest of the new women's movement (pp. p. 137-144). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
2.
Beeman, J., Guberman, N., Fournier, D., Gervais, L., & Lamoureux, J. (2003, Winter). Are the movement's organizations open to the movement's members? A study of democratic practices in women's groups in Québec. Resources for Feminist Research, 30(1/2). pp. 101-123.
3.
Bélanger, P., & Lévesque, B. (1992). Le mouvement populaire et communautaire: de la revendication au partenariat (1963-1992) [The community movement and community: From demands to partnership]. In G. Daigle & G. Rocher (Eds.), Québec en jeu [Quebec en play] (pp. 713-741). Montréal, Canada: Presses de l'Université de Montréal.
4.
Collin, F. (1992). Démocratie homogène et démocratie hétéogène [Homogeneous democracy and heterogeneous democracy]. Conjonctures, 17, 127-136.
5.
Couillard, M.-A. (1994). Le pouvoir dans les groupes de femmes de la région de Québec [Power in women's groups in the Quebec City region]. Recherches Sociographiques, 35(1), 39-65.
6.
Favreau, L. (1989). Mouvement populaire et intervention communautaire de 1960 à nos jours [The Community movement and community intervention from 1960 to the present day]. Montreal, Canada: Éditions du Fleuve/Centre de formation populaire.
7.
Ferguson, K. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
8.
Godbout, J. (1983). La participation contre la démocratie [Participation against democracy]. Montreal, Canada: Éditions Saint-Martin.
9.
Guberman, N. (2004). Les pratiques démocratiques en action [Democratic practices in action]. In N. Guberman, J. Lamoureux, J. Beeman, D. Fournier, & L. Gervais (Eds.), Le défi des pratiques démocratiques dans les groupes de femmes [The challenges of democratic practices in women's groups] (pp. 151-182). Montreal, Canada: Éditions Saint-Martin.
10.
Guberman, N., Fournier, D., Beeman, J., Gervais, L., & Lamoureux, J. (1997). Innovations et contraintes des pratiques organisationnelles féministes [Innovations and constraints of feminist organizational practices] . Montreal, Canada: Centre de formation populaire et Relais-femmes.
11.
Iannello, K. (1992). Decisions without hierarchy: Feminist interventions in organization theory and practice. New York: Routledge.
12.
Lamoureux, D. (1990). Les services feminists: de l'autonomie à l'extension de l'État-providence [Feminist service: From autonomy to an extension of the welfare state]. Nouvelles pratiques sociales, 3(2), 33-43.
13.
Mansbridge, J. (1990). Feminism and democracy. American Prospect, 1, 126-139.
14.
Mansbridge, J. (1991). Democracy, deliberation and the experience of women. In B. Murchland (Ed.), Higher education and the practice of democratic politics: A political education reader. Dayton, OH: Kettering Foundation .
15.
Masson, D. (1999/2000). Constituting "post-welfare state" welfare arrangements: The role of women's movement services groups in Québec . Resources for Feminist Research, 27(3/4), 49-70.
16.
Pateman, C. (1989). The disorder of women: Democracy, feminism and political theory. Stanford, UK: Stanford University Press.
17.
Pennell, J. (1989). Democratic hierarchy in feminist organizations . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bryn Mawr College , Pennsylvania
18.
Riger, S. (1984). Vehicles for empowerment: The case for feminist movement organizations. In J. Rappaport, C. Smith & R. Hess (Eds.), Studies in empowerment: Steps toward understanding and action. New York: Haworth.
19.
Rothschild-Whitt, J. (1979a, August). The collectivist organization : An alternative to rational-bureaucratic models. American Sociological Review , 44, pp. 509-521.
20.
Rothschild-Whitt, J. (1979b). Conditions for democracy: Making participatory organizations work. In J. Case & R. C. C. Taylor (Eds.), Co-ops, communes and collectives: Experiments in social change in the 1960s and 1970s (pp. 215-244). New York: Pantheon .
21.
Touraine, A. (1997). Pourrons-nous vivre ensemble? Egaux et différents [Can we live together? Equality and difference]. Paris : Fayard.
