Metacoverage is understood as a discursive outcome of structural mediatization processes in modern media wars. It is defined as news stories that report on war topics in their connection to the role of news journalism or political public relations. A content analysis of press coverage on the last two Gulf Wars shows that journalists used four frames to describe the role of the news media and of military news management; these frames are called conduit, strategy, personalization, and accountability . Five leading newspapers from Germany, chosen for their detached stance in both international conflicts, displayed a marked increase in metacoverage from the first Iraq war, in 1991, compared with the second, in 2003. Journalists tended to write themselves into the story more often and portrayed the news media involvement in increasingly more active terms. Although the news media were presented as a consequential protagonist (strategy frame), their coverage also endeavored to assist citizens to reach an educated judgment on the relationship of war and media (accountability frame). Consequences for political communication and public diplomacy are discussed.
Artz, L., & Kamalipour, Y. R. (Eds.). (2004). Bring 'em on: Media and politics in the Iraq war. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
2.
Altheide, D.L. (2004). Media logic and political communication. Political Communication, 21, 293-296.
3.
Bennett, W.L. (1990). Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40, 103-125.
4.
Bennett, W.L., Lawrence, R.G., & Livingston, S. (2007). When the press fails. Political power and the news media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
5.
Bertrand, C.-J. (2000). Media ethics and accountability systems. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
6.
Bertrand, C.-J. (Ed.) (2003). An arsenal for democracy: Media accountability systems. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
7.
Blumler, J.G., & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication, 16, 209-230.
8.
Carruthers, S.L. (2000). The media at war. Houndsmills , UK: Macmillan.
9.
Cleve, G., Bertram, A., Karaoglu, Z., & Yilmaz, G. (2002). Das Problem der wahren Berichterstattung: Die Medien über die Rolle der Medien im Krieg [The problem of true reporting: The media on the role of the media in wars]. In M. Jäger & S. Jäger (Eds.), Medien im Krieg [Media at war] (pp. 173-225). Duisburg, Germany: Duisburger Institut für Sprach- und Sozialforschung.
10.
Colford, P. (1998). Media on media: Does the public really care? Mediaweek, 8, 38-43.
11.
D'Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multi-paradigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52, 870-888.
12.
D'Angelo, P., & Esser, F. (2003). Metacoverage of the press and publicity in campaign 2000 network news. In L. L. Kaid, J. C. Tedesco, D. Bystrom , & M. S. McKinney (Eds.), The millennium election: Communication in the 2000 campaigns (pp. 89-103). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
13.
Eilders, C. (2000). Media as political actors? Issue focusing and selective emphasis in the German quality press. German Politics , 9, 181-206.
14.
Esser, F. (2008). Dimensions of Political news cultures: Sound bite and image bite news in France, Germany, Great Britain and the United States . International Journal of Press Politics, 13(4): 401-428.
15.
Esser, F., & D'Angelo, P. (2003). Framing the press and the publicity process: A content analysis of metacoverage in campaign 2000 network news. American Behavioral Scientist, 46, 617-641.
16.
Esser, F., & D'Angelo, P. (2006). Framing the press and the publicity process in German, British and U.S. general election campaigns: A comparative study of metacoverage. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics , 11, 44-66.
17.
Farnsworth, S.J., & Lichter, S.R. (2003). The nightly news nightmare: Network television's coverage of U.S. presidential elections, 1988-2000. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
18.
Fengler, S. (2003). Holding the media accountable: A study of media reporters and media critics in the United States. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80, 818-832.
19.
Gehlen, M. (2003). German skepticism about America's intent and goals in Iraq. Nieman Reports, 57, 99-100.
20.
Gilboa, E. (2000). Mass communication and public diplomacy: A theoretical framework. Communication Theory, 10, 275-309.
21.
Gitlin, T. (1991). Bites and blips: Chunk news, savvy talk and the bifurcation of American politics. In P. Dahlgren & C. Sparks (Eds.), Communication and citizenship: Journalism and the public sphere in the new media age (pp. 119-136). London: Routledge .
22.
Hallin, D.C. (1992). Sound-bite news: Television coverage of elections, 1968-1988. Journal of Communication, 42, 5-24.
23.
Hallin, D., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems. Three models of media and politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Haumann, W., & Petersen, T. (2004). German public opinion on the Iraq conflict: A passing crisis with the USA or a lasting departure? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16, 311-330.
25.
Hutchinson Commission on Freedom of the Press. ( 1947). A free and responsible press. Chicago : Chicago University Press.
26.
Jowett, G., & O'Donnell, V. (1992). Propaganda and persuasion (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
27.
Katovsky, B., & Carlson, T. (2003). Embedded: The media at war in Iraq. Guilford, CT: Lyons Press.
28.
Kellner, D. (1992). The Persian Gulf TV war. Boulder, CO: Westview.
29.
Kerbel, M.R. (1999). Remote and controlled: Media politics in a cynical age (2nd rev. ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
30.
Lehmann, I. (2005). Exploring the transatlantic media divide over Iraq: How and why U.S. and German media differed in reporting on UN weapons inspections in Iraq, 2002-2003. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10, 63-89.
31.
Loeffelholz, M. (2003, May). Distanz in Gefahr. Journalist , pp. 10-13.
32.
Lumsden, L.J. (2002). Press criticism. In W. D. Sloan & L. M. Parcell (Eds.), American journalism: History, principles, practices (pp. 55-65). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
33.
MacArthur, J.R. (2004). Second front: Censorship and propaganda in the 1991 Gulf War (updated2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
34.
Manheim, J.B. (1994). Strategic public diplomacy and American foreign policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Mazzoleni, G., & Schulz, W. (1999). Mediatization of politics. A challenge for democracy ? Political Communication, 16, 247-262.
36.
Maurer, T., Vogelgesang, J., Weiss, M., & Weiss, H.-J. (2007). Active or passive news people? The role of the mass media in the Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq wars. In B. Pfetsch & S. Adam (Eds.), Actor-centered perspectives in political communication research-Research questions, paradigms and problems (pp. 144-167). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag.
37.
McQuail, D., (2005). McQuail's mass communication theory (5th ed.). London: Sage .
38.
Meyer, T. (2002). Media democracy: How the media colonize politics . Cambridge, UK: Polity.
39.
Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G.M. (1993). Framing analysis. An approach to news discourse . Political Communication, 10, 55-73.
40.
Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G.M. (2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation . In S. D. Reese, O. Gandy, & A. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 35-66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
Patterson, T.E. (1994). Out of order (2nd ed.). New York: Vintage.
42.
Pfau, M., Haigh, M., Gettle, M., Donnelly, M., Scott, G., Warr, D., et al. (2004). Embedding journalists in military combat units: Impact on newspaper story frames and tone. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 74-88.
43.
Pfetsch, B. (2004). From political culture to political communications culture: A theoretical approach to comparative analysis. In F. Esser & B. Pfetsch (Eds.), Comparing political communication: Theories, cases, and challenges (pp. 344-366). New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Plasser, F., with Plasser, G. (2002). Global political campaigning: A worldwide analysis of campaign professionals and their practices. Westport, CT: Praeger.
45.
Poniewozik, J. (2003, March 31). Real battles in real time. Time (Special Issue: Gulf War II), pp. 60-62.
46.
Pritchard, D. (2000). Introduction: The process of media accountability . In D. Pritchard (Ed.), Holding the media accountable (pp. 1-10). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
47.
Reinemann, C. (2003). Medienmacher als Mediennutzer [Media workers as media users]. Koeln: Boehlau. English summary retrieved March 23, 2005, from http://www.ejo.ch(titledWhatJournalistsRead)
48.
Robinson, M. (1983, December). Media, rate thyselves. Washington Journalism Review, pp. 31-33.
49.
Scheufele, D.A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49, 103-122.
50.
Schulz, W. (2004). Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept. European Journal of Communication, 19, 87-101.
51.
Shoemaker, P.J., & Reese, S.D. (1996). Mediating the message. Theories of influences on mass media content (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
52.
Simons, H.W. (1994, November). "Going meta": Definition and political applications. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 80, 468-481.
53.
TBS Editors. (2003, Spring/Summer). Media on media: Introduction. Transnational Broadcasting Studies , 10. Retrieved March 23, 2005, from http://www.tbsjournal.com/Archives/Spring03/media%201.html
54.
Thomass, B. (2003). Media accountability systems in Germany. In C.-J. Bertrand (Ed.), An arsenal for democracy. Media accountability systems (pp.323-332). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
55.
Tumber, H., & Palmer, J. (2004). Media at war: The Iraq crisis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56.
Turow, J. (1994). Hidden conflicts and journalistic norms: The case of self-coverage. Journal of Communication, 44, 29-46.
57.
Voegele, M. (2004). Kritischer Medienjournalismus als Chance für bessere Kriegsberichterstattung? [Media criticism as a chance for better war coverage?] . Zeitschrift für Kommunikationsökologie, 6, 67-70. English summary retrieved March 23, 2005, from http://www.ejo.ch(titledLingeringGunSmoke)
58.
Zaller, J. (1999). A theory of media politics. How the interests of politicians, journalists and the citizens shape the news . Retrieved March 23, 2005, from http://www.polisci.ucla.edu/faculty/zaller/
59.
Zelizer, B. (1992). CNN, the Gulf war, and journalistic practice. Journal of Communication, 42, 66-81.
60.
Weiss, R. (Ed.). (2005). Zur Kritik der Medienkritik [A critique of media criticism]. Berlin: Vistas.
