Traditional impression formation studies have focused almost exclusively on the perception and evaluation of isolated individuals. In recent years, however, portrayals of third-party encounters between two (or more) people have been used increasingly often to probe impressions about the interactions and relations between individuals. This tacit paradigm change has revealed an intriguing scope of judgments that concern how and why people relate to one another. Though these judgments recruit well-known neural networks of impression formation, their underlying cognitive operations and functional significance remain largely speculative. By providing an overview of recent theoretical and empirical approaches on encounter-based impressions, this article highlights their prevalent role in human social cognition.
AloniM.BiernieriF. J. (2004). (See References). A representative study that provides further support for the claim that observers of brief third-party encounters typically struggle to determine other people’s rapport as discussed in the current article.
2.
DuncanB. L. (1976). (See References). A historical classic; one of the first papers to raise attention to encounter-based impressions.
3.
GeorgeC.WestM. L. (2012). (See References). A well-written book that illustrates a recent attempt to use encounter-based impressions to assess social-cognitive functioning.
4.
HesseE.MikulanE.DecetyJ.SigmanM.del Carmen GarciaM.. . . IbanezA. (2016). (See References). A seminal paper that uses electrophysiological recordings from patients with implanted electrodes to demonstrate the brain’s speediness in judging third-party encounters.
5.
WuD. W. L.AndersonN. C.BischofW. F.KingstoneA. (2014). (See References). A thorough eye-tracking study capturing people’s tendency to look back and forth between those who constitute a third-person encounter in order to assess salient visual information about them.
6.
AloniM.BiernieriF. J. (2004). Is love blind? The effects of experience and infatuation on the perception of love. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 287–295.
7.
Benson-AmramS.DantzerB.StrickerG.SwansonE. M.HolekampK. E. (2016). Brain size predicts problem-solving ability in mammalian carnivores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113, 2532–2537.
8.
BernieriF. J.GillisJ. S.DavisJ. M.GraheJ. E. (1996). Dyad rapport and the accuracy of its judgment across situations: A Lens Model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 110–129.
9.
BryantG. A.FesslerD. M. T.FusaroliR.ClintE.AarøeL.ApicellaC. L.. . . ZhouY. (2016). Detecting colaughter across 24 societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113, 4682–4687.
10.
BurgoonJ. K.BullerD. B.HaleJ. L.de TurckM. A. (1984). Relational messages associated with nonverbal behaviors. Human Communication Research, 10, 351–378.
11.
ByrgeL.DuboisJ.TyszkaJ. M.AdolphsR.KennedyD. P. (2015). Idiosyncratic brain activation patterns are associated with poor social comprehension in autism. Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 5837–5850.
12.
CanessaN.AlemannoF.RivaF.ZaniA.ProverbioA. M.MannaraN.. . . CappaS. F. (2012). The neural bases of social intention understanding: The role of interaction goals. PLoS ONE, 7(7), e42347. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042347
13.
CentellesL.AssaianteC.NazarianB.AntonJ.- L.SchmitzC. (2011). Recruitment of both the mirror and mentalizing networks when observing social interactions depicted by point-lights: A neuroimaging study. PLoS ONE, 6(1), e15749. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105036
14.
ChristO.SchmidK.LolliotS.SwartH.StolleD.TauschN.. . . HewstoneM. (2014). Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on outgroup prejudice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111, 3996–4000.
15.
CostanzoM.ArcherD. (1989). Interpreting the expressive behavior of others: The interpersonal perception task. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 225–244.
CraccoE.De CosterL.AndresM.BrassM. (2015). Motor simulation beyond the dyad: Automatic imitation of multiple actors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 1488–1501.
18.
DaliliM. N.Penton-VoakI. S.HarmerC.MunafoM. R. (2015). Meta-analysis of emotion recognition deficits in major depressive disorder. Psychological Medicine, 45, 1135–1144.
19.
de la RosaS.ChoudheryR. N.CurioC.UllmanS.AssifL.BülthoffH. H. (2015). Visual categorization of social interactions. Visual Cognition, 22, 1233–1271.
20.
de Oliveira LauxS. H.KsenofontovI.BeckerJ. C. (2015). Explicit but not implicit sexist beliefs predict benevolent and hostile sexist behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 702–715.
21.
DuncanB. L. (1976). Differential social perception and attribution of intergroup violence: Testing the lower limits of stereotyping Blacks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 590–598.
22.
FawcettC.GredebäckG. (2013). Infants use social context to bind actions into a collaborative sequence. Developmental Science, 16, 841–849.
23.
GeorgeC.WestM. L. (2012). The adult attachment projective picture system. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
GeorgescuA. L.KuzmanovicB.SantosN. S.TepestR.BenteG.TittgemeyerM.VogeleyK. (2014). Perceiving nonverbal behavior: Neural correlates of processing movement fluency and contingency in dyadic interactions. Human Brain Mapping, 35, 1362–1378.
25.
GredebäckG.MelinderA. (2010). Infants’ understanding of everyday social interactions: A dual process account. Cognition, 114, 197–206.
26.
HamlinJ. K. (2013). Failed attempts to help and harm: Intention versus outcome in preverbal infants’ social evaluations. Cognition, 128, 451–474.
27.
HessU.BlaisonC.KafetsiosK. (2016). Judging facial emotion expressions in context: The influence of culture and self-construal orientation. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 40, 55–64.
28.
HesseE.MikulanE.DecetyJ.SigmanM.del Carmen GarciaM.. . . IbanezA. (2016). Early detection of intentional harm in the human amygdala. Brain, 139, 54–61.
29.
KnowlesE. S. (2015). Spatial behavior of individuals and groups. In PaulusP. B. (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 53–86). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
30.
KujalaM. V.CarlsonS.HariR. (2012). Engagement of amygdala in third-person view of face-to-face interaction. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 1753–1762.
31.
LatifN.BarbosaA. V.Vatikiotis-BatesonE.CastelhanoM. S.MunhallK. G. (2014). Movement coordination during conversation. PLoS ONE, 9(8), e105036. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105036
32.
MacraeC. N.QuadfliegS. (2010). Perceiving people. In FiskeS.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 428–463). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
33.
ManeraV.Del GiudiceM.BaraB. G.VerfailieK.BecchioC. (2011). The second-agent effect: Communicative gestures increase the likelihood of perceiving a second agent. PLoS ONE, 6(7), e22650. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022650
34.
ManeraV.von der LüheT.SchilbachL.VerfaillieK.BecchioC. (2016). Communicative interactions in point-light displays: Choosing among multiple response alternatives. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1580–1590.
35.
MasonM.MageeJ. C.FiskeS. T. (2014). Neural substrates of social status inference: Roles of medial prefrontal cortex and superior temporal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 1131–1140.
36.
NeriP. (2009). Wholes and subparts in visual processing of human agency. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276, 861–869.
37.
Penton-VoakI. S.PoundN.LittleA. C.PerrettD. (2006). Personality judgments from natural and composite facial images: More evidence for a “kernel of truth” in social perception. Social Cognition, 24, 490–524.
38.
Penton-VoakI. S.ThomasJ.GageS. H.McMurranM.McDonaldS.MunafòM. R. (2013). Increasing recognition of happiness in ambiguous facial expressions reduces anger and aggressive behavior. Psychological Science, 24, 688–697.
39.
PlaceS. S.ToddP. M.ZhuangJ.PenkeL.AsendorpfJ. B. (2012). Judging romantic interest of others from thin slices is a cross-cultural ability. Evolution & Human Behavior, 33, 547–550.
40.
PryorJ. B.ReederG. D.MonroeA. E. (2012). The infection of bad company: Stigma by association. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 224–241.
41.
PuccinelliN. M.Tickle-DegnenL.RosenthalR. (2004). Effect of target position and target task on judge sensitivity to felt rapport. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 211–220.
42.
QuadfliegS.GentileF.RossionB. (2015). The neural basis of perceiving person interactions. Cortex, 70, 5–20.
43.
QuadfliegS.Ul-HaqI.MavridisN. (2016). Now you feel it, now you don’t: How observing robots and people can make you feel eerie. Interaction Studies, 17, 203–240.
44.
Schmid MastM.HallJ. A. (2004). Who is the boss and who is not? Accuracy of judging status. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 145–165.
45.
ShimpiP. M.AkhtarN.MooreC. (2013). Toddlers’ imitative learning in interactive and observational contexts: The role of age and familiarity of the model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 309–323.
46.
SinkeC. B. A.SorgerB.GoebelR.de GelderB. (2010). Tease or threat? Judging social interactions from bodily expressions. NeuroImage, 49, 1717–1727.
47.
UljarevicM.HamiltonA. (2013). Recognition of emotions in autism: A formal meta-analysis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 1517–1526.
48.
VillaniD.MorgantiF.CipressoP.RuggiS.RivaG.GilliG. (2015). Visual exploration patterns of human figures in action. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01636
49.
VrticˇkaP.SanderD.VuilleumierP. (2012). Influence of adult attachment style on the perception of social and non-social emotional scenes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 530–544.
50.
WangY.QuadfliegS. (2015). In our own image? Emotional and neural processing differences when observing human-human versus human-robot interactions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10, 1515–1524.
51.
WuD. W. L.AndersonN. C.BischofW. F.KingstoneA. (2014). Temporal dynamics of eye movements are related to differences in scene complexity and clutter. Journal of Vision, 14, 1–14.
