Using data from nearly 5,000 votes cast by more than 400 judges in courts of last resort from all 50 states, we investigate whether there is a relationship between a state’s judicial retention method and the likelihood that a judge votes to join a precedent-overturning majority. We find that relative to judges retained by institutions such as judicial commissions or state legislatures, those retained via either partisan or retention elections are significantly more likely to join majorities that overturn precedent. Most of this effect is due to behavior in high-profile cases that garner media attention. We find little evidence that an impending election moderates these effects. Finally, we find no evidence that judges retained via nonpartisan elections treat precedent differently than their institutionally retained colleagues.
BaumLawrenceKleinDavid. 2007. “Voter Responses to High-Visibility Judicial Campaigns.” In Running for Judge: The Rising Political, Financial, and Legal Stakes of Judicial Elections, ed. StrebMatthew J.New York: New York University Press, 140–64.
2.
BonicaAdamWoodruffMichael J.2014. “A Common-Space Measure of State Supreme Court Ideology.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization31 (3): 472–98.
3.
BonneauChris W.HallMelinda Gann. 2009. In Defense of Judicial Elections. New York: Routledge.
4.
BracePaulBoyeaBrent D.2007. “Judicial Selection Methods and Capital Punishment in the American States.” Running for Judge: The Rising Political, Financial, and Legal Stakes of Judicial Elections, ed. StrebMatthew J.New York: New York University Press, 186–203.
5.
BracePaulBoyeaBrent D.2008. “State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges.” American Journal of Political Science52 (2): 360–72.
BracePaulHallMelinda GannLangerLaura. 2001. “Placing State Supreme Courts in State Politics.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly1 (1): 81–110.
8.
BracePaulYatesJeffBoyeaBrent D.2012. “Judges, Litigants, and the Design of Courts.” Law & Society Review46 (3): 497–522.
9.
CaldaroneRichard P.Canes-WroneBrandiceClarkTom S.2009. “Partisan Labels and Democratic Accountability: An Analysis of State Supreme Court Abortion Decisions.” The Journal of Politics71 (2): 560–73.
10.
CannDamon M.WilhelmTeena. 2011. “Case Visibility and the Electoral Connection in State Supreme Courts.” American Politics Research39 (3): 557–81.
11.
CasillasChristopher J.EnnsPeter K.WohlfarthPatrick C.2011. “How Public Opinion Constrains the US Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science55 (1): 74–88.
12.
ChoiStephen J.GulatiG. MituPosnerEric A.2010. “Professionals or Politicians: The Uncertain Empirical Case for an Elected Rather than Appointed Judiciary.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization26 (2): 290–336.
13.
DiamondAlexisSekhonJasjeet S.2013. “Genetic Matching for Estimating Causal Effects: A General Multivariate Matching Method for Achieving Balance in Observational Studies.” Review of Economics and Statistics95 (3): 932–45.
14.
DuboisPhilip L.2008. From Ballot to Bench: Judicial Elections and the Quest for Accountability. Austin: University of Texas Press.
15.
GibsonJames L.1978. “Judges’ Role Orientations, Attitudes, and Decisions: An Interactive Model.” American Political Science Review72 (3): 911–24.
16.
GibsonJames L.2012. Electing Judges: The Surprising Effects of Campaigning on Judicial Legitimacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
GibsonJames L.CaldeiraGregory A.2009. Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations: Positivity Theory and the Judgments of the American People. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
18.
GoelzhauserGreg. 2012. “Accountability and Judicial Performance: Evidence from Case Dispositions.” Justice System Journal33 (3): 249–61.
GoelzhauserGregCannDamon M.2014. “Judicial Independence and Opinion Clarity on State Supreme Courts.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly14 (2): 123–41.
21.
HallMelinda Gann. 1992. “Electoral Politics and Strategic Voting in State Supreme Courts.” The Journal of Politics54 (2): 427–46.
22.
HallMelinda Gann. 1995. “Justices as Representatives: Elections and Judicial Politics in the American States.” American Politics Quarterly23 (4): 485–503.
23.
HallMelinda Gann. 2001. “State Supreme Courts in American Democracy: Probing the Myths of Judicial Reform.” American Political Science Review95 (2): 315–30.
24.
HallMelinda Gann. 2007. “Voting in State Supreme Court Elections: Competition and Context as Democratic Incentives.” Journal of Politics69 (4): 1147–59.
25.
HallMelinda Gann. 2014a. Attacking Judges: How Campaign Advertising Influences State Supreme Court Elections. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
26.
HallMelinda Gann. 2014b. “Representation in State Supreme Courts: Evidence from the Terminal Term.” Political Research Quarterly67 (2): 335–46.
27.
HallWilliam K.AspinLarry T.1987. “The Roll-Off Effect in Judicial Retention Elections.” The Social Science Journal24 (4): 415–27.
28.
HansfordThomas G.SpriggsJames F.2006. The Politics of Precedent on the US Supreme Court. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
29.
HoDaniel E.ImaiKosukeKingGaryStuartElizabeth A.2007. “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference.” Political Analysis15 (3): 199–236.
30.
HoDaniel E.ImaiKosukeKingGaryStuartElizabeth A.2011. “MatchIt: Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference.” Journal of Statistical Software42 (8): 1–28.
31.
HoganRobert E.2008. “Policy Responsiveness and Incumbent Reelection in State Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science52 (4): 858–73.
32.
HuberGregoryGordonSanford C.2004. “Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind When It Runs for Office?” American Journal of Political Science48 (2): 247–63.
KritzerHerbert M.2011. “Competitiveness in State Supreme Court Elections, 1946–2009.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies8 (2): 237–59.
35.
MayhewDavid R.1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. Vol. 26. New Haven: Yale University Press.
36.
MillerWakken E.StokesDonald E.1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review57 (1): 45–56.
37.
OwensRyan J.TahkAlexanderWohlfarthPatrick C.BryanAmanda C.2015. “Nominating Commissions, Judicial Retention, and Forward-Looking Behavior on State Supreme Courts: An Empirical Examination of Selection and Retention Methods.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly15 (2): 211–38.
38.
PosnerRichard A.1993. “What Do Judges and Justices Maximize? (The Same Thing Everybody Else Does).” Supreme Court Economic Review3:1–41.
39.
PosnerRichard A.2005. “Judicial Behavior and Performance an Economic Approach.” Florida State University Law Review32:1259.
40.
RobertsJulian V.DoobAnthony N.1990. “News Media Influences on Public Views of Sentencing.” Law and Human Behavior14 (5): 451–68.
41.
RobertsJulian V.EdwardsDon. 1989. “Contextual Effects in Judgments of Crimes, Criminals, and the Purposes of Sentencing 1.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology19 (11): 902–17.
42.
SchaffnerBrian F.StrebMatthewWrightGerald. 2001. “Tearns without Uniforms: The Nonpartisan Ballot in State and Local Elections.” Political Research Quarterly54 (1): 7–30.
43.
SegalJeffrey A.SpaethHarold J.2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
SekhonJasjeet S.2009. “Opiates for the Matches: Matching Methods for Causal Inference.” Annual Review of Political Science12:487–508.
45.
SekhonJasjeet S.MebaneWalter R.1998. “Genetic Optimization Using Derivatives.” Political Analysis7:187–210.
46.
SquirePeverill. 2008. “Measuring the Professionalization of US State Courts of Last Resort.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly8 (3): 223–38.
47.
ViningRichard L.WilhelmTeena. 2010. “Explaining High-Profile Coverage of State Supreme Court Decisions.” Social Science Quarterly91 (3): 704–23.
48.
ViningRichard L.WilhelmTeena. 2011. “Measuring Case Salience in State Courts of Last Resort.” Political Research Quarterly64 (3): 559–72.
49.
YatesJeffTankersleyHolleyBracePaul. 2010. “Assessing the Impact of State Judicial Structures on Citizen Litigiousness.” Political Research Quarterly63 (4): 796–810.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
