Ego enhancement has been offered as the psychological mechanism that drives differences in judgments about effects on self and others. This study employs a three-cell (ego threat, ego enhancement, and control) experimental design to test the validity of the ego-enhancement argument in explaining the third-person perception and related outcomes (e.g., support for government control). Findings indicate that although ego enhancement does not appear to directly influence either third-person perception or its relationship to support for government control, it does play a moderating role in regulating the relationship between perceived effects and support for controls, especially in the case of perceived effects on others. Specifically, the ego-enhancement condition effectively muted the relationship between estimates of effects and support for government control. Implications of these findings and directions for further research are also discussed.
Branscombe, N.R., & Wann, D.L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641-657.
2.
Brosius, H.B., & Engel, D. (1996). The causes of third person effects: Unrealistic optimism, impersonal impact, or negative attitudes toward media influence . International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 142-162.
3.
Brown, J.D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, 4, 353-376.
4.
Brown, J.D., & Smart, S.A. (1991). The self and social conduct: Linking self-representation to prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 60, 368-375.
5.
Chapin, J.R. (2000). Third-person perception and optimistic bias among urban minority at-risk youth. Communication Research, 27, 51-81.
6.
Cohen, J., & Davis, R. (1991). Third-person effects and the differential impact in negative political advertising. Journalism Quarterly, 68, 680-688.
7.
Cohen, J., Mutz, D., Price, V., & Gunther, A.C. (1988). Perceived impact of defamation: An experiment on third-person effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 161-173.
8.
Davison, W.P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1-15.
9.
DeFleur, M.L., & Ball-Rokeach, S. (1989). Theories of mass communication (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
10.
Duck, J.M., & Mullin, B. (1995). The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third-person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology , 25, 77-93.
11.
Dunning, D., Leuenberger, A., & Sherman, D.A. (1995). A new look at motivated inference: Are self-serving theories of success a product of motivational forces? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 77-93.
12.
Eveland, W.P., & McLeod, D.M. (1999). The effect of social desirability on perceived media impact: Implications for third-person perceptions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 11, 315-333.
13.
Eveland, W.P., Nathanson, A.I., Detenber, B.H., & McLeod, D.M. (1999). Rethinking the social distance corollary: Perceived likelihood of exposure and the third-person perception . Communication Research, 26, 275-302.
14.
Fein, S., & Spencer, S.J. (1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 31-44.
15.
Gunther, A.C. (1991). What we think others think: Cause and consequence in the third-person effect. Communication Research, 18, 355-372.
16.
Gunther, A.C. (1995). Overrating the X-rating: The third-person perception and support for censorship of pornography. Journal of Communication , 45(1), 27-38.
17.
Gunther, A.C., & Mundy, P. (1993). Biased optimism and the third-person effect. Journalism Quarterly, 70, 58-67.
18.
Gunther, A.C., & Thorson, E. (1992). Perceived persuasive effects of product commercials and public service announcements: Third-person effects in new domains. Communication Research, 19, 574-596.
19.
Helweg-Larsen, M., & Sheppard, J.A. (2001). Do moderators of the optimistic bias affect personal or target risk estimates? A review of literature. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(1), 74-95.
20.
Henrikson, L., & Flora, J.A. (1999). Third-person perception and children: Perceived impact of pro- and anti-smoking ads. Communication Research , 26, 643-665.
21.
Hoorens, V., & Ruiter, S. (1996). The optimal impact phenomenon: Beyond the third person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 599-610.
22.
Innes, J.M., & Zeitz, H. (1988). The public's view of the impact of the mass media: A test of the "thirdperson" effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 457-463.
23.
Jansen, S.C. (1991). Censorship: The knot that binds power and knowledge . New York: Oxford University Press .
24.
Lasorsa, D.L. (1989). Real and perceived effects of "Amerika." Journalism Quarterly, 66, 373-378, 529.
25.
McLeod, D.M., Eveland, W.P., Jr., & Detenber, B.H. (2000). Behind the third-person effect: Differentiating perceptual processes for self and other. Journal of Communication, 51, 678-695.
26.
McLeod, D.M., Eveland, W.P., Jr., & Nathanson, A.I. (1997). Support for censorship of misogynic rap lyrics: An analysis of the third-person effect. Communication Research, 24, 153-174.
27.
Meirick, P.C. (2003, August). Self-esteem, self-affirmation and threats to self-worth: Testing a motivational explanation for the third-person effect . Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Kansas City, MO.
28.
Meirick, P.C. (2005a). Rethinking the target corollary: The effects of social distance, perceived exposure, and perceived predispositions on first-person and third-person perceptions. Journal of Communication, 32, 822-843.
29.
Meirick, P.C. (2005b). Self-enhancement motivation as a third variable in the relationship between first-and third-person effects. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17, 473-483.
30.
Paul, B., Salwen, M.B., & Dupagne, M. (2000). The third-person effect: A meta-analysis of the perceptual hypothesis. Mass Communication & Society, 3, 57-85.
31.
Perloff, R.M. (1996). Perceptions and conceptions of political media impact: The third-person effect and beyond. In A. N. Crigler (Ed.), The psychology of political communication (pp. 177-197). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
32.
Perloff, R.M. (1999). The third-person effect: A critical review and synthesis. Media Psychology, 1, 353-378.
33.
Price, V., Huang, L.N., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). Third-person effects of news coverage: Orientations toward media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly , 74(3), 525-540.
34.
Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Huang, L.N. (1998). Third-person effects on publication of a Holocaust-denial advertisement. Journal of Communication, 48(2) 3-26.
35.
Reid, S.A., & Hogg, M.A. (2005). A self-categorization explanation for the third-person effect. Human Communication Research, 31, 129-161.
36.
Rojas, H., Shah, D.V., & Faber, R.J. (1996). For the good of others: Censorship and the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 163-186.
37.
Rucinski, D., & Salmon, C.T. (1990). The "other" as the vulnerable voter: A study of the third-person effect in the 1988 campaign. International Journal of Public Opinion, 2, 345-368.
38.
Sableman, M. (1997). More speech, not less. Carbondale : Southern Illinois University Press.
39.
Salwen, M.B. (1998). Perceptions of media influence and support for censorship: The third-person effect in the 1996 presidential election. Communication Research, 25, 259-285.
40.
Salwen, M.B., & Dupagne, M. (2003). News of Y2K and experiencing Y2K: Exploring the relationship between the third-person effect and optimistic bias. Media Psychology, 5, 57-82.
41.
Scharrer, E., & Leone, R. (2006). I know you are but what am I? Young people's perceptions of varying types of video game influence. Mass Communication & Society, 9, 261-286.
42.
Shah, D.V., Faber, R.J., & Youn, S. (1999). Susceptibility and severity: Perceptual dimensions underlying the third-person effect. Communication Research , 26, 240-267.
43.
Thorson, E., & Coyle, J. (1984). The third person effect in three genres of commercials: Product and greening ads, and public service announcements. In K. King (Ed.), Proceedings of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 103-112). Athens: University of Georgia.
44.
Tsfati, Y., & Cohen, J. (2003). On the effect of the "third-person effect": Perceived influence of media coverage and residential mobility intentions. Journal of Communication, 53, 711-727.
45.
Weinstein, N.D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806-820.
46.
White, H.A., & Dillon, J.F. (2000). Knowledge about others' reaction to a public service announcement: The impact of self-persuasion and third-person perception. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 788-803.
