Because of historical structural barriers to their participation, minority groups have been characterized in past studies as less participatory, less efficacious, and more cynical than racial and ethnic majority voters. This study examines minority youth voters in terms of attitudes and feelings toward political candidates, channels of political information, and feelings of efficacy and cynicism through advertising experiments conducted across the United States. There was little effect on minority voter cynicism after exposure to ads, suggesting that young minorities find candidates believable, credible, and trustworthy. Peers are identified as the most significant source of information in these groups, making interpersonal communication a major change agent for young minority voters.
Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1995). Going negative: How political advertisements shrink and polarize the electorate. New York: Free Press.
2.
Bimber, B. (2001). Information and political engagement in America: The search for effects of information technology at the individual level. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 53-67.
3.
Bimber, B. (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Cassel, C. (2002). Hispanic turnout—Estimates from validated voting data. Political Research Quarterly, 55(2), 391-408.
5.
Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. (2004). Youth voting in the 2004 election . Available from http://www.civicyouth.org/PopUps/FactSheets/FS-PresElection04.pdf
6.
Chaffee, S., & Frank, S. (1996). How Americans get political information: Print vs. broadcast news. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546, 48-58.
7.
Cundy, D. (1986). Political commercials and candidate image: The effects can be substantial. In L. L. Kaid , D. Nimmo, & K. R. Sanders (Eds.), New perspectives on political advertising (pp. 210-234) Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
8.
Freedman, P., Franz, M., & Goldstein, K. (2004). Campaign advertising and democratic citizenship . American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 723-741.
9.
Gilliam, F., & Iyengar, S. (2000). Prime suspects: The influence of local television news on the viewing public. American Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 560-573.
10.
Harvard Institute of Politics. (2005). Survey on student attitudes: The global generation [Executive report]. Available from http://www.iop.harvard.edu/pdfs/survey/spring_poll_2005_execsumm.pdf
11.
Hoffman, D.L., & Novak, T.P. (1998). Bridging the racial divide on the Internet. Science, 280, 390-391.
12.
Kahn, K., & Geer, F. (1994). Creating impressions: An experimental investigation of political advertising on television. Political Behavior , 16(1), 93-116.
13.
Kaid, L.L. (1998). Videostyle and the effects of the 1996 presidential campaign advertising. In R. E. Denton Jr. (Ed.), The 1996 presidential campaign: A communication perspective (pp. 143-159). Westport, CT: Praeger.
14.
Kaid, L.L., Landreville, K.D., Postelnicu, M., & Martin, J.D. (2005, May). Enhancing information efficacy for young voters: The effects of political advertising and debates. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention , NY.
15.
Kaid, L.L., McKinney, M., & Tedesco, J. (2000). Civic dialogue in the 1996 presidential campaign: Candidate, media, and public voices. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
16.
Kasschau, P. (1976). The development of feelings of political efficacy in a sample of young Mexican children. Pacific Sociological Review, 19(2), 211-230.
17.
Mayer, W. (1996). The polls: Poll trends—Trends in media usage . Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 593-611.
18.
McLeod, J., & MacDonald, D. (1985). Beyond simple exposure: Media orientations and their impact on the political process. Communication Research , 12, 3-33.
19.
Neuman, R., Just, M., & Crigler, A. (1992). Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Patterson, T., & McClure, R. (1976). The unseeing eye: The myth of television power in national elections. New York: Putnam.
21.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2000). Attitudes toward the news: Internet sapping broadcast news audience. Available from http://www.people-press.org/reports/displayphp3?PageID=203
22.
Sears, D. (1969). Black attitudes toward the political system in the aftermath of the Watts insurrection. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 13, 515-544.
23.
Shah, D., Kwak, N., & Holbert, R. (2001). Connecting and disconnecting with civic life: Patterns of internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication, 18, 141-162.
24.
Tolbert, C., & McNeal, R. (2003). Unraveling the effects of the Internet on political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56(2), 175-185.
25.
West, D.M. (1994). Political advertising and news coverage in the 1992 California U.S. Senate campaigns. Journal of Politics , 56(4), 1053-1075.
26.
Zhao, X., & Chaffee, S. (1995). Campaign advertisements versus television news as sources of political issue information. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, 41-65.
