Although television advertising remained a dominant form of communication in the 2004 presidential election, the Internet reached new levels of campaign importance, providing voters with information from candidates, the media, and independent sources. Internet sites not only provided online viewing of traditional television advertising but also provided voters with the opportunity to seek out additional information about television ads viewed on the Web. Drawing on theory and research related to channel variables, this study compared the reactions of young voters who experienced candidate advertising on television or on the Web. Results indicate that the channel really does make a difference. John Kerry’s ads were more successful in raising his image and learning scores when viewed on the Web with access to additional information sources. However, television viewing reduced feelings of political cynicism and alienation for young voters.
Andreoli, V., & Worchel, S. (1978). Effects of media, communicator and message position on attitude change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 59-70.
2.
Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1995). Going negative: How attack ads shrink and polarize the electorate. New York: The Free Press.
3.
Bennett, S. E. (1997). Why young Americans hate politics and what we should do about it. PS, 30(1), 47-53.
4.
Capella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1996). News frames, political cynicism, and media cynicism. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546, 71-84.
5.
Cohen, A. (1976). Radio vs. TV: The effects of the medium. Journal of Communication, 26, 29-35.
6.
comScore Media Metrix. (2004, November 15). 25 million Americans visited politics sites in the final month of the presidential race. Retrieved January 20, 2005, from http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=517
7.
Corrado, A., & Firestone, C. C. (Eds.). (1996). Elections in cyberspace: Toward a new era in American politics. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
8.
Delli Carpini, M. X. (2000). Gen.com: Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication, 17, 341-349.
9.
Festa, P. (2004, May 18). Bush’s site neck and neck with Kerry’s in traffic race. Retrieved January 20, 2005, from http://news.com.com/Bush’s+site+neck+and+neck+with+Kerry’s+in+traffic+race/2100-1028_3-5215121.html
10.
Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2000). Perceptions of Internet information credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 515-540.
11.
Garramone, G., Atkin, C. K., Pinkleton, B. E., & Cole, R. (1990). Effects of negative political advertising on the political process. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 34, 299-311.
12.
Garramone, G. M., Harris, A. C., & Pizante, G. (1986). Predictors of motivation to use computer-mediated political communication systems. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 30, 445-457.
13.
Hacker, K. L. (1996). Missing links in the evolution of electronic democratization. Media, Culture, & Society, 18(2), 212-232.
14.
Hansen, G. J. (2000, November). Internet presidential campaigning: The influences of candidate Internet sites on the 2000 election. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention, Seattle, WA.
15.
Hansen, G. J., & Benoit, W. L. (2002, November). Presidential campaigning on the Web: The influence of candidate World Wide Web sites in the 2000 general election. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention, New Orleans, LA.
16.
Jacques, W. W., & Ratzan, S. C. (1997). The Internet’s World Wide Web and political accountability: New media coverage of the 1996 presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 1226-1237.
17.
Johnson, R. J., Braima, M. A., & Sothirajah, J. (1999). Doing the traditional media sidestep: Comparing the effects of the Internet and other nontraditional media with traditional media in the 1996 presidential campaign. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 99-123.
18.
Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (1998). Cruising is believing? Comparing Internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(2), 325-340.
19.
Kaid, L. L. (2002, Spring). Political advertising and information seeking: Comparing the exposure via traditional and Internet media channels. Journal of Advertising, 31, 27-35.
20.
Kaid, L. L. (2003). Effects of political information in the 2000presidential campaign: Comparing traditional television and Internet exposure. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(5), 677-689.
21.
Kaid, L. L., McKinney, M. S., & Tedesco, J. C. (2000). Civic dialogue in the 1996 presidential campaign: Candidate, media, and public voices. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
22.
Kaid, L. L., Tedesco, J. C., & McKinney, M. S. (2004, November). Information efficacy and young voters. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Conference, Chicago.
23.
Katz, E., & Feldman, J. (1962). The debates in light of research: A survey of surveys. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates (pp. 173-223). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
24.
Keane, J. (1995). Structural transformation of the public sphere. The Communication Review, 1, 1-22.
25.
McKinney, M. S., & Gaddie, K. C. (2000, November). The medium and the message: TV vs. Internet viewing of a presidential primary debate. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention, Seattle, WA.
26.
McKinnon, L. M. (1995, August). Mediating political mudsliding or magnifying advertising effects: An experimental study of adwatch effects on voters’ evaluations of the candidates and their ads. Paper presented at the Association of Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Conference, Phoenix, AZ.
27.
McKinnon, L. M., Tedesco, J. C., & Kaid, L. L. (1993). The third 1992 presidential debate: Channel and commentary effects. Argumentation and Advocacy, 30, 106-118.
28.
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
Milbank, D. (1999, July 5). Virtual politics. The New Republic, pp. 22, 27.
30.
Murphy, K. (2000, April 25). Report: Young voters, candidates share blame for apathy. Kansas City Star. Retrieved January 10, 2004, from http://www.kcstar.com.
31.
Pearlstein, S. (1996, January 30). Angry female voters a growing force. Washington Post, p.1.
32.
The Pew Research Center for The People & Press. (2003). Perception of partisan bias seen as growing—especially by democrats: Cable and Internet loom large in fragmented political news universe. Retrieved February 22, 2004, from http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/200.pdf
33.
The Pew Research Center for The People & Press. (2004). Voters liked campaign 2004 but too much “mud-slinging.” Retrieved November 21, 2004, from http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=233
34.
Politics Online. (2004). Web traffic. Retrieved January 20, 2005, from http://politicsonline.com/globalcontent/elections/elections2004/webtraffic.asp
35.
Rosenstone, S. J., Kinder, D. R., Miller, W. E., & the National Election Studies. (1997). American national election study, 1996: Pre- and post-election survey. Retrieved October 10, 2004, from http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/datalib/major/us_nes.htm
36.
Salomon, G. (1990). Cognitive effects with and of computer technology. Communication Research, 17(1), 26-44.
37.
Scheufele, D. A., & Nisbet, M. (2001, September). Being a citizen online: New opportunities and dead ends. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Convention, San Francisco.
38.
Stromer-Galley, J. (2003). Diversity of political conversation on the Internet: Users’ perspectives. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(3). Retrieved August 26, 2004, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue3/index.html
39.
Sullivan, J. F. (1995). Politics, journalism and the Net. Nieman Reports, 49(4), 33-35.
40.
Tedesco, J. C., & Kaid, L. L. (2000, November). Candidate Web sites and voter effects: Investigating uses and gratifications. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention, Seattle, WA.
41.
Tolbert, C., & McNeal, R. (2001, September). Does the Internet increase voter participation in elections? Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Convention, San Francisco.
42.
Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., & Williams, D. (2004). The impact of political advertising on knowledge, Internet information seeking, and preference. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 337-354.
43.
Vancil, D. L., & Pendell, S. D. (1987). The myth of viewer-listener disagreement in the first Kennedy-Nixon debates. Central States Speech Journal, 38, 16-27.
