How a country’s apex court functions and how its justices decide cases is shaped by its institutional design and history and by the political and cultural context in which it sits. I compare the apex courts of 38 Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, finding that the power and role of the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) makes it unique among them. SCOTUS’s appointment process, lifelong judicial terms, agenda-setting powers, consensus norms, and constitutional framework make it an exceptionally powerful and exceptionally partisan court. Further, several factors that encourage a tendency toward the protection of rights in other apex courts are less relevant to SCOTUS. This comparison highlights that SCOTUS is the most partisan of the OECD apex courts, among the most powerful, and relatively less likely than other courts to uphold core democratic principles.
AdamsMichelleAndriasKateBalkinJackBaudeWilliamBauerBobBoddieEliseCharlesGuy-Uriel E.CrespoAndrew M.DellingerWalterDriverJustinFallonRichardJrFredricksonCarolineGerkenHeatherGertnerNancyGriffithThomas B.GroveTara L.HuangBert I.IfillSherrilynJohnsonOlatunde C.KangMichael S.LaCroixAlison L.LemosMargaret H.LeviDavid F.MorrisonTrevor W.PildesRichard H.RamseyMichael D.RodríguezCristina M.RooseveltKermitRossBertrallStraussDavid A.TribeLaurence H.WaldmanMichaelWhiteAdamWhittingtonKeith E.2021. Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States. Final Report: Washington, DC: Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States. Available from https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/3779.
2.
AlarieBenjaminGreenAndrew J.2017. Commitment and cooperation on high courts: A cross-country examination of institutional constraints on judges. Oxford University Press.
3.
Biden White House Archives. 2024. Remarks by President Biden commemorating the 60th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act, 29July. Austin, TX. Available from bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov.
4.
BrownRebecca L.EpsteinLee. 2023. Is the US Supreme Court a reliable backstop for an overreaching US president? Maybe, but is an overreaching (partisan) court worse?Presidential Studies Quarterly53(2): 234–255.
5.
BugaričBojanGinsburgTom. 2016. The assault on postcommunist courts. Journal of Democracy27(3): 69–82.
6.
CameronCharles M.KastellecJonathan P.2024. The Supreme Court: How did we get here? And what comes next?The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science713:35–56.
7.
CarrubbaClifford J.GabelMatthewHanklaCharles. 2008. Judicial behavior under political constraints: Evidence from the European Court of Justice. American Political Science Review102(4): 435–452.
8.
ChiltonAdamVersteegMila. 2020. How constitutional rights matter. Oxford University Press.
9.
ElkinsZacharyGinsburgTom. 2022. Characteristics of national constitutions, version 4.0. Last modified 24 October 2022. Comparative Constitutions Project. Available from comparativeconstitutionsproject.org.
10.
EpsteinLeeGrendstadGunnarŠadlUrškaWeinshallKeren, eds. 2024. The Oxford handbook of comparative judicial behaviour. Oxford University Press.
11.
EpsteinLeeLandesWilliam M.PosnerRichard A.2013. The behavior of federal judges: A theoretical and empirical study of rational choice. Harvard University Press.
12.
FerejohnJohnPasquinoPasquale. 2004. The law of the exception: A typology of emergency powers. International Journal of Constitutional Law2(2): 210–239.
13.
GaroupaNunoGillRebecca D.TiedeLydia B., eds. 2021. High courts in global perspective: Evidence, methodologies, and findings. University of Virginia Press.
14.
GaroupaNunoGinsburgTom. 2019. Judicial reputation: A comparative theory. University of Chicago Press.
15.
GaroupaNunoSantos BotelhoCatarina. 19October2022. Judicial dissent in collegial courts: Theory and evidence. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics, ed. ThompsonWilliam R.Oxford University Press. Available from oxfordre.com.
16.
GibsonJames L.2024. The U.S. Supreme Court’s legitimacy: How public opinion updates. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science713:260–277.
17.
GinsburgTomHuqAziz Z.2020. How to save a constitutional democracy, paperback edition. University of Chicago Press.
18.
HuqAzizGinsburgTom. 2018. How to lose a constitutional democracy. UCLA Law Review65(1): 78–169.
19.
IgnatieffMichael, ed. 2005. American exceptionalism and human rights. Princeton University Press.
20.
IssacharoffSamuel. 2015. Fragile democracies: Contested power in the era of constitutional courts. Cambridge University Press.
21.
IssacharoffSamuel. 2023. Democracy unmoored: Populism and the corruption of popular sovereignty. Oxford University Press.
22.
KeckThomas M.2024. The U.S. Supreme Court and democratic backsliding. Law & Policy46(2): 197–218.
23.
KelemenKatalin. 2018. Judicial dissent in European constitutional courts: A comparative and legal perspective. Routledge.
24.
Korematsu v. United States. 1944. 323 U.S. 214.
25.
LawDavid S.2016. The anatomy of a conservative court: Judicial review in Japan. In Public law in East Asia, eds. ChenAlbert H.Y.GinsburgTom. Routledge.
26.
LawDavid S.VersteegMila. 2012. The declining influence of the United States Constitution. New York University Law Review87(3): 762–858.
27.
LemleyMark A.2022. The imperial Supreme Court. Harvard Law Review Forum136(1): 97–118.
28.
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. 2024. 603 U.S. 369.
29.
LustigDoreenWeilerJoseph H. H.2018. Judicial review in the contemporary world—Retrospective and prospective. International Journal of Constitutional Law16(2): 315–372.
30.
MetzgerGillian E.2024. The Roberts court and executive power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science88–106.
31.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2022. Constitutions in OECD countries: A comparative study: Background report in the context of Chile’s constitutional process. OECD Publishing. Available from www.oecd.org.
32.
PerettiTerri Jennings. 2001. In defense of a political court. Princeton University Press.
33.
Plessy v. Ferguson. 1896. 163 U.S. 537.
34.
RoznaiYaniv. 2017. Unconstitutional constitutional amendments: The limits of amendment powers. Oxford University Press.
35.
ScheppeleKim Lane. 2018. Autocratic legalism. University of Chicago Law Review85(2): 545–584.
36.
StatonJeffrey K.ReenockChristopherHolsingerJordan. 2022. Can courts be bulwarks of democracy? Judges and the politics of prudence. Cambridge University Press.
37.
Stone SweetAlec. 2012. Constitutional courts. In The Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law, eds. RosenfeldMichelSajóAndrás. Oxford University Press.
38.
TateC. NealVallinderTorbjörn, eds. 1997. The global expansion of judicial power. New York University Press.
39.
WeidenDavid L.2011. Judicial politicization, ideology, and activism at the high courts of the United States, Canada, and Australia. Political Research Quarterly64(2): 335–347.
40.
WeinshallKerenSommerUdiRitovYa’acov. 2018. Ideological influences on governance and regulation: The comparative case of supreme courts. Regulation & Governance12(3): 334–352.
41.
WhittingtonKeith E.2007. Political foundations of judicial supremacy: The presidency, the Supreme Court, and constitutional leadership in U.S. history. Princeton University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
