Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Dramaturgy, an interactionist perspective, was developed by Erving Goffman, a sociologist working in the theoretical tradition of seminal social theorists including Durkheim and Parsons. This article’s thesis is that although the typical application of dramaturgy has been to interpersonal contexts, dramaturgy’s symbolic orientation and its rich terminological vocabulary make it particularly well suited for the analysis of political communication, widely perceived as a theatrical and symbolic domain. This metatheoretical article attempts to extend dramaturgy to politics, notwithstanding the apparently little interest in politics displayed by Goffman himself. The article’s political focus is the U.S. presidential campaign of 2004, which opposed George Bush and John Kerry. The contest is examined in the dramaturgic terms of performance, expressive control, disidentification, region management, and stigmatization.

Keywords

political communication political campaigns dramaturgy presidential campaigns performance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aucoin, D. (2004, September 20). In search of the voice of the people. Boston Globe, p. C-1.

Backstage with Bush. (2004, September 6). Time, 164(10), 28-35.

Barton, L. (2001). Crisis in organizations II. Cincinnati, OH: Southwestern.

Berger, B. (1974). Foreword. In E. Goffman, Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience (p. xi). Boston: Northeastern University Press.

Denison, D. (2004, September 12). Two top acting coaches on how to play the president. Boston Globe, pp. D1, D4.

Durkheim, E. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life (K. E. Field, Trans.). New York: Free Press.

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.

Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Goffman, E. (1969). Strategic interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

10.

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

11.

Goodman, E. (2004, March 11). Presidential casting call. Boston Globe, p. H-11.

12.

Gourevitch, P. (2004a, July 26). Damage control. New Yorker, 80(20), 50-62.

13.

Gourevitch, P. (2004b, September 13). BushSpeak. New Yorker, 80(26), 36-43.

14.

Gourevitch, P. (2004c, October 18). Reality check. New Yorker, 80(31), 96-102.

15.

Hochschild, A. (2003). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1983)

16.

McGuirk, B. (Executive Producer). (2005, January 31). Imus in the morning [Radio broadcast interview of John Kerry]. Boston: WTKK. Retrieved from http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6928257/print/1/displaymode/1098

17.

Popkin, S. L. (1994). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago.

18.

Schechner, R. (2003). Performance theory. New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1988)

19.

Shakespeare, W. (1936). Macbeth. In G. L. Kittredge (Ed.), The complete works of Shakespeare. Boston: Gin and Company.

20.

Shakespeare, W. (1936). Richard II. In G. L. Kittredge (Ed.), The complete works of Shakespeare. Boston: Gin and Company.

21.

Smith, A. (2004, July 30). Show and tell. New York Times, p. A-15.

22.

Turner, J. (1974). The structure of sociological thought. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

Acting Presidential

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References