Political advertising effects on candidate evaluations, issue recall, political cynicism, and gender differences are explored in this pretest—posttest examination of 764 young adult participants. Results show no major gender differences in evaluation of candidates. Participants reported learning more about Bush's image and more about Kerry's issues through the ads. Exposure to ads did not produce increased cynicism among the participants but significantly increased political information efficacy.
Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1995). Going negative: How political advertisements shrink and polarize the electorate. New York: Free Press.
2.
Atkin, C.K., Bowen, L., Nayman, O.B., & Sheinkopf, K.G. (1973). Quality versus quantity in televised political ads. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 209-224.
3.
Atkin, C.K., & Heald, G. (1976). Effects of political advertising. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 216-228.
4.
Basil, M., Schooler, C., & Reeves, B. (1991). Positive and negative political advertising: Effectiveness of ads and perceptions of candidates. In F. Biocca (Ed.), Television and political advertising (Vol. 1, pp. 245-262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Brians, C.L., & Wattenberg, M.P. (1996). Campaign issue knowledge and salience: Comparing reception from TV commercials, TV news, and newspapers. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 172-193.
6.
Bystrom, D.G., Banwart, M.C., Kaid, L.L., & Robertson, T. (2004). Gender and candidate communication: Videostyle, webstyle, newstyle. New York: Routledge .
7.
Cappella, J.N., & Jamieson, K.H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Christ, W.G., & Thorson, E. (1994). Do attitudes toward political advertising affect information processing of televised political commercials?Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 38(3), 251-271.
9.
Cundy, D.T. (1986). Political commercials and candidate image: The effects can be substantial. In L. L. Kaid , D. Nimmo, & K. R. Sanders (Eds.), New perspectives on political advertising (pp. 210-234). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
10.
Declare Yourself. (2003). Major national survey shows increased promise, new strategies for increasing youth vote. Youth Vote 2004 survey shows narrow window of opportunity to engage young voters; points to “political incompetence” as major barrier to voting. Retrieved on June 20, 2005, from http://www.declareyourself.org/press/pressroom.htm
11.
Delli Carpini, M.X. (2000). Gen.com: Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication, 17, 341-349.
12.
Devlin, L.P. (2005). Contrasts in presidential campaign commercials of 2004. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(2), 279-313.
13.
Faber, R.J., & Storey, M.C. (1984). Recall of information from political advertising . Journal of Advertising, 13, 39-44.
14.
Federal Election Commission. (2004). Data drawn from Congressional Research Service reports, Election Data Services Inc., and state election offices. Retrieved January 6, 2006 , from http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0781453.html
15.
Garramone, G.M. (1984). Voter responses to negative political ads. Journalism Quarterly, 61, 250-259.
16.
Garramone, G.M., Atkin, C.K., Pinkleton, B.E., & Cole, R.T. (1990). Effects of negative advertising on the political process. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 34, 299-311.
17.
Groenendyk, E.W., & Valentino, N.A. (2002). Of dark clouds and silver linings: Effects of exposure to issue versus candidate advertising on persuasion, information retention, and issue salience. Communication Research , 29(3), 295-319.
18.
Herrnson, P.S., & Patterson, K.D. (2000). Agenda-setting and campaign advertising in congressional elections. In J. A. Thurber, C. J. Nelson, & D. A. Dulio (Eds.), Crowded airways: Campaign advertising in elections (pp. 96-112). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
19.
Holbert, R.L., Benoit, W.L., Hansen, G.J., & Wen, W.-C. (2002). The role of communication in the formation of an issue-based citizenry. Communication Monographs, 69, 296-310.
20.
Johnson-Cartee, K.S., & Copeland, G.A. (1989). Southern voters' reaction to negative political ads in 1986. Journalism Quarterly, 66(4), 888-893.
21.
Just, M., Crigler, A., & Wallach, L. (1990). Thirty seconds or thirty minutes: What viewers learn from spot advertisements and candidate debates. Journal of Communication, 40, 120-133.
22.
Kahn, K.F., & Geer, J.G. (1994). Creating impressions: An experimental investigation of political advertising on television. Political Behavior , 16(1), 93-116
23.
Kahn, K.F., & Kenney, P.J. (2000). How negative campaigning enhances knowledge of Senate elections. In J. A. Thurber, C. J. Nelson, & D. A. Dulio (Eds.), Crowded airwaves: Campaign advertising in elections (pp. 65-95). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
24.
Kaid, L.L. (1994). Political advertising in the 1992 campaign. In R. E. Denton Jr. (Ed.), The 1992 presidential campaign (pp. 111-127). Westport, CT: Praeger.
25.
Kaid, L.L. (1998). Videostyle and the effects of the 1996 presidential campaign advertising. In R. E. Denton Jr. (Ed.), The 1996 presidential campaign: A communication perspective (pp. 143-159). Westport, CT: Praeger.
26.
Kaid, L.L. (2001). Technodistortions and effects of the 2000 political advertising. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(12), 2370-2378.
27.
Kaid, L.L. (2002). Political advertising and information seeking: Comparing exposure via traditional and Internet channels. Journal of Advertising, 31(1), 27-36.
28.
Kaid, L.L. (2003). Effects of political information in the 2000 presidential campaign: Comparing traditional television and Internet exposure. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(5), 677-689.
29.
Kaid, L.L. (2004). Measuring candidate images with semantic differentials . In K. L. Hacker (Ed.), Presidential candidate images (pp. 231-236). Westport, CT: Praeger.
30.
Kaid, L.L., Chanslor, M., & Hovind, M. (1992). The influence of program and commercial type on political advertising effectiveness. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 36, 303-320.
31.
Kaid, L.L., & Holtz-Bacha, C. (2000). Gender differences in response to televised political broadcasts: A multicountry comparison. Harvard Journal of International Press/Politics, 5(2), 17-29.
32.
Kaid, L.L., Landreville, K.D., Postelnicu, M., & Martin, J.D. (2005, May). Enhancing information efficacy for young voters: The effects of political advertising and debates. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention , New York.
33.
Kaid, L.L., McKinney, M.S., & Tedesco, J.C. (2000). Civic dialogue in the 1996 presidential campaign: Candidate, media, and public voices. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
34.
Kaid, L.L., McKinney, M.S., & Tedesco, J.C. (2004, November). Information efficacy and young voters . Paper presented at the National Communication Association Conference, Chicago.
35.
Kaid, L.L., & Postelnicu, M. (2005). Political advertising and responses of young voters: Comparison of traditional television and Internet messages. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(2), 265-278.
36.
Kaid, L.L., & Sanders, K.R. (1978). Political television commercials: An experimental study of the type and length. Communication Research, 5, 57-70.
37.
Kaid, L.L., & Tedesco, J.C. (1999). Presidential candidate presentation: Videostyle in the 1996 presidential spots. In L. L. Kaid & D. G. Bystrom (Eds.), The electronic election: Perspectives on the 1996 campaign communication (pp. 209-221). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38.
Lang, A. (1991). Emotion, formal features, and memory for televised political advertisements. In F. Biocca (Ed.), Television and political advertising (Vol. 1, pp. 221-243). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
Lemert, J.B., Wanta, W., & Lee, T. (1999). Party identification and negative advertising in a U.S. Senate election. Journal of Communication, 49, 123-134.
40.
Martinelli, K.A., & Chaffee, S.H. (1995). Measuring new-voter learning via three channels of political information. Journalism andMass Communication Quarterly, 72, 18-32.
41.
McCombs, M., Lopez-Escobar, E., & Llamas, J.P. (2000). Setting the agenda of attributes in the 1996 Spanish general election. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 77-92.
42.
Murphy, K. (2000, April 25). Report: Young voters, candidates share blame for apathy. Kansas City Star. Retrieved January 10, 2004, from http://www.kcstar.com
43.
National Association of Secretaries of State. (1999). New millennium survey: American youth attitudes on politics, citizenship, government, and voting . Retrieved on October 11, 2005, from http://www.stateofthevote.org/survey/
44.
Newhagen, J.E., & Reeves, B. (1991). Emotion and memory responses for negative political advertising: A study of television commercials used in the 1988 presidential election. In F. Biocca (Ed.), Television and political advertising (Vol. 1, pp. 197-220). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
Patterson, T.E., & McClure, R.D. (1976). The unseeing eye: Myth of television power in politics. New York: Putnam.
46.
Perloff, R.M., & Kinsey, D. (1992). Political advertising as seen by consultants and journalists. Journal of Advertising Research, 36, 53-60.
47.
Pinkleton, B.E., Um, N.-H., & Weintraub Austin, E. (2002). An exploration of the effects of negative advertising on political decision making. Journal of Advertising, 31(1), 13-25.
48.
Putnam, R.D. (1995). Turning in, turning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science and Politics , 28, 664-683.
49.
Rahn, W.M., & Hirshorn, R.M. (1999). Political advertising and public mood: A study of children's political orientations. Political Communication, 16, 387-407.
50.
Roberts, M. (1992). Predicting voter behavior via the agenda-setting tradition. Journalism Quarterly, 69(4), 878-892.
51.
Rosenstone, S.J., Kinder, D.R., Miller, W.E., & the National Election Studies. ( 1997). American national election study 1996: Pre- and post-election survey [Computer file]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies (Producer) and Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (Distributor).
52.
Rothschild, M.L., & Ray, M.L. (1974, July). Involvement and political advertising effect: An exploratory experiment. Communication Research, 1, 264-285.
53.
Tinkham, S.F., & Weaver-Lariscy, R.A. (1993). A diagnostic approach to assessing the impact of negative political television commercials. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 37(4), 377-400.
54.
Valentino, N.A., Hutchings, V.L., & Williams, D. (2004). The impact of political advertising on knowledge, Internet information seeking, and preference. Journal of Communication , 54(2), 337-354.
55.
West, D.M. (1993). Air wars: Television advertising in election campaigns, 1952-1992. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
56.
Yang, S. (2004). Americans spend more energy and time watching TV than on exercise, finds new study. UC Berkeley News. Retrieved December 2, 2005, from http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2004/03/10_amtv.shtml
57.
Zhao, X., & Bleske, G.L. (1995). Measurement effects in comparing voter learning from television news and campaign advertisements. Journalism andMass Communication Quarterly, 72(1), 72-83.
