This article uses elements of autoethnography in the form of dialogue to frame the text. The author reports the dilemmas involved in conducting research that is culturally appropriate and offers a critique of standard academic language and procedures. The story method provides a major methodological tool to tell the stories of women in a study, funded by the Status of Women Canada between 1997 and 2000, titled “North American Indian, Métis, and Inuit Women Speak About Culture, Education, and Work.” Research procedures, how the participants influenced the shaping of policy recommendations, and follow-up results are discussed.
The Indian Act and amendments, 1970-1993: An indexed collection. (1993). Saskatoon, SK, Canada: University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon Native Law Centre.
2.
Kenny, C. (2002). North American Indian, Métis, and Inuit women speak about culture, education, and work. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Status of Women Canada.
3.
Kenny, C., Faries, E., Fiske, J., & Voyageur, C. (2004). A holistic framework for Aboriginal policy research. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Status of Women Canada.
4.
Kirkness, V. J., & Archibald, J. (2001). The First Nations Longhouse: Our home away from home. Vancouver, BC, Canada: First Nations House of Learning.
5.
Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. (1996). Ethical guidelines for research. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Government of Canada. Retrieved from http://www.indigenous.bc.ca
6.
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
7.
Stout, M. D., & Kipling, G. D. (1998). Aboriginal women in Canada: Strategic research directions for policy development. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Status of Women Canada.
